Search:

Sorry ..... it's favourite-longshot. Basically pretty much any book pricing always puts more juice on the bigger dogs, and conversely little to no juice on the big favourites.

Lazy quick example:...

That's probably just a natural result of the extremely dominant results of the top guys. When you're charging 8% juice, any fav much above 90% is rapidly tending towards a 1.0000000000000000 "fair"...

How so? That's just comparing one set of implied probabilities with another (and at least in tennis, pinnacle's closers are historically more accurate than betfair).

I'm comparing implied...

I'd assume so, yes. I've only done it for tennis, which has a tidy 2800ish matches a year (2300 if you exclude those troublesome 5-setters).

The major issues for me are more ....

a) the...

Take past results, calculate juice in different odds bands, and make a formula. For instance, in tennis most of the juice is on the dogs (although less so with closers).

There will be all sorts of...