Search:

To be fair, this year, Columbus and Minnesota both had 15 game winning streaks. That's a huge outlier statistically.

I'm sorry for your loss.

I've got Montreal at -140. Are you sure they're PL?

New Jersey got beat 5-2. They didn't cover. Series 76 is still alive.

No problem. This is how things should be-- we all help out when necessary. Thanks again for all you do.

It was my understanding that #65 Toronto was found to be not a play and the fade Washington series is now #65. Have I missed something?

No worries. Thanks for all your work in here.

Wasn't Winnipeg #67? They're misidentified above as #58 but that was the Columbus series we lost.

Not necessarily. We don't know that they'll be -260 all the way through.

It comes down to your tolerance for risk. Some people will pass, others will bet.

I know if I'm concerned about losing...

Wasn't that a fade NJ series? Anaheim won the C bet last night.

Or am I missing something?

Besides the fact that the information you're looking for is readily available with about 30 seconds of reading, once again, you want someone else to do it for you.

Why is it you can't do the work...

There probably aren't enough people betting enough money to move the lines.

Some scam books sign you up through an affiliate and those who signed up that way get shittier odds on the games that...

Oh, you wanted brief answers? Here ya go:

1. No idea, never asked. Likely, it's the same way you thought of your questions.

2. Why don't you backtest it and see?

3. Zero

4. Why don't you...

If you really want to start doing your own homework, the question to have asked is "where can I find the information I'll need?"

The questions aren't dumb but you're asking people to go back years and test your theories for you.

Do your own homework-- want to know if a system where you bet +130 underdogs is profitable? Do...

Look upthread at post 5393 and check out the amount each losing series lost. This system has a huge amount of juice.

If I understand your question correctly, it would depend on the number of A games winning vs. the number of B wins, C wins and outright losses.

Because this is a high juice system, it would...

LA covered the PL against Minnesota.

Me too. Sucks but it does happen sometimes. Of course, sometimes you win ones you wouldn't have.

Oh... in that case, forget I said anything...

Series 54 was fade Boston. If you didn't get the PL for the B game, and you feel like gambling, the C game would be Edmonton on Wednesday 12/2. I'd likely just leave well enough alone and take the...

Youre right. It was a Rangers-Sabres game snowed out. Don't know why I thought it was Ottawa.

I think it's the game that got snowed out.

That was the deciding factor for me. Under some conditions, I'd continue the chase but Edmonton twice? I'll take the one unit loss and move on.

Sharks haven't beaten Buffalo in close to 5 years. Some teams just have other teams' numbers.

It's a big bet all right.

And, as an added bonus, if we lose, we'll get to hear from Douchebag Kenny. Well, you all will... I've got him on my ignore list.

I'm not confused and I appreciate knowing when the next bet will be. Those who are clueless and/or ridiculous should probably just lurk until they figure it out. It's really not that difficult.

I think the confusion stems from the fact that Wallco posts that there will be a future play from chases already in progress and the questions have been about chases that may start on the same day...

According to ScoresAndOdds.com, New Jersey was the favorite in those one-goal losses, so they have lost 3 SU and 3 ATS.

Can't always wait for the later line. Sometimes I have to place the bets as is.

Oh well. On to the next.

Denver the other night and now Calgary. I'm ready to turn the page on 2013.

Hope 2014 works out better for me.

Wallco, Calgary PL ended at -294.

I can't imagine how much my life would have to suck for me to lurk in threads, waiting for people to lose so I can act like a douche.

i think I'd eat a bullet first.

System is up over 50 units. How's yours doing?

I'm doing just fine, thanks.

But I am tired of your bullshit.

That you have no idea how to bet systems, handicap games or manage your bankroll and then whine whether you win or lose, tells everyone else that you're just a whiny bitch who can't take...

Then either drop your unit size further so that C bets don't stress you out or stop playing this system.

I felt the same way about Game 7 of Rangers-Devils in 1994. Of course, if my Rangers hadn't won, I might feel differently.

If you need chemical help for anxiety on a (B) bet in November, this may not be the system for you.

You're betting to win one unit on the A bet.

if the A bet loses, your B bet is to win whatever you lost on the A bet + 1 unit.

If the B bet loses, your C bet is to win what you lost on your A...

Sorry, I was unclear.

I use 1/2 of 1% of my starting bankroll.

I use about 1/2 of 1% of my bankroll as a unit. This is an extremely juice-heavy system and two or three C bets in one night can be both nerve-wracking and dangerous to your bankroll if you're not...

Why are you RISKING your $100 unit instead of betting TO WIN your $100 unit? The math is much simpler that way.

Use a different book.

Still not seeing what you're offering that's any better nor why you care what we do with our bankrolls.

Do you have anything to offer or are you just a douche who can do nothing but criticize the...

Still waiting to see something better from you.

Also, why do you care what we do with our bankrolls?

Still waiting for you to show something better.

Got anything better?

Really? Win a (B) bet and lose an (A) bet and you lost money?

Kenny's obviously off his meds again.

I think there was a bigger loss with the Devils either last year or the year before on an empty-net goal on the last bet.