Search:

And company "Aa6559609 Limited" warrants watching I believe

Hmmmm ... PMing an email address / outside contact info used to lead to a PM ban ..

I'd advise that he change the site to H1 and H2 tag some headings for better SEO, and any of a number of methods to obfuscate the emails rather than use old school/should be deprecated mailto links

but I believe limitations do not apply if fraud or willful conduct can be demonstrated/proven ...

no importance, the UK shell is pretty irrelevant

It is not available for free, online subscriber or print copy only unfortunately.

I'd ask someone I know in London to get/scan/email it but undoubtedly either RP or SBR would frown upon outright...

And if one decides to not enter the UK or Aussieland and chooses one's jurisdictions correctly, such authority is meaningless

And he should be firmly behind forcing a change to segregation and separate handling of funds

I don't live in the UK anymore but did for about fifteen years, and distinctly remember perusing the changes to gambling law and the commission and laughing out loud when it was clear that segregated...

I dont think it was deliberate or perhaps even realised, but yes he's having a larf

<cough>< cough > Enron < / cough > </cough>:yes:

Ladies & gents ... auditors only review and sign off on accounts and details as provided by the firm they are auditing and vetting, and any such audit report contains all the disclaimers in the world...

and correct me if I'm wrong Hareeba, but AFAIR there is no prioritisation of claims per se in UK insolvency law, so having a judgement dated earlier than others or one dated ahead of any final...

Regulators are funded by market participants / fees / taxes / etc in the financial industries/etc as well ...

Not discounting your theory at all but this alone doesn't mean anything

definite freudian slip there :grrr:

Well, debts became again enforceable by law by the book against the punter, but not really vice-versa as this indicates

I didn't say there was necessarily any actual logic behind their blanket treatment of all spread instruments like that ... but things were muddled initially by Cantor and other financial market...

Yep, as that was always from day one "considered" financial market-related activity not gambling-related activity (due to ability to manipulate things directly)

The GC is effectively toothless due to the lack of any legal requirement for segregated accounts or ringfencing operating funds and customer balances

well done Shari, go get'em tiger ...