View New Posts
123
  1. #1

    Default Lang 12/29

    Tuesday's Selections ...
    100 DIME - MIAMI-FLORIDA HURRICANES - (if line is 3 1/2 you buy the 1/2 and lay 3. You never get beat by the hook when dealing with the 3, 7, 10, 14 or 17 number.) - The 'U" is back.

    They come into this game 9-3 with their 3 losses being to Virginia Tech on the road in a downpour, at North Carolina, and at home to Clemson.

    Throw out the V-Tech game, as Miami was in the wrong place at the wrong time playing in a hurricane, no pun intended.

    Jacory Harris played perhaps the worst game of his career versus the Tarheels throwing 4 INT's, two or which were returned for toucdowns.

    As for the Clemson game, they put up close to 450 yards total offense but again couldn't overcome 4 turnovers in a heartbreaking 40-37 loss.

    Oh, and they held all world running back C.J. Spiller to less than 70 yards rushing.

    This might be the best 9-3 football team in the entire country.

    As for Wisconsin, they just can't match the overall speed of what they are going to see tonight.

    In their two games versus top 15 opponents this year they were outscored 51-23 losing to Ohio State 31-13 and Iowa 20-10.

    I won't even waste my breath talking about their loss at Northwestern, or their near loss at home to Northern Illinois, or Fresno State.

    There is a reason the Badgers have been outscored in their last 2 bowl games by a combined score of 63-30 and that reason is pretty damn simple.

    SPEED KILLS. Enough said.

    This line should be 10, and even then I would lay it as I just see the Canes shutting down the Badger run game and turning loose their secondary to pick some passes.

    Enjoy the double digit winner as the Canes deliver big for me tonight.

    100 dime winner - Miami-Florida

    FREE SELECTION - TEMPLE OWLS

  2. #2

  3. #3

    Default

    noooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!
    I liked Miami

  4. #4

    Default

    LANG RESULTS for 12/28/09

    30 DIMES - MINNESOTA VIKINGS - LOSER
    25 DIMES - TEXAS A&M - LOSER
    25 DIMES - TEXAS A&M OVER - LOSER
    25 DIMES - TEXAS A&M/OVER TEASER - LOSER

    -118.5 DIMES


    LANG 2009: 403-457-15, -1,502 Dimes


    Lang By Month:

    January: +61.5 Dimes

    February: -170 Dimes

    March: +14.5 Dimes

    April: -308.5 Dimes

    May: -13.5 Dimes

    June: -81.25 Dimes

    July: +17 Dimes

    August: +50 Dimes

    September: -312.25 Dimes

    October: -405 Dimes

    November: +98.5 Dimes

    December: -453 Dimes


    Lang For The Week: 12/22 to 12/28

    Tuesday: -22 Dimes

    Wednesday: -18 Dimes

    Thursday: +75 Dimes

    Friday: +28 Dimes

    Saturday: -82.5 Dimes

    Sunday: +40 Dimes

    Monday: -118.5 Dimes

    Final Week Total: -98 Dimes

    ________________________________________ __


    Lang College Football: 38-47-2, (-361 Dimes)
    (NON BOWL RELATED)

    $100 Wagered Per Dime -$36,100


    05 Dime Plays: 8-7-0
    10 Dime Plays: 9-13-1
    15 Dime Plays: 12-12-0
    20 Dime Plays: 5-5-0
    25 Dime Plays: 1-2-0
    30 Dime Plays: 1-4-0
    40 Dime Plays: 0-4-0
    50 Dime Plays: 1-1-1


    ________________________________________ __


    Lang Bowl Season: 5-6-0, (-147 Dimes)

    $100 Wagered Per Dime -$14,700


    05 Dime Plays: 0-0-0
    10 Dime Plays: 1-0-0
    15 Dime Plays: 1-0-0
    20 Dime Plays: 0-1-0
    25 Dime Plays: 3-3-0
    50 Dime Plays: 0-1-0
    75 Dime Plays: 0-1-0


    ________________________________________ __


    Lang NFL: 35-39-2, (-258 Dimes)

    $100 Wagered Per Dime -$25,800


    05 Dime Plays: 3-1-0
    10 Dime Plays: 9-13-1
    15 Dime Plays: 8-4-1
    20 Dime Plays: 5-4-0
    25 Dime Plays: 1-3-0
    30 Dime Plays: 2-8-0
    40 Dime Plays: 2-3-0
    50 Dime Plays: 4-2-0
    75 Dime Plays: 1-0-0

