View New Posts
  1. 06-19-07 08:10 PM #1
    El Helado Patata
    El Helado Patata's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-19-06
    Posts: 96
    SBR Points: 0
    Message Me

    Default Sportingbet.com.au scam! - Sergio Roitman vs Philipp Kohlschreiber

    I bet on Sergio Roitman vs Philipp Kohlschreiber on Sportingbet.com.au and Roitman won. It was 6.5 in odds and I asked them why they didnt pay and they replied:

    Dear Client,

    Thank-you for your email, the bet Sergio Roitman vs Philipp Kohlschreiber has been resulted as an abandoned meeting. This is due to Philipp Kohlschreiber retiring during the match, therefore all bets are void and stakes are returned.

    If you have any further enquires please do not hesitate to contact us.

    Kind Regards

    Customer Service
    But according to the sites that did NOT happen. Roitman won.

    (look here) http://www.tennisinsight.com/matchid...sch-401008.htm

    and look here

    http://tennis.enetpulse.com/mdets.php?id=43268.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 06-19-07 09:32 PM #2
    JBrown1045
    JBrown1045's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-19-07
    Posts: 228
    SBR Points: 6
    Message Me

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by El Helado Patata View Post
    I bet on Sergio Roitman vs Philipp Kohlschreiber on Sportingbet.com.au and Roitman won. It was 6.5 in odds and I asked them why they didnt pay and they replied:



    But according to the sites that did NOT happen. Roitman won.

    (look here) http://www.tennisinsight.com/matchid...sch-401008.htm

    and look here

    http://tennis.enetpulse.com/mdets.php?id=43268.
    Man, thats not a scam. Roitman did win but retirement. However it seems Sportingbet is a Match completed for action sportsbook. Therefore since the match wasn't completed till end, wagers would be cancelled.
    Last edited by JBrown1045; 06-19-07 at 09:57 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 06-20-07 12:46 AM #3
    bigboydan
    bigboydan's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-10-05
    Posts: 53,903
    SBR Points: 0
    Message Me

    Default

    Most books implemented this rule due to the U.S. Open rain outs a few years back. I personally hated it myself, because I would be winning the entire match with a 400+ live dog, and get screwed out of the winner due to the player retiring.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005

  4. 06-21-07 12:56 AM #4
    Dhuepaxuz
    Dhuepaxuz's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-19-07
    Posts: 293
    SBR Points: 0
    Message Me

    Default

    99.9% of the Books now-a-days have the same policy (rule).

    It su*ks because many times it's money in the bank and then realize that it was a void.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 06-21-07 09:00 AM #5
    El Helado Patata
    El Helado Patata's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-19-06
    Posts: 96
    SBR Points: 0
    Message Me

    Default

    99.9% of the books does NOT have the same ruling with retiring. There is 4 major ones and its seems to be pretty equally spread.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 06-21-07 11:19 AM #6
    BigBollocks
    BigBollocks's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-11-06
    Posts: 2,042
    SBR Points: 0
    Message Me

    Default

    Play your underdogs at books with one ball or one set minimums (such as 5Dimes), and play your favourites at books with entire match must be completed stipulations.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 11-24-07 10:00 PM #7
    mikes
    mikes's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-24-07
    Posts: 2
    SBR Points: 0
    Message Me

    Default

    where is the policy - they're a crappy bookie.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Top
« Previous Thread | Sportsbooks & The Industry | Next Thread »