View New Posts
12
  1. #1

    Thumbs up Federer at -318? Gettin' down before oddsmakers adjust for reality..

    When handicapping majors, an important and useful way of analyzing matches is to look not for how a player has done that tournament, but instead look for how that players performances are perceived by the betting public and in turn, the oddsmakers.

    This sounds simple, but in tennis it is most effective because you are not betting on a team sport. There is no homecourt advantage less a player hails from the state that the major is being held at, and even in that specific scenario there is no HCA which is factored into the betting line.

    There are really not as many angles to evaluate in betting majors as people believe there are, recent performances really do not matter, it's the perception and how that perception influences and shape the line that is most valuable to determine.

    Case in point: #2 Roger Federer at -318 against #10 Gael Monfils. What do we know that has been already factored into the line? Could it be Federer's 13 Major Titles? Or Monfils big fat zero titles? Or could it be the fact that Federer was down two sets to love this morning, and came back miraculously?

    All of that and more. It's already in this line, but what's also factored into the line is the squares are afraid to lay the price on Federer, now more than ever. With Rafa Nadal losing as -5200 chalk just two days ago, and Federer coming out the very next day and being on the brink of elimination as a -1500 favorite, everyone from the $10 to the $10,000 bettor are going to think very carefully before making a wager on any price that is preceded by a "-".

    Now, none of the above is new information, it's not groundbreaking, but it's the simplicities behind majors (and sportsbetting in general) which are so incredibly hard for the unsophisticated bettor to compute. I'm not going to get into quantifying edges, or betting Kelly, or even spell out in-depth ways of analyzing data, because quite frankly I had to learn on my own too.

    All I can tell you is the question(s) you should ask, the answers are entirely up to you to discover. Only when you learn something yourself does it stick, I could give you the key to beating tennis and it would fall on deaf ears.

    Here's what you need to ask:
    Where will this line close?
    What's the fair value of this line?
    At what point would I consider this no play?

    Right now it's at -318- and that's at Pinnacle Sports. I can all but guarantee lesser rated and less tennis oriented sportsbooks are hanging a line that is slightly to majorly worse.

    Even at Pinnacle Sports this line will get worse, I will go ahead and say ~-344 closing as a conservative estimate, but I can easily see that being off by another .20 or so.

    Taking to win 1 unit..

  2. #2

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CrazyLou View Post
    I'm not going to get into quantifying edges, or betting Kelly, or even spell out in-depth ways of analyzing data, because quite frankly I had to learn on my own too.
    Who taught you? Broke Landers?

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  4. #4

    Default

    Did u see Monfils today? He almost made Roddick cry he beat him so badly, dude is a beast on clay

  5. #5

  6. #6

    Default

    Monfils it is... Thanks Lou. Appreciate the fade material

  7. #7

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bettilimbroke999 View Post
    Did u see Monfils today? He almost made Roddick cry he beat him so badly, dude is a beast on clay

  9. #9

    Default

    I'm so happy your on Federer and your reasons for picking him are just awful at least come up with something credible. You shouldn't underestimate Monfils so much, at least watch the guy first, you obviously haven't because you wouldn't have claimed that there's "no home court advantage".

  10. #10

    Default

    Wow, the audacity of this guy to preach about how to cap tennis when he is getting fukkin demolished in this tournament.

    Maybe you should be scared to lay chalk after getting fukked 2-3 times already laying worse than -500!

    Sorry Crazy, but the squares are always on the big name players. Monfils is obviously the play here, but even moreso because you like Federer.

  11. #11

    Default

    [Also, we appreciate you telling us how a $10,000 bettor thinks. I've always wondered. Thanks Lou]

  12. #12

    Default

    Good luck, Lou. I am rooting for Federer as a bettor and tennis fan.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  13. #13

    Default

    just play the game as you see it lou. lots of unforeseen upsets have proven why big chalk doesnt always pay off. it happens sometimes. you have been way off on some analysis, but so have others. thats the worst match ive seen out of roddick in a long long time and it had little to do with who he was playing. people that bet against federer have a nice comfy place in the street right next to the people who bet against tiger.

  14. #14

    Default

    this makes my monfils play SO much stronger.

  15. #15

    Default

    If he has such good odds on Federer to win the whole thing shouldn't he be hedging his opponents as long as they are at least +200 against him? I am not a good tennis capper, but quite frankly with the way he French Open has gone I think I would take +300 against most any opponent (especially in the QF), if I had +1200 to win the entire tournament.

  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Seinfeld View Post
    If he has such good odds on Federer to win the whole thing shouldn't he be hedging his opponents as long as they are at least +200 against him?
    NO.

