[SBR Lou]

Hi Marco,

The extra paperwork is usually required if the card used is in a shared database as having disputed a charge. If that's not the case, you can write to help@sportsbookreview.com if you need assistance but it sounds like it's just a matter of obliging their request at this point.

[durito]

bookmaker would ask for the same thing.

[durito]

Hi Marco,

The extra paperwork is usually required if the card used is in a shared database as having disputed a charge. If that's not the case, you can write to help@sportsbookreview.com if you need assistance but it sounds like it's just a matter of obliging their request at this point.

it has nothing to do with chargebacks, every book asks for documents if you deposit by cc. when you don't still have the card it becomes a pain.

[sharpcat]

This thread is worthless.

Nothing to see here folks just another player running to the forum before the book has a chance to resolve the issue.

[firedawg]

wtf is wrong with people... any book would do the same

[SBR Lou]

it has nothing to do with chargebacks, every book asks for documents if you deposit by cc. when you don't still have the card it becomes a pain.

If a player is within the dispute charge window, yes every book will request them. He said it's an old account however, so that is one reason they could be insisting. Since the player says the card wasn't a throwaway, it sounds like he can oblige their request with a little effort on his part in any case.

[firedawg]

So I got it wrong never had to show docs with bookmaker because i deposited using **

[Birre]

Change thread title to "Sportsbetting.com asks for legit documents"

[Thremp]

lol @ this thread

I think he offered a perfectly valid workaround and this group is being unfair. Books also struggle to understand that a lost CC will have a different number than before. Lose a CC before validation, BOOM. Impossible to provide a scan of the card.

[SBR Lou]

Marco,

Have you ever disputed a charge associated with gaming?

[Thremp]

Why does that matter?

If he disputed a charge, why can they hold his money hostage on the backend? Funny how they accept deposits from someone who you want to cast aspersions on (the doubt of being a cheat, despite charging back being considered a logical move from some of the thefts that SBR has come out against), yet you're so quick to say that OP must provide supernormal proof to withdraw. I don't even see why they need CC verification past 90 days or so.

[durito]

Bodog tried to ask for similar documentation on a card I hadn't had for over 3 years. I said no, they processed my payouts anyway.

[goblue12]

Getting more and more difficult to find consistent value at this website.

[austin]

Why does that matter?

exactly. that aside sportsbettingcom is a scam shop in the first place. when i got fooled into depositing there (via ewallet), came time to withdraw, they asked for an unreal amount of docs

[patswin]

i like this place, been there for a few years with no problems

[NSN21]

i like this place, been there for a few years with no problems

I've also been here for a couple of years and haven't had any problems myself (yet).

[dark_knight]

Another good word for this place here :-) Was asked for a lot of documents after my first cashout but they were reasonable about it and verified them quickly. Since then cashouts always processed quickly, 3 days or so after request.

[relaaxx]

great place - until limits are lowered to where it's not worth playing there happens

[Bulldog-53]

Not a bad site, they will cut your limits in a heartbeat though...