| Poster's Sportsbook Poll: 2011View Poll Results | ||
| # 1 5Dimes | 450 total points | 5Dimes Review |
| # 2 Pinnacle | 408 total points | Pinnacle Review |
| # 3 Heritage | 227 total points | Heritage Review |
| # 4 Bookmaker | 138 total points | Bookmaker Review |
| # 5 BetIslands | 129 total points | BetIslands Review |
| SBR Top-Rated SportsbooksRecommended List | ||
| Pinnacle Sports | SBR Rating A+ | Pinnacle Sports Review |
| 5Dimes | SBR Rating A+ | 5Dimes Review |
| BookMaker | SBR Rating A+ | BookMaker Review |
| Legends | SBR Rating A+ | Legends Review |
| Bodog | SBR Rating A | Bodog Review |
The player did nothing wrong, except use his brain. WSEX did not make this right as far as I know.
I'm not sure trixtrix's post reflects exactly what happened. I didn't see anything suggesting WSEX's advantage was different than normal if a player was flat-betting.
you concluded that the game was somewhat rigged in favor of the casino. While I didn't look for that, your analysis has assumptions that are wrong (such as winning 100% of the big bets, and losing 100% of the small bets).
I still think WSEX is in the wrong here, but not for running a rigged game. They're in the wrong for stiffing a casino winner that that did the equivalent of counting cards.
its this simple. if they say they have a random generator when they don't then they are ripping off everyone else who plays. If someone finds that and beats them, they should pay them and fix it. if not they should refund everyone who has every lost on that game. If i sell you chicken and tell you it's steak when its not i am decieving you. If they tell you their game is random when its not thats lying and cheating those who think it is. They should of paid this or refunded all who lost thinking it was random. If you say its random it needs to be random.
SBR POKER TOURNEY17th Place 5/30/2012
3-QUESTION
SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/31/2012
SBR POKER TOP 100
39th Place 11/1/2011
SBR POKER TOURNEY11th Place 5/31/2012