    If you recognize the equity of that +1150, or the basic concept of ''hedging'' you will find that in most every case it is significantly -EV and foolish.

    This would be a monumental example of just that.

  17. #17

  18. #18

    Default

    Here I have to disagree, Lou. I've been with you throughout and I picked Federer at 13/1 when you posted the Great odds on approx May 7, but I am seriously thinking of a hedge because I am solely seeking One thing. Profit, even a small one. I'll take a small grinding profit over sweating out a bigger profit margin most any situation. Over the years I have argued the concept of hedging with many gamblers, but another gambler cannot win the argument if the bettor he is debating with is making the balance larger no matter the increments. I think I made a mistake not hedging at minus $1.35 heading into Monday morning on Federer Not winning the French Open.

    No -135
    Yes +1300

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  19. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CrazyLou View Post
    NO.

    If you recognize the equity of that +1150, or the basic concept of ''hedging'' you will find that in most every case it is significantly -EV and foolish.

    This would be a monumental example of just that.
    I guess it depends on how much value you think your +1150 still has. Again I am a bit of a newb and tennis is not my game. Just seems like a lot of chalk to lay out for a QF tennis match after playing 5 sets. But again your level of information and knowledge I pray exceeds mine.

    GL the rest of the way!

  20. #20

    Default

    Recent win/loss is mostly irrelevant. I've gone through 30-unit winning and losing streaks. What is more important is the analysis that goes into a match.

    Lou has some good ideas. He said "
    Where will this line close?
    What's the fair value of this line?
    At what point would I consider this no play?"

    This response is dead on. The $64k question he needs to explain is: "What is the fair value of this line"? Everything else is moot without a strong analysis of this.

  21. #21

    Default

    The only question is who wins and who loses.
    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/31/2012


  22. #22

    Default

    "I'm not going to get into quantifying edges"
    got to love it.

  23. #23
    jjgold's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 07-20-05
    Posts: 126,278
    Message Me

    Default

    I do not know what skill their is in picking all these big favs

    Lou has to be joking with his tennis plays just for some good discussion and it has worked.

    Successful tennis cappers hit the dogs consistently

    Fed can easily lose

    SBR Founder Join Date: 7/20/2005


  24. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jjgold View Post
    Lou has to be joking with his tennis plays just for some good discussion and it has worked.
    I believe he is doing this - very very good marketing skills - that is why he is paid by SBR.

  25. #25

    Default

    for a change i agree with crazyl that federer is going to win, i dont like -420 line though, i think if sets betting around -3.5 or -4 games federer would worth a shot. i feel it will be an easy win for federer 6-4 6-3 6-2

  26. #26

    Default

    Disagree with that shaker. If Federer wins and seeing as how Lou is the JINX of all jinxes right now, that is a big IF ... Monfils will win at least a set IMO. Won't be easy for Federer, not unless he pulls the best match of the tournament out of his ass.
    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/31/2012


  27. #27

  28. #28

    Default

    Seems they are adjusting for reality.

    Federer now -307.

  29. #29

  30. #30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CrazyLou View Post
    Even at Pinnacle Sports this line will get worse, I will go ahead and say ~-344 closing as a conservative estimate, but I can easily see that being off by another .20 or so.
    Off by over .40 at the moment.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  31. #31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by reno cool View Post
    "I'm not going to get into quantifying edges"
    got to love it.

  32. #32

    Default

    Federer's serve looks pretty sharp, only a matter of time till he starts breaking.

    The replies typically get quiet. Perhaps a blind fade was not +EV?

  33. #33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sickler View Post
    I see -301 at Pinny.
    Closed at -320.

  34. #34
    yisman's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 09-01-08
    Posts: 42,207
    SBR Points: 580
    Message Me

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irish Jet View Post
    I was going to make this play.

    Not anymore.
    I would've taken Monfils at a higher price, but it was way too low when I looked last night. Not interested at +300 or so.

    First set tiebreaker coming up.
    150pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY7th Place 5/29/2012

    5,880

    SBR POKER TOP 100

    96th Place 11/1/2011

    iPad
    WINNER
    SBR Casino 10/31/2011

    400pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY1st Place 5/30/2012


  35. #35
    yisman's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 09-01-08
    Posts: 42,207
    SBR Points: 580
    Message Me

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CrazyLou View Post
    Federer's serve looks pretty sharp, only a matter of time till he starts breaking.
    You have got to be joking. This is your conclusion from the first set?
    150pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY7th Place 5/29/2012

    5,880

    SBR POKER TOP 100

    96th Place 11/1/2011

    iPad
    WINNER
    SBR Casino 10/31/2011

    400pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY1st Place 5/30/2012


12 Last
Top