| Poster's Sportsbook Poll: 2011View Poll Results | ||
| # 1 5Dimes | 450 total points | 5Dimes Review |
| # 2 Pinnacle | 408 total points | Pinnacle Review |
| # 3 Heritage | 227 total points | Heritage Review |
| # 4 Bookmaker | 138 total points | Bookmaker Review |
| # 5 BetIslands | 129 total points | BetIslands Review |
| SBR Top-Rated SportsbooksRecommended List | ||
| Pinnacle Sports | SBR Rating A+ | Pinnacle Sports Review |
| 5Dimes | SBR Rating A+ | 5Dimes Review |
| BookMaker | SBR Rating A+ | BookMaker Review |
| Legends | SBR Rating A+ | Legends Review |
| Bodog | SBR Rating A | Bodog Review |
JM V1 NBA System Play
Dallas - counted as a B win: series closed
New Jersey - Optional B wager today if you choose (you could have won/pushed/lost with various spreads)
Portland - Repeat A wager (could have won/pushed/lost - start consecutive 4 game road trip today to meet system play)
Chicago - A loss: B wager today
It's ridiculous the means to which JM will ensure his system has a flawless winning record...
Are you saying he is lying?
80-1 last season season sounds incredible but..
only sure bet is chi today... if POR does not cover in the next three... he will claim it was a push on a bet...
NJ worst road team... so no play... he maybe calls it a win or push... but dont play it... cause risk is high they loose...
Here is Jm actual email message today, to anyone who cares:
I loudly declared to you last time that 1/19 would be a payday
you'll never forget - and boy, did we ever cashed in!
Not once was there ever a single ounce of any doubt in my mind that
Sacramento would pull away the win, and wow - they sure did deliver!
Dallas also reeled in an easy [B] win! The New Jersey game could've
resulted in several different results depending on the spread you
were offered. You can make an optional wager for them today if you wish.
Portland may not have covered, or pushed, depending on your spread,
but you can remake the [A] wager for them today due to the fact
that they play a consecutive 4-game road trip vs the opposing
conference, allowing you the extra opportunity to wager on them for
the final game in case you need to.
Chicago did not cover on the [A] game. We have an official Chicago
[B] wager today as they play against the LA Clippers. Our [B] bets
record so far this NBA season is a perfect 10-0!
Good luck!
-John Morrison, PhD
Take it for what its worth and gl
I wasn't sure if that counted as a write up... don't want to go against the boss.
[B]Our bets
record so far this NBA season is a perfect 10-0!
ok so I thought SAC was a C bet... so no perfect record... hell he even cant write his own emails nowadays
He considers the A-B-C system bet is a single bet so thats the reason he have this incredible record. ^^"
And where were you when he didn't add the C losses to his record?Originally Posted by Xeon
He claims his "B" record is 10-0. Even if you don't take into account the "C" loss on Houston, he just declared in the same email posted above that Sacramento "C" Bet was a win. By definition, if you made a "C" Bet, you must have lost a "B" Bet, so how can the "B" Bet record be 10-0?
Did anyone notice the NBA 3.0 he is touting...? Any ideas on what the filter is?
Oh thanks for the explanation, I was misunderstanding.
Perhaps, I think it may be a omission.
The best part about Morrison is that he heavily promotes BetUs and the lines on BetUS for the system plays are always shaded by a 1/2 point... Don't ever use BETUS for his system plays!!!
Pistons were a loss but you should have never wagered that series cause of injuries. Rockettes were a loss during Chritmas. Other than that zero losses.
The record is legit but JM claims 0 losses last year.
He always uses whatever lines make his system win for that series.
If the early morning line favored the wager he placed it then..if the late line movement went the way of the play... thats what he put it in as.
If a series losses Sac last year opening series, it shouldn't have been played even though he email;ed it because sac was the worst road team at 0-2 and his email was a personal play...Houston is now a win because when you are favored by 3+ you should wager the ML. Yet in his record breakdown post, Houston is nowhere to be found. That series has been swept under the rug like it never existed and the poll survey to everyone came back with results saying to keep the undefeated record in tact and not show the loss...yah right.
The NJ and Port series are optional because of course although some may have lost or pushed on each, JM won both..another Yah right. His email stated how he knew the Sac C wager was going to cash. even when at 1/2 time when Sac was down by 20? JM was frantically brainstorming how he was going to make some excuse for the wager to not exist like last year.
He is a BS artist and a liar.
I am wagering Chi and Port but am staying away from NJ.
Best of Luck moving forward.
Pistons were a loss for most but the B wager was claimed to be a win because of getting the favorable line. (of course)
I had the favorable line but am only able to buy 2 points so lost by .5. The C wager got crushed.
Rockets were a definite loss without the "new filter".
Does anyone know if Brandon Roy is playing tonight?
Thks buddy, I really appraise your comment.
Yes
So much for the chicago B bet.. no more "10 - 0"
Once again JM is claiming push after getting the favorable line +4.
I had +3.5 and only am able to buy 2 which resulted in a loss.
Its amazing how many times this type of situation occurs.
For the record, JM's email states replay the Chi B in their next game vs Pho.
The unblemished record remains LOL.
Best of Luck
I didn't see anywhere with the line at 4. It sat at 3.5 all day. Just part of playing this type of system.
puppet...you can only buy 2 points?...isn't the whole point of the system to buy 3 points?...if you are interested in a site where u can buy 3 points...message me thanks
I actually was able to get the +4 (so bought to +7) - normally I get the worst lines on this board but think I got lucky. I looked at another site and saw it sitting at +3.5 so I got on it right away at the +4.......I will say that I use another site that tracks line movement throughout the day and it did say that the number opened at +4 but closed at +3 - I think we all know that JM is going to do everything he can to claim wins and pushes - its his livelihood to stretch the truth in his favor - its just what it is.......
Reply With Quote