[tbill11]

I think they're owned by the same company but want to make sure? Does Chief use BetPhoenix lines? And are all the same games offered?

[Vince Lombardi]

Not good.

[smitch124]

roughly they are the same, but I have seen slight differences in the 2.

The games offered have been the same so far as I have noticed, a difference in the parlay rules for soccer I have noticed though.

[BET THE HOOK]

Some of the lines are a little different. I hate it that Richard set it so we can do tennis parlays an BP but the other 2 sister books wont allow tennis parlays for love or money.

[tltaylor89]

BP has alot of issues

[skrtelfan]

The lines appear to be the same but Wagerchief increases their juice faster. So a line that's ov +119 un -139 at BP would be ov +118 un -140 at Wagerchief.

[THE PROFIT]

The wagerchief contest that everyone is bitching about had BP lines. BP had the crazy odds. If nobody wanted to play them why didn't they click on general, which I assume is donbest, & bet the regular line at -110. The people who bet colts+7.5 thought they had an easy point but lost 9 & are pretty much out of the contest. The ones who bet saints-7.5 were really going out on a limb for a longshot 6 points & have a better chance to win now. That's what gambling is!

[tbill11]

Well truthfully, for 400 points I'm very inclined to give WagerChief the nod with my points. They seem to offer a lot of games, are a reliable book and have nice payout policies. Anybody have anything to sway me the other way?