View New Posts
  1. #1

    Default 10/30 Plays

    Kohlschrieber -200 (3u)

    Cilic -235 (1u)

  2. #2

  3. #3

    Default

    i actually lean Melzer in that match, though its a no play

  4. #4

    Default

    Damn, missed the Kohlschrieber bet, gl, will have to ride with Cilic instead

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ulver86 View Post
    Kohlschrieber -200 (3u)

    Cilic -235 (1u)
    Laying down the chalk I see - big change from yesterday

    I agree with your picks - good work!

  6. #6

    Default

    theres a difference between picking -200 plays (which means you should win them back about 68% of the time or better) and laying -600 and up plays.

    You haven't figured out the difference apparently.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ulver86 View Post
    theres a difference between picking -200 plays (which means you should win them back about 68% of the time or better) and laying -600 and up plays.

    You haven't figured out the difference apparently.
    So are you telling me your own personal picks of -200 or better are hitting 68% of the time or is that a statistic that you can reference in general? Just interested in seeing where you get that number.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tsonga View Post
    So are you telling me your own personal picks of -200 or better are hitting 68% of the time or is that a statistic that you can reference in general? Just interested in seeing where you get that number.
    Sounds like you have some things to learn about odds

    a -200 bet theoretically hits 2 out of every 3 times to break even, 66.6666%, so basically you should hit those 67/68% of the time or better if you want to win any money

    maybe you should take the time to learn some basic math?

  9. #9

    Default

    thanks for educating me o master of mathematics

Top