[curious]

I'm waiting for a rabble rousing, venom spewing, war mongering, America First fanatic to run on a platform of destroying our enemies with every means at our disposal whether they are abroad or at home, repatriating the millions of jobs that the Democrats forced overseas with their ridiculous "anti-business" policies, and building a wall on the US border with Mexico and Canada along the lines of Hadrian's wall and stationing 500,000 border guards on the border to stop illegal immigration and illegal smuggling, and who calls the global warming nutjobs what they are...green on the outside, red on the inside. Someone who doesn't give a shit what the media thinks, and who says exactly what he means and means exactly what he says.

If a candidate like this emerges, he has my vote.

I would vomit if I voted for any of the lying yellow bellied cowards running for either party.

Something I cannot understand, how can Obama Bin Laden be a front runner of the Democratic party? Come on, the guy who perpetrated 9/11? Are the Democrats that insane?

[milwaukee mike]

youtube videos do not equal hard evidence, but norman mineta's SWORN TESTIMONY sure does.
proves that cheney lied about his whereabouts on 9/11 and gave a stand down order.
proof of treason.

but you suffer from confirmation bias perhaps?

what (other than tv news coverage) has provided you with the visual evidence necessary to convict bin laden? oh wait, he has yet to be tried OR EVEN HAVE CHARGES BROUGHT AGAINST HIM.
so who did it? an invisible man in a cave (google tim osman and ask yourself why we repeatedly let bin laden inspect our weapons facilities)?

[curious]

Originally Posted by milwaukee mike

youtube videos do not equal hard evidence, but norman mineta's SWORN TESTIMONY sure does.
proves that cheney lied about his whereabouts on 9/11 and gave a stand down order.
proof of treason.

but you suffer from confirmation bias perhaps?

what (other than tv news coverage) has provided you with the visual evidence necessary to convict bin laden? oh wait, he has yet to be tried OR EVEN HAVE CHARGES BROUGHT AGAINST HIM.
so who did it? an invisible man in a cave (google tim osman and ask yourself why we repeatedly let bin laden inspect our weapons facilities)?

So, Obama Bin Laden's constant claims to be the perpetrator of 9/11 mean what?

[milwaukee mike]

curious how do you think they could get billary to win?
run her against a black that sounds like osama and secretly smear him as a muslim.
chat it up for a year that the only 2 "major" democratic choices are hillary and obama.
"well, we don't want that black guy so i guess we have to vote for hillary..." just a small bother that we've already had 28 years of the same 2 crime families in the white house.
why not another 8 to sell the rest of the country down the river (nau) and across the ocean (china, cfr)?

[milwaukee mike]

sure he did. "constant claims??"
what, an unmarked video that we magically found in a major city? our troops had orders to just play every videotape in every home they saw in afghanistan with the hopes that it had confessions on it?
and you were born yesterday?
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/1...nladen.denial/

[curious]

Originally Posted by milwaukee mike

curious how do you think they could get billary to win?
run her against a black that sounds like osama and secretly smear him as a muslim.
chat it up for a year that the only 2 "major" democratic choices are hillary and obama.
"well, we don't want that black guy so i guess we have to vote for hillary..." just a small bother that we've already had 28 years of the same 2 crime families in the white house.
why not another 8 to sell the rest of the country down the river (nau) and across the ocean (china, cfr)?

If you think that southerners are going to let a lesbian murderess occupy the white house, you are crazy. The southern turnout is going to be a record number and southerners are going to vote for anyone who stands a chance of defeating the lesbian.

[milwaukee mike]

http://911review.org/Wiki/BinLaden.shtml

maybe check fbi.gov and you'll find BIN LADEN ISN'T EVEN A SUSPECT FOR THE CRIMES OF 9/11 BECAUSE (as the fbi put it) THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF HIS INVOLVEMENT.

[Willie Bee]

Originally Posted by curious

...southerners are going to vote against anyone who stands a chance of defeating the lesbian.

Ok, it's probably just me, early in the morning, second cup of coffee hasn't quite kicked in yet, but this statement confuses the poop out of me. First, I assume you are referring to Hillary Clinton as the "lesbian murderess," correct?

[curious]

Originally Posted by Willie Bee

Ok, it's probably just me, early in the morning, second cup of coffee hasn't quite kicked in yet, but this statement confuses the poop out of me. First, I assume you are referring to Hillary Clinton as the "lesbian murderess," correct?

How many other lesbian murderesses are running for President?

[BatemanPatrickl]

Originally Posted by curious

How many other lesbian murderesses are running for President?

Although I hate Democrats,I really hate uneducated little cry babies who post about how sick they are. Boo hoo, I am leaving the forum. WAH, WAH my lungs hurt.

Post some FACTS to back up your claim that she is a murdering lesbian.

[Willie Bee]

Originally Posted by curious

How many other lesbian murderesses are running for President?

I'm not sure. But that really wasn't my point.

Originally Posted by curious

The southern turnout is going to be a record number and southerners are going to vote against anyone who stands a chance of defeating the lesbian.

So you're saying that Southerners are going to turn out in record numbers to vote FOR Hillary Clinton? That's what confuses me, you say Southerners are going to vote AGAINST "anyone who stands a chance of defeating the lesbian." I assume someone with a chance to defeat Hillary would be a Republican, and if Southerners are going to vote AGAINST the GOP candidate, that pretty much just leaves Hillary herself and any third party nominee.

[BatemanPatrickl]

Originally Posted by Willie Bee

I'm not sure. But that really wasn't my point.


So you're saying that Southerners are going to turn out in record numbers to vote FOR Hillary Clinton? That's what confuses me, you say Southerners are going to vote AGAINST "anyone who stands a chance of defeating the lesbian." I assume someone with a chance to defeat Hillary would be a Republican, and if Southerners are going to vote AGAINST the GOP candidate, that pretty much just leaves Hillary herself and any third party nominee.

I think the southerners will vote against any Republican running for murdering lesbians who are running against Al Gore but running for Romney. Personally, I will vote for the guy behind the guy running up against any Northern candidate while living in the south with murdering lesbians.

Hope that makes sense...

[Willie Bee]

If he was alive, I'd write in Pat Paulsen. Come to think of it, a dead Pat Paulsen beats a live anything else running right now

[BatemanPatrickl]

Originally Posted by Willie Bee

If he was alive, I'd write in Pat Paulsen. Come to think of it, a dead Pat Paulsen beats a live anything else running right now

Both parties are weak right now; no murdering homosexuals though. Just lesbians...

I am kind of liking Romney right now; need to retire the Bush/Cheney gear

[capitalist pig]

This southern Republican, aint voting for Hillary, I wouldnt vote for her even if she ran on the platform of legalizing net wagering. The assualt weapon ban that expired a couple years ago, will be the 1st thing she tries to change if she gets elected, you know its for the children.

You know if my AK only has a 10 round mag its less likely to walk off by itself and kill anyone, but put that 30 rounder in it, and it might just be able to open the safe and commit crimes against the kids.

later