Search: Search took 0.10 seconds.

  1. nash, if you believe those games are true...

    nash, if you believe those games are true coinflips, then you should be betting the dogs. Would be foolish to not take plus odds on a 50/50 proposition, if you have them pegged that way.
  2. Sounds like someone has a case of the "all-ins."...

    Sounds like someone has a case of the "all-ins." :lmao:

    Some people never learn. Nice work and it's a long season and grind. I never celebrate until the cash is in my pocket :shades:
  3. If teams aren't bringing effort every night and...

    If teams aren't bringing effort every night and they manage to make the playoffs, those players that were half-assing it would probably be more focused.

    However, I tend to agree with the premise...
  4. I meant in year's past--not sure this year. A lot...

    I meant in year's past--not sure this year. A lot of #1 picks will do that I suppose.
  5. A lot of analysts and gamblers have thrown out...

    A lot of analysts and gamblers have thrown out the Royals as a darkhorse.
  6. Trying to remember the last time, going into the...

    Trying to remember the last time, going into the season, that the Royals weren't the sexy pick. Hopefully they prove backers right this year--I've always liked and rooted for smaller market teams.
  7. Nash, no mention of the BP's in your analysis?...

    Nash, no mention of the BP's in your analysis? BP's are important, but they're extra important early on in the season, as SP's nerves are going to be present for their first starts.

    EDIT: lower...
  8. If you guys are planning on backing the Pads,...

    If you guys are planning on backing the Pads, which I might entertain, wait a bit. The public will hammer the Dodgers win or lose after CBB, NHL, and NBA.
Results 1 to 8 of 8