View New Posts
  1. #1

    Lightbulb hockey pick site

    just wondering if anyone has heard about ron raymond at hockeypicks.com and if he really is as good as he states.

  2. #2

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by betlarge View Post
    just wondering if anyone has heard about ron raymond at hockeypicks.com and if he really is as good as he states.
    How are you affiliated with that site and/or him?

    Why do 'newbies', betlarge joined 01.10.10, come into forums to shill like that?

  3. #3

    Default

    hey hack, first off ive been using this site for years but only recently have decided to use the forums and secondly I am not in anyway affiliated with him or his site. You prove to have the mind capacity of an infant with a ridiculous comment such as that. If someone posts a question that you have no proper response/answer for kindly continue masturbating in front of your computer screen to photos of livestock and allow me to get a real answer.

  4. #4

  5. #5

    Default

    i just bet he is , regardless if anyone can answer the original question it would be helpful

  6. #6

    Default

    Well that depends, how good does he state that he is?

  7. #7

    Default

    Here are Ron Raymond's NHL Picks for Wednesday, January 13, 2010.

    Minnesota 3 Vancouver 2 (actual, Min 5 Van 2)
    Washington 4 Florida 1 (actual, Was 5 Fla 4)
    Calgary 4 Pittsburgh 2 (actual, Cal 1 Pit 3)
    Anaheim 4 Boston 2 (actual, Ana 4 Bos 3)



    Sometimes I take a look at his picks, as he has some stats and trends listed as well, but I rarely follow, unless I was already leaning that way. Sometimes he is right on the money, and sometimes is way off, but thats like anyone. If you would like I can post his plays in here from day to day, and we can see how good he really is.

  8. #8

    Default

    In my experience, no one is as good as he really states.

  9. #9

    Default

    he's better than most
    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/21/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/31/2012


  10. #10

    Default

    If he doesn't share his record ytd, then we must be doubftul about his success..

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fjordo View Post
    Here are Ron Raymond's NHL Picks for Wednesday, January 13, 2010.

    Minnesota 3 Vancouver 2 (actual, Min 5 Van 2)
    Washington 4 Florida 1 (actual, Was 5 Fla 4)
    Calgary 4 Pittsburgh 2 (actual, Cal 1 Pit 3)
    Anaheim 4 Boston 2 (actual, Ana 4 Bos 3)

    http://www.hockeypicks.com/

    Sometimes I take a look at his picks, as he has some stats and trends listed as well, but I rarely follow, unless I was already leaning that way. Sometimes he is right on the money, and sometimes is way off, but thats like anyone. If you would like I can post his plays in here from day to day, and we can see how good he really is.

    could you do this so we can judge him on our own ty and what are your thots on him if you have been getting his picks

  12. #12

  13. #13

    Default

    Sorry, MVP, no thoughts on him, I haven't followed it enough, but I will post his picks, and keep a tally of his record as of yesterday.
    Todays picks not up yet.

    YTD: 3-1

  14. #14

    Default

    Yes, at hockeypicks you will find his predictions, but his picks can be found here:
    remove link. Can also go in and see the day after what he pick.

  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by betlarge View Post
    hey hack, first off ive been using this site for years but only recently have decided to use the forums and secondly I am not in anyway affiliated with him or his site. You prove to have the mind capacity of an infant with a ridiculous comment such as that. If someone posts a question that you have no proper response/answer for kindly continue masturbating in front of your computer screen to photos of livestock and allow me to get a real answer.
    betlarge,

    Hack that you are it is not whom I am for I could care less about how long you've lurked prior to joining. The rest of your response is that of a very insecure trouble person - also not unexpected. Please seek medical help, if you can not afford it let me know and I'll cover the costs for you.

  16. #16

    Default

    He doesn't actually have selected picks, just calculated picks. This is what I got.

    Here are the NHL picks using the ATS Calculator for Thursday, January 14, 2010.

    NY Rangers to win by 0.75 goals and the o/u to land on 5.39 (Ott 2 - NYR 0)

    Buffalo to win by 0.75 goals and the o/u to land on 5.62 (Buf 2 - Atl 1)

    Flyers to win by 1.77 goals and the o/u to land on 6.18 (Tor 4 - Phi 0)

    Carolina to win by 0.26 goals and the o/u to land on 5.93 (Det 3 - Car 1)

    Tampa Bay to win by 0.28 goals and the o/u to land on 5.70 (Fla 3 - TB 2)

    Montreal to win by 0.55 goals and the o/u to land on 5.45 (Mtl 5 - Dal 3)

    Minnesota to win by 0.33 goals and the o/u to land on 5.96 (Stl 1 - Min 0)

    Chicago to win by 1.75 goals and the o/u to land on 5.83 (Chi 3 - Clb 0)

    New Jersey to win by 1.03 goals and the o/u to land on 4.92 (Phx 4 - NJ 3)

    Pittsburgh to win by 1.53 goals and the o/u to land on 6.09 (Pit 3 - Edm 2)

    San Jose to win by 0.84 goals and the o/u to land on 5.35 (Bos 2 - SJ 1)

    LA Kings to win by 0.23 goals and the o/u to land on 5.74 (LA 4 - Ana 0)

    YTD: 8-8

  17. #17

    Default

    Here are the NHL picks using the ATS Calculator for Friday, January 15, 2010.

    Washington to win by 1.74 goals and the o/u to land on 6.42

    Nashville to win by 0.95 goals and the o/u to land on 5.96

  18. #18

    Default

    @ Todays Action, It seems that your childish antics have proven useless as other members enjoy following touts and checking that they are providing a true history on performance. So instead of attempting to secure some sort of smug satisfaction for failing to understand this websites true forum intent then i must only say that your lack of knowledge in behavioural science and lack of a doctorate in said field disqualifies you from casting any judgement on my mental state or capacity. Your first comment was asinine and immature and you will therefore be responded to in the same manner which you originally posted. I hope this will bring to a close this unfortunate conversation. You seem to be in good standing and according to your page a "heart of gold" therefore i feel you may have over reacted and will leave it to that.
    Best regards,

Top