really?
so you think what happened to Real1992 is ok?
SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks
|
Best Sportsbooks List
|
| |||||
#1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
#3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
#4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
#5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review |
Type: Posts; User: Hareeba! Search by Threads Advanced Search View New Posts
really?
so you think what happened to Real1992 is ok?
So the poll closes with a decisive victory to Pinnacle with it's new 5 times wagering requirement else 3% deposit fee charge.
Wonder how many might change their mind when they cop an unexpected...
Where did you get that from?
And how does it reconcile with the treatment handed out to Real1992?
If you lose every cent it seems that the slate is clean. But on seeing what happened to Real1992 it seems that if you have a few pennies left over from your prior deposit you still have to rollover...
Yeah well it will be interesting to see if you still feel that way if they tell you that you still need to wager another four times what you've lost before you can avoid paying a 3% deposit fee as...
Don't know about any deleted thread. I think there were a couple and the posts got merged? but Real1992 started this thread:...
That one I do know the answer to.
It's NO.
low margins get horribly eroded when we get stung like Real1992 was
I see the Yes vote is starting to pull away ahead of the No votes now.
Bit surprised at that in view of the fact that we are still awaiting an explanation of the treatment handed out to Real1992
...
So you haven't read Real1992's posts then?
yes, I discovered that years ago and have questioned them about it as I know some books offer enhanced odds to encourage parlay taking
but in reality Pinnacle's parlay odds still beat the...
Pinnacle certainly good to have on side but not sufficiently superior to other options to warrant incurring the additional new overhead.
My prime source of income is racing and Pinnacle don't even...
So brokers aren't subject to this?
Certainly that thought never occurred to me.
I've no idea, never used nor needed to use a broker and very much doubt I ever will.
I've thought of a few things but given the contradictory responses from Pinnacle I can't be confident of anything.
Don't hold back, let's have the "obvious ... way around this rule"
I should probably have been a bit more specific with the question.
I shall continue to use Pinnacle to the extent of my current balance but I shall not be making any further deposits as long as...