Search:

And what is the rationale behind taking only seasons higher that 2007? Just to boost the result?

Hey there, guys! Was completely messing around with SDQL and found this -
ppp:L and pp:L and p:HL and rest=1 and p:O and p2:O and p3:O and p4:O

Maybe someone is willing to give it a shot.
...

HD and pp:HL and p:AL and p:margin<=-18 and o:rest=0

Can't wait to get things started this year. Thanks for introducing me to the SDQL world last year!

No need really. It's easy enough to find good spot without SDQL.

playoffs=1 and round=2 and seed>o:seed and -5<=line<=-2 and season>=2010

playoffs=1 and round=2 and 205<=total<=210 and H

portland?

What exactly are you talking about?

3-1 so far on totals and ATS

as simple as it gets

playoffs=1 and series game=7 and H

Your appraoch seems correct, but one thing I would improve is that margin range. Because now you are only filtering margins greater than 2 without any limitation, but the thing is that it is a big...

playoffs=1 and series game>1 and H and total<=190 and -11<=line<=-8

No, again, they are not random. You just don't have the tools to use to create models to account for the different variables that influence the outcome frequently enough to make a profit.


...

You don't have to take any statistics class to conclude, that score does not increase linearly throughout the quarters. What anomalies? Can you show me at least 10 games in which score progression is...

You took there only half of my point about 4th quarters. Like I said, it can be the sloppiest and it can be the toughest of the quarters. For example, yesterday in MEM v. OKC game both teams scored...

To put it simple, the problem is that scoring between quarters is practically unrelated. The only thing that differentiates 4th quarter from any other quarter is the possibility of intentional foul...

WOW! Just, WOW!

Looked into the exact same scenario. Though, it has huge up and down fluctuation. Not consistent enough for me. But, anyway, I do think that Raptors is a good bet today, regardless any trends.

Not convinced with that 10 game sample size and parameter "p:AL", since previous game in this situation does not matter at all, or at least it shouldn't matter to the teams in playoff, because those...

Hey, guys! Playoffs are here! Gonna try to find some situations in playoffs as well.

Here's one worth looking at:

H and playoffs=1 and round=1 and series game=1 and total<=185

I was...

tS(L, N=5)>=4 and op:LHF and op:margin<=-10 and rest>0 and o:rest>0 and A and total>=200

H and 102<=tA(points)<=110 and 93<=oA(o: points)<=96 and total<=193 and playoffs=0

Here's one pretty similar from me too in support of Thunder tonight.

p:LA and A and -4<=line<0 and P:L and total>=205 and season>=2006

Also there are two other trends which have been posted...

Definitely on Pelicans today. Here's another one to support Pelicans pick.

p:L and op:L and A and rest>=1 and 0<=line<=3 and P:margin>=5 and season>=2010

This is why you have to stay away from Spurs games like this. Pop was just testing out different things and plays for the whole 2nd half. No worries, take the over in Dallas game.

Thanks for the kind words, guys! :cheers:

Such a sweet spot for trend digging today. Got some sweet ones already for the SAS v. OKC game.

WP>=70 and rest=0 and A and P:LF and season>=2005 and...

Opponent quality can be defined by win percentage, points scored and allowed.

tA(o: points, N=10)>=110 and 93<=oA(points)<=96 and total<=200

Team (in this case Brooklyn) won its previous game as home favourite against the opponent with the win percentage of 65% or higher and will be playing as an away dog with no rest.

And we fade...

P:season=season and P:F and P:ats margin<=-10 and H and -10<=line<=-7 and rest>0 and season>=2007 and game number>=50

tS(ats margin, N=5)>=35 and A and -4<=line<=0 and rest>1 and o:rest>1 and...

Or maybe some Knicks?

p:WHF and po:WP>=65 and rest=0 and AD and season>=2007

So we play Raps today?

WP>=65 and rest=0 and 50<=o:WP<=60 and AD and line<=4 and game number>=62

That over was too obvious even without any trends.

But, JMon, love the situation you posted, will definitely save it. :cheers:

Every day I'm overin'

tA(points)>=102 and oA(points)>=102 and rest>1 and H and -5<=line<=-3 and season=2013

I don't know why forum interface is deleting some parts of query when I save the reply, so I wrote it down 'in words'.

No, that's the problem "P:LH" must be capitalised.
But something gone terribly wrong while copying :D I'll fix it.

Some from me tonight.

<line<=4 and="" opo:p<line<=4 and="" opo:p<line<=4 and="" opo:="" points=""><line<=4 and="" opo:="" points="">Previous match-up was a home loss, Away, 0<=line<=4, opponent...

Two tasty trends pointing on Kings tonight. Both situations were posted previously by JMon, if I'm not mistaking.

p:L and op:L and A and rest>=1 and 0<=line<=3 and P:margin>=5 and season>=2010
...

No problem, man! ;)

Went 3-1 myself with my own finds for yesterday, left one total pick unposted, since it was only a 64% over trend, but played it anyway. Glad I stayed away from that PHX v. LAL...

p:WD and pp:WD and tA(margin, N=2)>=5 and op:WP>=55 and game number>=65 and season>=2007

Road favourite day for me.

Yeah, looked into that as well, but there have been situations around PK, since -1.5 is pretty much the same thing, might have a small play.

tS(A, N=4)=4 and H and (4-rest-p:rest)=3 and o:rest>0 and game number>=65 and P:L

An interesting situation here.

Here's one from previous posts. My apologies, since I don't know to whom the credit for this belongs.

H and season>2009 and line>5 and p:margin<-15 and op:margin>5 and p:A and pp:A

This seems very tempting due to the short line and knowing Cavs line-up at this moment. Though might be a trap line, because Pacers are being heavily backed by the public. Not sure I'm gonna play...

Of course it can go either way, but what I'm trying to say is that this trend does not suit particularly well lines shorter than -7.

Heads up for your effort, but clearly that SU record is mostly made by heavy favourites. If you shorten the line -6<=line<=0, doesn't look so good anymore.

It's basically a working trend for 7 or...

Good day, fellas! Two from me:

oS(L, N=15)>=14 and A and -6.5<=line<=-5 and season>=2000

tS(L, N=4)=4 and tS(ats margin<0, N=5)=5 and A and o:rest=0

Guys, I want to apologise, I won't be posting any new SDQL codes tonight, since I'm out drinking Guinness with buddies. Will play some from already saved personal DB. Good luck, fellas! :cheers:

I see your point here, but you have to understand one thing - the 'average' as such is not the same as 'most of the games', it can be pretty far from that.