[madflacker]

I have a beef with the fact that you guys have Sportsbetting.com rated higher than Sports.com.

Sports.com has always paid me over time. When I pick up the phone, the person I talk with can do investigation on the ETA of funds, and acknowledges whenever there's a delay, and provides information.

In my current dispute with Sportsbetting.com, they feed me the same b.s. over and over. They freakin bounced checks to me 5 weeks ago and haven't even made a motion that would indicate they're going to take care of it.

You have the two flip-flopped in the order of what they should be in your ratings, IMHO. (and sportsbetting.com should be an F black-lister)

[iggles]

I have to disagree with you. Sportsbetting.com has had problems as well as sports.com. I just made a withdrawal from sportsbetting.com and got my check within one week. I have waited weeks for a withdrawal from sports.com as well as other sites affilated with them. I think SBR ratings are accurate

[Bill Dozer]

Sports.com has a low rating because they routinely steal from winning players.

[Justin7]

Sports.com are crooks. If you win big, don't expect to get paid.

Sportsbetting.com has separated itself from the Sportsbook.com family - they have rejected SB's management decisions, and paid players when SB robbed them.