[Skanedogg]

BB:

West Va 2*

Specials...

COL ST 2*
TEX AM 2*
SO FLA 2*

tracks:
georgia
bobcats
warriors
heat

[Evenstar1907]

Lets cash them skane!

So far only WVU pick is really up there catching my eye. Line moved a lot in favor of Pitt, while public is on Pitt, fishy.

[Skanedogg]

agreed ... that one is high. we need the public to load up on Pitt

[BigRags]

looking like no by the #'s qualifiers tonight but we'll see, i don't even know if we ever got any BB, VR picks yesterday but Wisc. was a pure winner by the #'s. To me the BB stuff just confirms, I like this play in CBB if it meets qualification, over 9.5k and not in the RedZone 68-72, the RedZone plays and the ones under 60% are where BB's or VR's info would come into play for me. My bankroll is right now very grateful for this system, thanks a lot Skane, and if you follow it with disciplined unit betting I imagine it can be a cash machine over the long haul. But a warning for anyone, don't play with the #'s. If there are only 8k bets, then it doesn't fit even if its the only game to bet. Go ahead and bet it if you wish but you are on your own with that one and don't try to use it on the NBA, the only thing I've found with the NBA and this is just my own take no studies or anything, if there is huge action and its very tilted one way go with the action. If there is small action and heavily tilted one way, go with the action. Small you're following the Sharps, big you're just using common sense. In the middle you are on you own.

[Skanedogg]

bump... i just put the specials up. do with the tracks what you will

waitin on BB to tweet

VR just posted and said he will do it in a few min

[havana]

bump... i just put the specials up. do with the tracks what you will

waitin on BB to tweet

Do you have any picks for tonight.

[ger25pic25]

bump... i just put the specials up. do with the tracks what you will

waitin on BB to tweet

VR just posted and said he will do it in a few min

these specials are not based on the "system"..?

[broadway6]

he waits until 2 mins. before 7 on purpose

[MTN]

My impression is that they are, but the winning record isn't much better than 50-50, so play at your own risk, they're only being tracked to get more statistics under the belt before he decides to include them or not.

[cheechdagod]

anybody have VR's plays?

[ger25pic25]

But none of these plays fell into the 70% or so or the number of tickets rule. Do i miss something?

[Evenstar1907]

I think WVU is a pick right? Pitt fade?

[bhunter]

FADE PITT! Confirmed

[Skanedogg]

bump

[Evenstar1907]

Also a 2* play of VR

[smallball]

isnt it a pass since its only 69%

[khaden]

Wow barely got that one in lets go wv

[Skanedogg]

of course, the day after i say "i think we should move >70% and <9500 bets to 1*, there are 15 of the little boogers.

if you want, i think the 80% ones of these are good ... VCU, G Mason, Rice and Utep ... simply because that is a lot of action to be on small games. UGA is another i am playing because they were a "track" under the "specials." here is what i am playing (i always buy the 1/2)...

VCU -10 1*
WVA -10 2*
Gmason -1 1*
So Fla +13 2*
UGA -4 1* buy
rice -3 1* buy
col st +10 2* buy
tex am +10 2* buy
utep -7 1* buy

[Skanedogg]

the specials are not the fade/follow. they are what i was tracking when i noticed the fade/follow. the 2* specials are 9-0 since SUN ... the 1* specials (track only) have been hitting at 58% thus far, but i think will even out as that number has come down from near 70% since last Tues

[broadway6]

of course, the day after i say "i think we should move >70% and <9500 bets to 1*, there are 15 of the little boogers.

if you want, i think the 80% ones of these are good ... VCU, G Mason, Rice and Utep ... simply because that is a lot of action to be on small games. UGA is another i am playing because they were a "track" under the "specials." here is what i am playing (i always buy the 1/2)...

VCU -10 1*
WVA -10 2*
Gmason -1 1*
So Fla +13 2*
UGA -4 1* buy
rice -3 1* buy
col st +10 2* buy
tex am +10 2* buy
utep -7 1* buy

why tx am ?

[bhunter]

Baylor could be a system fade. Mentioned by BB, 74%, 8700 bets with 10 mins to go... Might not reach 9500 but its close enough for me to go with it.

[Skanedogg]

The problem is that games with >70% and <9500 are 11-3 as follows

now that I look at it, we could have played vcu, fm, xav, uga, char, bay, rice, and utep under the >70, <9500 rule (11-3)

[BigRags]

what up wit Kansas, i don't like laying the 14 and I had to buy the hook to get that, but they fit every criteria for a by the numbers play. just surprised i haven't even seen that game mentioned, i went one unit but like I said I am playing this completely by the numbers on ones that absolutely fit the model. its possible KU entered the RedZone with last minute betting but according to both insight and pregame they were under 68% and over 12k bets right before 6pm, of course insight was on the 20 minute delay so that is always a crap shoot. I think I will have to invest in a pro membership, especially if I plan on staying with this system. What were the BB, VR picks just WV, missed that one got caught in a meeting but I'll be interested to see if it comes in. That line got a bit high, hope you all take it down!!!!

[BigRags]

The problem is that games with >70% and <9500 are 11-3 as follows

now that I look at it, we could have played vcu, fm, xav, uga, char, bay, rice, and utep under the >70, <9500 rule (11-3)

yeah I think this is might be the best play of all, it kind of incorporates the fade and the play in one. the sharps are probably on it and they brought along some some squares but not the whole mob, also probably usually a tout play, just hopefully from some of the few good ones.

[Skanedogg]

Kansas was not a play. Not on tweet

[broadway6]

yeah I think this is might be the best play of all, it kind of incorporates the fade and the play in one. the sharps are probably on it and they brought along some some squares but not the whole mob, also probably usually a tout play, just hopefully from some of the few good ones.

you need to get a twitter account...

[broadway6]

Shane- i can figure out why you were on all of the games except Texas AM....care to share?

[Skanedogg]

Am, so fla and col st were my personal "special plays". Not because of BB. If you can figure it out just by looking, you are a math wizard sir.

[broadway6]

Am, so fla and col st were my personal "special plays". Not because of BB. If you can figure it out just by looking, you are a math wizard sir.

haha it actually makes me an idiot. I just looked at sportsinsights again, and i was looking at different games. Either way...2-0 so far. Good job.

[Skanedogg]

Sorry guys... I shoulda told y'all so fla and col st on the money line

[broadway6]

Sorry guys... I shoulda told y'all so fla and col st on the money line

even better. We'll all 3 teams are away/underdogs <9000 bets and <50% That's all at match that I can do.

[Skanedogg]

Nice try

but that's not it. It has nothing to do with the BB stuff

[JonesMalone]

skane, im just curious about one thing. so do u have a pro membership or the basic membership? because i found something interesting tonite. at 6:45 EST i did my last look on insight (basic membership) and it was over 70% (at this point i dont remember where in the 70s) so i faded pitt and went with wv. picked ended up winning which is great, however, on the final tally, it dropped to 68%... so on the surface at the time, it was the right pick, but putting it into the records, it would count as a loss, since below 70 would make you play pitt (although i know the whole redzone thing). i wonder how u account for this, if u do at all, or if thats a grey area in tracking this kinda thing. this is one of the problems i had when i did my tracking last year

[dogs1972]

fade those 1* and would be a hell of a night.