[Justin7]

Are you serious?

[Emily_Haines]

These are the first steps they take in closing your account.

[Justin7]

These are the first steps they take in closing your account.

If they closed my account and paid me, that would be fine. But I have a 5-figure rollover to hit...

[LVHerbie]

Slightly off-topic but shouldn't the ripping off bookmaker's slogan tell you something?

[durito]

better prices on either side with nearly unlimited liquidity everywhere. why do you care?

[Hareeba!]

better prices on either side with nearly unlimited liquidity everywhere. why do you care?

he has a rollover to make

[durito]

he has a rollover to make

right, but they have plenty of other shit he can bet on at not shit prices. yet he starts this thread to brag that another book cut his limits. oh wow.

it's a usa facing book, you aren't gonna be able to bet much on tennis, grand slam final or not.

[Justin7]

better prices on either side with nearly unlimited liquidity everywhere. why do you care?

Anytime I bet at tennis at Heritage, the price is probably better than the Pinny price 5 minutes later. Do you have any clue about tennis liquidity, or do you just like to see yourself post? If there were unlimited liquidity, I would not be betting at Heritage (or BetOnline, Bookmaker, or others for that matter).

[shari91]

I still struggle to see why it makes the slightest difference to you whether the Heritage limit is USD 100 or USD 2000 (rollover not withstanding).

Money is coming in giant lumps for Nadal on Betfair and the odds have moved by 2c since yesterday. I am guessing the picture at Pinny is similar.

[Justin7]

I still struggle to see why it makes the slightest difference to you whether the Heritage limit is USD 100 or USD 2000.

Money is coming in giant lumps for Nadal on Betfair and the odds have moved by 2c since yesterday. I am guessing the picture at Pinny is fairly similar at Pinny.

Now you are asking more relevant questions.

Why would a book limit a player to $100 on a super liquid market? 1. Is their risk management totally incompetent? 2. Or do they want to harass the player? 3. Or is there some other reason?

Durito noted that there are other markets with a lot of value there. Which of the three suggested possibilities does that coincide with?

[Justin7]

On a random note, Djok and under are the right sides.

[minet123]

On a random note, Djok and under are the right sides.

-Gambling vocabulary clarification-
The only right side is the side that cashes

[shari91]

On a random note, Djok and under are the right sides.

Listen you, I will concede that my Nadal bet might take a bit of stars aligning and humidity continuing to rise for it to come off, but I do like my over 3.5 sets bet. No way would I take the over in this one so hopefully we both hit that one at least. (And Nadal wins of course )

[minet123]

Listen you, I will concede that my Nadal bet might take a bit of stars aligning and humidity continuing to rise for it to come off, but I do like my over 3.5 sets bet. No way would I take the over in this one so hopefully we both hit that one at least. (And Nadal wins of course )

The Vegemite syndicate has spoken

[mtneer1212]

I'm with you Justin -- I'm on the Djoker

[Justin7]

I can't play at Heritage so I am not really qualified to comment. It could be a combination of all three from where I sit.

Their odds are already heavily shaded to the side you want to bet so again, I don't really see what difference it makes to you.

I wouldn't bet this particular match there. But there are dozens of matches I would bet each week, if they had reasonable limits.

[LordVodka]

Hey, Justin, can I PM you a question about 5dimes?

[durito]

Anytime I bet at tennis at Heritage, the price is probably better than the Pinny price 5 minutes later. Do you have any clue about tennis liquidity, or do you just like to see yourself post? If there were unlimited liquidity, I would not be betting at Heritage (or BetOnline, Bookmaker, or others for that matter).

i forgot you are the big timer that plays half scalps on $440 limit markets at SIA. never occurred to me that you were betting 250k on tennis matches

and sorry i got tossed from heritage quite sometime ago like everyone else

[durito]

Now you are asking more relevant questions.

Why would a book limit a player to $100 on a super liquid market? 1. Is their risk management totally incompetent? 2. Or do they want to harass the player? 3. Or is there some other reason?

Durito noted that there are other markets with a lot of value there. Which of the three suggested possibilities does that coincide with?

cause none of their clients (squares) are betting tennis there?

what are your ncaab total limits there? soccer? try betting a few games and see where they end up.

it's a recreational us facing book, what do you want.

[yisman]

Heritage's lines on the men's final are unbettable.

[Monte]

I doubt that noone cares for tennis finals, all these threads here show otherwise...
All they'd have to do is copy lines and take the action.
But Heritage is either too stubborn or stupid, it doesn't get any easier than such big markets for a bookmaker...

[wisky]

100.00 limit ?????? Slap in the face ........congrats

[Dark Horse]

The Heritage many of us spoke of here in such glowing terms no longer exists, and it will never come back.

[wtt0315]

justin file a complaint with sbr.. maybe justin can help you

[skrtelfan]

I had a book that gave me a $50 limit on the Australian open final and there's no way I'm ahead there more than $5000 lifetime on tennis since they only offer the later rounds of the grand slam. It happens.

[jmk2178]

Heritage sucks, kicking me out because I was talking bad about them on this forum, bunch of BS, little kids