[pirate]

You got in 15 bets?? I got cut from 5000 to 500 after 3 bets

[dante1]

God, I didn't see this before my new thread. I believe something happened with this book. They have a new philosophy or something and that is no winners allowed. It seems they are structuring their rules to make it next to impossible to win. Didn't know they cut limits, never did that to me because I never won there.

Those huge bonus amounts are not really player friendly although most people would argue with me about that, but they are wrong. Deposit 1000 and you need to roll that over what 10 or 12 times. That is okay if that is what you want and you understand the chances of doing that. I am fine with that. But, if you don't want it you should be able to get a two or three or four time roll with a small bonus. However, they don't want that. They used to fall all over me before I told them I don't want a big bonus. Now, they don't even return my emails. That can't be just chance.

That settles it I am done with this book, back to Bookmaker or BJ or 5 dimes. Never an issue with these guys.

Guys and gals think twice about these big bonus amounts. They wouldn't be offering them if people were beating them consistently.

That settles it, this is a bad book and I will not deposit there.

[big joe 1212]

What are The Chief's thoughts on waving roll overs for players who have their limits cut after 15 or so bets?

send him a PM and ask

[big joe 1212]

God, I didn't see this before my new thread. I believe something happened with this book. They have a new philosophy or something and that is no winners allowed. It seems they are structuring their rules to make it next to impossible to win. Didn't know they cut limits, never did that to me because I never won there.

Those huge bonus amounts are not really player friendly although most people would argue with me about that, but they are wrong. Deposit 1000 and you need to roll that over what 10 or 12 times. That is okay if that is what you want and you understand the chances of doing that. I am fine with that. But, if you don't want it you should be able to get a two or three or four time roll with a small bonus. However, they don't want that. They used to fall all over me before I told them I don't want a big bonus. Now, they don't even return my emails. That can't be just chance.

That settles it I am done with this book, back to Bookmaker or BJ or 5 dimes. Never an issue with these guys.

Guys and gals think twice about these big bonus amounts. They wouldn't be offering them if people were beating them consistently.

That settles it, this is a bad book and I will not deposit there.

For smaller bettors who deposit smaller amounts, it's a great book! Smaller deposits make the rollover easier to accomplish.

Why don't you just deposit a smaller amount and then re-up if you bust out? It makes meeting the rollover a lot easier.

[jonny]

For smaller bettors who deposit smaller amounts, it's a great book! Smaller deposits make the rollover easier to accomplish.

Why don't you just deposit a smaller amount and then re-up if you bust out? It makes meeting the rollover a lot easier.

Everything should be relative no matter how much you are betting. you are not thinking intelligently.

[Wagerchief]

I am more than willing to work with players all of you know that , if your limits were cut maybe we can revise them we dont do cut players often.

PM me and I will give you a hand.

CHEERS!

THE CHIEF

[big joe 1212]

They bumped me up to $500 for the time being. I'm not going to S their D for doing the right thing, but they did address the issue quickly and were much more open to discussion than virtually every other shop I've dealt with this at.

good to hear!

[austin]

do they take players from outside north america?

[flyingillini]

Why isn't Wagerchief in the SBR Pro program? They did a couple of contests and were plastered all over the forum at one time. Bring Back Reagan Youth Jon, Sheer Terror, Madball, Mereudar

[DukeJohn]

For smaller bettors who deposit smaller amounts, it's a great book! Smaller deposits make the rollover easier to accomplish.

Why don't you just deposit a smaller amount and then re-up if you bust out? It makes meeting the rollover a lot easier.

Everything should be relative no matter how much you are betting. you are not thinking intelligently.

Umm, if you are a $100 bettor and you have a x12 roll-over with 50% bonus. Then a deposit of $500 which is a rollover of $9,000 is much easier to do than a rollover of a deposit of $2,000 which is a rollover of $36,000. So, there are differences.

I might add, I usually don't care what the rollover is, I mean I am working on a $225K rollover from Bet Phoenix and a $75K rollover from Bet Guardian, plus a couple of other smaller ones.

The problem is mainly if the book begins to decline, I can't get my money out. I just happen to get my money out of WSEX right before it fell, but if I was stuck in a $225K rollover, I doubt I would have ever seen that money.

[jonny]

Umm, if you are a $100 bettor and you have a x12 roll-over with 50% bonus. Then a deposit of $500 which is a rollover of $9,000 is much easier to do than a rollover of a deposit of $2,000 which is a rollover of $36,000. So, there are differences.

unsurprisingly, you provided two variables for the smaller player in your argument, and one for the guy depositing $2k. your logic is flawed. figure it out.

[DukeJohn]

unsurprisingly, you provided two variables for the smaller player in your argument, and one for the guy depositing $2k. your logic is flawed. figure it out.

Nope... not going too, if you want to continue then please state what you perceive as flawed.