Search:

No, you're right Wallco. It couldn't possibly ever help anyone to make your rules even more clear than they are now, or to mention the alternate puckline in your daily post JUST IN CASE the lines...

Yesterday's situation:

Tampa was the moneyline favorite at -115, which means to bet Ottawa +1.5
Ottawa was the puckline favorite at -1.5, which means ... ???


Both your rules (post #1 or...

Come on, Wallco. You're the "admin" of this system. If the odds changed or if you posted incorrectly, fix it - either in the main post for the day or at least in some kind of follow up. Your...

What about Toronto 2009-10 and Nashville 2007-08? Is there a reason those "starting in game 3" series are not listed as losses in your backtest?

Even without those though, bumping Montreal to a...

Thanks. Aside from that though, I am curious why you view winning 3 versus losing 2 games to start the season as somehow different in terms of "streaks that matter".

Okay, I see that difference in the rules (overlooked it, my bad). However - WHY would you make that kind of distinction? Is there something fundamentally different between winning the first 3 or...

Wallco, question about your backtest:

In 2011-12, you list Montreal as having a v2 series loss. Their only 6-game losing streak that season started in game 3, which would have been ignored in...

Thanks Boom. That's where I was getting confused - I couldn't tell whether we first look at the moneyline or the puckline to determine favorite/underdog.

New to the thread. I see that Wallco might not be available, so maybe someone else can answer this question:

For today's bets, I don't have Florida +1 1/2 on my sportsbook (Bovada) except through...