I wonder what the record would be if the results were marked accurately.
SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks
|
Best Sportsbooks List
|
| |||||
#1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
#3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
#4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
#5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review |
Type: Posts; User: calebepley93 Search by Threads Advanced Search View New Posts
I wonder what the record would be if the results were marked accurately.
No one knows how well the system is doing, because you've recorded the results with these random parlays.
Other losses have been tallied with reduced juice due to parlays/run line. It wouldn't be fair to strike this loss just because Texas won.
I've never been a fan of recording the results...
I would play the system as it is. If you're going to alter how you play, mention it in passing but record the results as the system is meant to be played. Otherwise you (and the system) lose all...
No matter how confident you are a team will win, every team you parlay will reduce your odds of winning. I wouldn't call this a very smart money management strategy. If the big bets scare you, try...
We're better off cutting losses imo. If the Dodgers get swept at home by the frickin Padres they don't deserve to be bet on again especially for a D.
Parlaying saves money but it reduces your odds...
I get offended easily as well. Let's watch it from now on, guys.
Gambler's Fallacy.
I get what you're saying and it seems intuitive but it simply is not correct. Since the events have already happen, it doesn't change the likelihood of the Dodgers winning...
Omg some1 said something about a black guy let comment on how racist you are to prove how tolerant and not racist i am omg
Its about betting on teams and methods that have been back tested to show the largest profit. But am I wrong in my my belief that past results don't guarantee future success?
Not trying to hate at...
Yeah I don't think they are a good fit for the system this year until they are healthy, if then. I'm going to hold off on betting them after this series.
I'm nervous about the Yankee series, they look pretty awful.
So you didn't play the system that you back tested in this thread last year? And that's why your profit was only 100+ units?
And yes it's true that past results don't affect or guarantee future...
This looks way to good to be true. How are you not a millionaire by now? :ohmy:
That said I plan on tailing. Keep up the good work!