View New Posts
123
  1. #1

    Default Bookie Bill Big Slick 1.26.2010

    vegas-runner | CBB Sides Tue, 01/26/10 - 9:00 PM Ž”
    triple-dime bet 534 S.Carolina 7.5 (-110) Bodog vs 533 Kentucky Analysis: …*** CBB 3* BOOKIE BET *** (Confirmed "BIG SLICK BET" by Bookie Bill)
    BODOG is Using +8 !!

  2. #2

    Default

    triple-dime bet 536 Minnesota -12.0 (-110) BetUS vs 535 Northwestern Analysis: *** CBB 3* UPGRADED BEST BET OF THE DAŽY ***

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ball Picker View Post
    triple-dime bet 536 Minnesota -12.0 (-110) BetUS vs 535 Northwestern Analysis: *** CBB 3* UPGRADED BEST BET OF THE DAŽY ***
    this is a VR play right?...not a 2nd slick pick?

  4. #4

    Default

    Yes. This is a VR triple dime. I put it in the wrong thread.

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ball Picker View Post
    vegas-runner | CBB Sides Tue, 01/26/10 - 9:00 PM Ž”
    triple-dime bet 534 S.Carolina 7.5 (-110) Bodog vs 533 Kentucky Analysis: …*** CBB 3* BOOKIE BET *** (Confirmed "BIG SLICK BET" by Bookie Bill)
    BODOG is Using +8 !!
    I am fading this 100%.....Kentucky will win this game by double digits be careful guys

  6. #6

    Default

    that slick bet is stink fade 100/% im with you aguido2

  7. #7

    Default

    I'm not saying who to play, but I am on UK. It will all come down to how well UK contains (or doesn't contain) S. Carolina's stud PG.

  8. #8

    Default

    not that trends mean anything cuz they really dont...but the slick picks in cbb have been win 1, lose 2, win 1, lose 2, if the trend continues, tonight should be a win...

    tonight is also the first dog of the cbb season

    lol...maybe its just wishful thinking on my part...but good luck which ever side your on

  9. #9

    Default

    I almost want to buy off due to UK playing kind of a soft schedule. USC will be ready for them tonight but I'm going with the Wildcats.

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ball Picker View Post
    I almost want to buy off due to UK playing kind of a soft schedule. USC will be ready for them tonight but I'm going with the Wildcats.

    I hear you. This one will hurt no matter what. Either I win and lose all faith in BB's college hoops, or lose and curse myself for not trusting him supremely.

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ball Picker View Post
    I'm not saying who to play, but I am on UK. It will all come down to how well UK contains (or doesn't contain) S. Carolina's stud PG.
    PG is nasty but Kentucky is too tough and deep!!!! Can't see SC coming within 12 points....thats my opinion!!!!

    Good Luck to all!!!!!

  12. #12

    Default

    for what it's worth... i have been tracking the sides squares are betting on BB's twitter releases about who he is routing for when there is heavy action (9,500 bets or more) and uneven action (70%+) on one side according to sports insights numbers. in those cases, those BB says he needs to win (fading the squares) is 14-3.

    not only is SoCar a slick bet but UK also falls into this fade area.

  13. #13

  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skanedogg View Post
    for what it's worth... i have been tracking the sides squares are betting on BB's twitter releases about who he is routing for when there is heavy action (9,500 bets or more) and uneven action (70%+) on one side according to sports insights numbers. in those cases, those BB says he needs to win (fading the squares) is 14-3.

    not only is SoCar a slick bet but UK also falls into this fade area.



    Came out with the same criteria, and that makes BB slick play a better play

  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by birdman779 View Post
    been burned bye slick bill lately im on kentucky
    I have to agree with the BIRDMAN this dude doesnt impress me. But as always all the information is good, so thanks for the post

  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aguido2 View Post
    I have to agree with the BIRDMAN this dude doesnt impress me. But as always all the information is good, so thanks for the post



    I know what u talking about..........Football his slicks killed but cbb not so good

  17. #17

  18. #18

    Default

    Kentucky is the biggest sucker bet of the night. Last week when Kentucky went to Auburn the same thing happend. The squares bet Kentucky like the game was over and not only did Auburn cover, they almost got the straight up win. Buy the line to 8(Thats the number the sharps got) and watch and learn.

  19. #19

    Default

    Well we see how Kentucky holds up at no.1 alot of pressure with big games against ranked teams up next

  20. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KongKiller View Post
    Kentucky is the biggest sucker bet of the night. Last week when Kentucky went to Auburn the same thing happend. The squares bet Kentucky like the game was over and not only did Auburn cover, they almost got the straight up win. Buy the line to 8(Thats the number the sharps got) and watch and learn.




    Yo bro GL my man.......

  21. #21

  22. #22

  23. #23

    Default

    In line with my earlier post... Mich St (23000 bets, 73%) and Clemson (18000 bets, 73%) were also fades under this "filter."

    2-0 thus far, that's 16-3 since I started tracking on Jan 1... With Kentucky later

  24. #24

    Default

    Good call, Skane. I'd like to see where the numbers hit vs. the spread. I'm seeing a LOT of public favorites like that not covering by 2 or 3 points this year but winning the game. Hmmmm....

  25. #25

    Default

    Those numbers for me are against the spread. I have also been tracking those numbers in the 60th percentile but the fades only hit at a little more than 50%.

    The only problem is that bill tweets the sides they are heavy from squares right at tip of the 600 cst games so it is tough to make the bets (unless you can get some local action)

  26. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aguido2 View Post
    i am fading this 100%.....kentucky will win this game by double digits be careful guys
    Quote Originally Posted by watchdog View Post
    that slick bet is stink fade 100/% im with you aguido2
    really????

  27. #27
    lacesout's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 10-18-09
    Posts: 1,130
    Message Me

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Durden View Post
    really????


    They won't be back in this thread.

  28. #28

    Default

    If you don't bet the slick bets for the same amount and come in and pick and choose and babble like Malinsky then you will lose. Bet the game and go to bed, holy shit people are stupid.

  29. #29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thebestthereis View Post
    If you don't bet the slick bets for the same amount and come in and pick and choose and babble like Malinsky then you will lose. Bet the game and go to bed, holy shit people are stupid.

  30. #30

  31. #31

    Default

    I bet those rookies even took the half time bait on Kentucky...LOL

  32. #32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KongKiller View Post
    I bet those rookies even took the half time bait on Kentucky...LOL
    1/2 time line was 4 , went to 3 1/2 felt real good when i saw that, Bookie Bill said he is going to have alot more BIG SLICKS like this fading the squares, thats more like it

  33. #33

  34. #34

    Default

    I just checked the numbers... The SI information where teams did not reach 70% action (uab, Maryland, unc) were 3-0 tonight, which makes those hitting at over 60% for the same period I have been tracking bills other "teams he needs to lose.". It amazes me that those with less than 70% of the bets win while those with more than 70% always lose.

    Anyone have any thoughts on why this might be?

  35. #35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skanedogg View Post
    I just checked the numbers... The SI information where teams did not reach 70% action (uab, Maryland, unc) were 3-0 tonight, which makes those hitting at over 60% for the same period I have been tracking bills other "teams he needs to lose.". It amazes me that those with less than 70% of the bets win while those with more than 70% always lose.

    Anyone have any thoughts on why this might be?
    do u bet them?...where do u get the 70% from?

123 Last
Top