[bhunter]

Have been doing some data mining in the Scamdicappers database, mainly looking for who's good, but i've also been looking at potential FADES, and the one that sticks out the most is Malinsky.

Based on their stats going back to August he loses consistently across the board.

League Wins Losses Win Pct
Overall 106 146 42.06%
MLB 20 22 47.62%
NBA 14 27 34.15%
NFL 18 27 40%
NCAAB 18 26 40.91%
NCAAF 36 44 45%

I then broke his plays down by unit, and again he's consistently bad only having a winning % only on 3 & 6 unit plays and only just!


Units Won Lost Win Pct
1: 7 9 43.75%
3: 7 5 58.33%
4: 72 105 40.68%
5: 5 13 027.78%
6: 15 14 51.72%

Conclusion... His win % is lower than Langs and his picks are consistently bad across the board... so i'm going to be fading all his regular season picks with equal stakes.

With Lang you have to use his money management and also only fade regular season games, not playoffs or bowl games. Anyone fading all his picks would be DOWN over 300 units for January. Using my Lang strategy i'm 10-4 (71%) and UP 133 units.

The reason i only fade regular season bets is that the wider the range of games to pick from the worse a bad capper (square) is. Give them 1 or 2 games to choose from (like on a playoff weekend) and the odds are much more in their favour.

[Ball Picker]

Malinsky is part of the big time scammers out there. He is def. good fade material. I know he bets certain units on games, but he is something like 0 for 10 over his last 10 plays.

[aceking]

Of course Lang

[bhunter]

Of course Lang

Lol, well i'll give you that fading Lang is certainly more fun!

[khaden]

nice work--i like it

[Hoopman]

Good work bhunter. Thanks for sharing and good luck on the fades bro.

[lordmohs]

Where is Joey, he has made tons of money from malinsky