Search:

No need to wait. By the looks of things in here all you need to do is neatly pile the money and light the match. Seems simple enough!

Hardly, the systems will speak for themselves. And it's not trolling when something is just this bad. You know I don't go in threads bashing on a regular basis, and I even played this system for a...

Perhaps I should have incorporated soccer plays in an NBA system. Never thought of that, good idea Eyerock.

Yeah, it's a real shame, huh????

The only one that went down was an experimental one, which actually wouldn't have failed had I not added a v2 to it midway through the season. Even still, I knew when to call it quits. Other than...

All you have to do is hit a couple 20 team parlays and you'll be right back in it. Doesn't sound too bad, I mean, you do love parlays, correct?

You cannot seriously still be playing this garbage. If you are, then you are a bigger fool than the guy posting it.

What the hell are you talking about? It's 0.83 units. But still you are correct, no one can afford this system anyway

Quite an outlook! You must be relatively new.

That comes out of the reload hundred!

You don't know if the system was up last year because it was never tested the way he intended to play it. And NO, system properly played is down for this season. Why waste time with a backtest if you...

You might has well just get rid of this sentence!

If you say so! But with 19 open bets and your BOGUS stats barely even showing a profit, I wouldn't exactly call this profitable. Actually, I wouldn't even call it a system anymore. It's starting to...

It's not just your opinion, it's the way it is supposed to be done or what the hell's the point of any of it.

What happens if Oakland wins and all these parlays aren't complete, how do you even know if you would be playing a (D) bet tomorrow? Just like Tampa Bay yesterday. What if that soccer game loses...

That's all well and good, then stop posting your BOGUS stats for what is supposed to be the SYSTEM. There's no system anymore, you have completely gone away from your rules in post #1 and #2 and play...

NO, but it doesn't really matter because the system records are completely tainted anyway from other games that did lose that were also tied in with these ridiculous parlays. The system unit counts...

Why would you foolishly incorporate a soccer parlay with the Angels when the Angels (-1 1/2) are a +money bet anyway? The idea of the parlay, which I don't agree with, is to tie something with the...

I didn't say the parlay was bullshit, but rather the system standings and records are TOTAL bullshit now that non MLB games have been introduced in the panic mode to save face. An actual backtest of...

Actually, it was Ross Wolf, a rookie brought up today. Don't know if he's related, so OMG may not be warranted.

Correction, +51 units on the day and three games still active, one of which I think will definitely lose.

I am dabbling with Samrock's as well. Fortunately I got in just after the three San Fran chase losses at once, so my numbers are around even in there at the moment, not including tonights games, and...

I am playing 6 systems, three of which I created (1 over/under system and two low juice team chases) and they are doing very very well. They are much too complicated for me to try and post, so I am...

I am up 94 units in MLB so far, which ones are you chasing?

Yes, there is some formula for that in one of these threads from last year. I don't believe it was a 50/50 split of the 1 unit, I think there was a certain pecentage for R/L and certain percentage...

I ran this last year for the second half of the season, it didn't do well. I ended down almost 30 units. I did have the stretches where the bad two teams were constantly losing, but also the small...

You are 100% correct.

I already typed my argument for playing ALL bets in +money situations. Check out my post #875. The only time it is not beneficial to play both sides is if the favorite team loses it's whole 4 game...

I've run several systems in here, and honestly, I don't know how you keep track of this one as well as you do anyway. Forgotten plays will happen, don't sweat it. Good job.

You are assuming both series end at that point. However, TB will have three more chances to make back that extra 30 that was lost, however, the extra money that was lost by reducing the +money bet...

For starters, you can't just reverse it, one line is -145 and the other is +135. So risking 435 to win 300 will not be 300 to win 435 the other way, If you get lines like that, don't EVER leave that...

You are looking to WIN 1 unit regardless of whether it is a +money bet or not, most of us don't play that way, we RISK 1 unit on +money bets. The bonus money on the +money bets is the reason we play...

*****

Actually, you lost money doing this if/when TB wins their series. You will not recover the extra units that would have been generated on the +money Toronto bet for those units you canceled, unless...

Yes, you lost an extra .35 units for every unit you canceled out.

Well then you have to change your rules to state that if a team wins/loses three games in a row that the pitcher STARTS, then it is a play, apparently the pitcher doesn't have to be the pitcher of...

I already won the Buehrle chases back in game 2 so I'm in the clear on that. I was at work for those bets and bet both Toronto game 2 against the Yankees, forgetting it was a pitcher chase. Luckily...

That's a good point. Toronto won the first three games he started, but he only got 1 win. The rules say a PITCHER has to be on a winning/losing streak to make their next start a play. He only has one...

The new bet is a fade, the old one (D) is the chase.

This is actually bad advice for MLB betting. You know I was a big fan of skipping head-head bets in NBA, but do not agree it should be played this way in MLB.

When we we're betting NBA games, both...

As you said "who cares what you do personally" if you are afraid of a D bet size. At least post accurate system results without these bullshit soccer parlays. No wonder you records look so good from...

I'm sorry, it's only 4 systems, I forgot that I am not playing JM this year. I am playing this system (the way it is SUPPOSED to be played), an over/under system that I've been toying with, and two...

Incredible. I am playing 5 systems and today went 14-1 with several C bets and one D bet. Best day of the year to date. Damn Lester blew a perfect day. Lol.

I believe the T. Hudson P1 and P2 bets should be (C) bets, correct?

You're right, the good teams in sports never lose, why don't we bet them all.

If you say so. But just a few posts ago you were asking who in the hell this team even was. If you consider good money management to be throwing money on a team that you never even heard of just...

Me either. I agree with you, play it the way it's supposed to be played or hide under your table and wait for it to pass.

It's never a poor idea if both teams are a M/L play regardless of which bet in progression it is. Subtract the two and play the difference, especially in baseball. Not necessarily the best play if...

Usually, unless they did a lot of throwing on the day of the cancelled game.

You can't bet "action" with +1 1/2 lines, you can usually only do that on M/L bets.