[sammy85]

http://www.wagerweb.com/

[Chopsticks]

robmpink uses them I think so maybe message him. I have a funded account there but so far I have found little reason to bet there. Unless you are specifically looking for something different then you should stick with one of the books at the top of this page.

[robmpink]

Sammy, I have used them for the past 5 years. It depends of what you are after. Yes, you will find better low juice lines out there. Sometimes their baseball props are a better price vs 5 Dimes. They offer a wide variety.

Their horseracing max payout limits are a up there 20k I think for major tracks. Two casinos. Sameday payouts. Good bonuses.

Their loyalty program is good. Customer service is good.

For me it is one stop shopping, with the horse limits, sports, and casino. It made things easier.

[Eagle1958]

I agree with Rob and rate them a top notch organization.

[HeeeHAWWWW]

Terrible book, avoid.

[NEW_WORLD]

sometimes i wonder how some members can say about bookies great words and some worst?
heeehawwww, please axplayn why they are terrible?
i use enough bookies, willhill, stanjames, bet365, pinny, sbobet and i always know in which market which bookie is good or worst.
when somebody asks about bookie he wants to know + or - to open account or avoid.
i think we all are here because help each others, not only for points etc.
your post is useless for sammy, i think, and for me.
no attack, just friendly answer about your post.
Best regards

[tomcowley]

Lying, thieving scammers, just like easystreet. http://www.sportsbookreview.com/sbr/wagerweb/

[Justin7]

Stay far, far away.

[RickySteve]

Borderline losers-only book.

[robmpink]

Lying, thieving scammers, just like easystreet. http://www.sportsbookreview.com/sbr/wagerweb/

Tom did you ever play there? I assume you will say you wouldn't play there ever. Case in point you can offer you real value to this.

[Doug]

SHIT book that used to be very good years ago ( as Casablanca).

[scarface]

the correlated parlays incident was a way for justin7 to get wagerweb to pay sbr for good ratings...he found a glitch in the system and ww told him that if he bet it, ww would take the money back, he did it anyways....

wagerweb is a solid book.

[tomcowley]

LOL where do people come up with this shit? The player wasn't told not to bet them, Justin7 wasn't the player involved, and Justin7 has minimal financial interest in SBR (he wouldn't have a mediation job with them if they went under, that's it), and the player has no financial interest in SBR at all. And the entire post is complete nonsense anyway. WW stole money from a player. Paying the PLAYER, which would have resulted in not being downgraded, wouldn't have even netted SBR a penny.

The stupid, it burns.

[scarface]

ignorance to something you have no information on other than what you read on this forum

[scarface]

i love how you have $20 players from no where (snip) trying to put their 2 cents into something they no nothing about (snip). you have no idea how this industry works or how sbr works, or how ratings works...i pity your ignorance in this matter because you believe everything you read, and that their is no way that my statement is possible...

[tomcowley]

I know the player who got robbed. I know Justin7. They aren't the same person. You're completely making shit up.

[scarface]

i am done throwing bones

[eyeball]

Explain

[eyeball]

What was written here on SBR was that another player not Justin was involved. I have used them only twice with no problem, most other sites rate them good. But for sure SBR has a thing against them.