    100 Dime Plays: 0-1-0


    ________________________________________ __


    Lang NBA: 10-14-1, (-78.5 Dimes)

    $100 Wagered Per Dime -$7,850


    05 Dime Plays: 7-5-1
    10 Dime Plays: 2-7-0
    15 Dime Plays: 1-1-0
    20 Dime Plays: 0-0-0
    25 Dime Plays: 0-1-0


    ________________________________________ __


    Lang College Basketball: 5-13-0, (-109 Dimes)

    $100 Wagered Per Dime -$10,900


    05 Dime Plays: 2-2-0
    10 Dime Plays: 2-7-0
    15 Dime Plays: 1-4-0
    20 Dime Plays: 0-0-0
    25 Dime Plays: 0-0-0


    ________________________________________ __


    Lang MLB '09 Playoffs: 4-13, (-112.5 Dimes)

    $100 Wagered Per Dime -$11,250


    05 Dime Plays: 1-5
    10 Dime Plays: 2-3
    15 Dime Plays: 1-2
    20 Dime Plays: 0-1
    25 Dime Plays: 0-2




    LONG LIVE THE FADE



    Lang FADE NBA Basketball: 14-10-1, (+58 Dimes)

    $100 Wagered Per Dime +$5,800


    ------------------------------------------------

    Lang FADE NCAA Basketball: 13-5-0, (+90.5 Dimes)

    $100 Wagered Per Dime +$9,050


    ------------------------------------------------

    Lang FADE College Football: 46-37-2, (+228 Dimes)
    (NON BOWL RELATED)

    $100 Wagered Per Dime +$22,800


    ------------------------------------------------

    Lang FADE Bowl Season: 6-4-0, (+137.5 Dimes)

    $100 Wagered Per Dime +$13,750


    ------------------------------------------------

    Lang FADE NFL: 37-32-3, (+179.5 Dimes)

    $100 Wagered Per Dime +$17,950


    ------------------------------------------------

    Lang's Teaser Plays Are Not Included In The Fade

    ________________________________________ __

  5. #5

    Default

    He is the Liberace of Handicapping:

    when asked about the merciless beatdown he got from critics, he remarked "I laughed all the way to the bank."

    so we can fade all we want, which i am fine with cause he makes me $$$$$$$$

    but bashing him? you are wasting time and energy. the guy is PAID and could care less about us.

    having said that:

    Long Live the Fade

  6. #6

  7. #7

    Default

    Nice, already was betting Wisconsin. Maybe I should double up?

  8. #8

  9. #9

    Default

    He is trying his hardest to be able to say on January 1 that he ended the year the final days of 2009 up 100+ units and well on his way to his 18th straight super bowl. Chasing for marketing purposes. Just keep fading

  10. #10

    Default

    HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA I can't touch that game now....unless I get the Back 2 The Future Sports Almanac.

  11. #11

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by broadway6 View Post
    HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA I can't touch that game now....unless I get the Back 2 The Future Sports Almanac.
    Fading Lang is the next best thing.

  13. #13

    Default

    He makes an average of $80,000 on a Sunday alone. He has over 4,000 loyal customers. So sick!!

  14. #14

    Default

    I'm new to this site. Does anyone have the stats for Anthony Redd and Craig Davis.

  15. #15

    Default

    Brandon Lang has a direct line to God. I am almost positive Lang put his own personal wager on Wisconsin.

  16. #16

    Default

    Fuk head lane going to jinx me !!!!!!!!!!

  17. #17

  18. #18

  19. #19

    Default

    Dr. Bob's analysis of this game

    It's certainly a good argument that Wisconsin doesn't have the speed to play with Miami in this game but not many teams can match the Hurricanes' athleticism and that advantage is mostly likely in the statistics already. After all, Wisconsin never has the athletes that the teams from the South have and the Badgers have gone 3-2 ATS in their last 5 bowl games against Southern schools. I'm not completely dismissing the speed advantage for Miami, but I think it's overblown. Miami's team speed helped the Hurricanes out-gain opponents 6.1 yards per play to 5.2 yppl this season, but speed has nothing to do with quarterback Jacory Harris throwing 17 interceptions.

    Miami's biggest advantage in this game is their run defense, which held opponents 4.3 yards per rushing play, which is very good considering that the Hurricanes' opponents would average 5.0 yprp against an average team. Stopping Wisconsin's John Clay (1396 yards at 5.3 ypr) from running at his normal rate could be the key to defending the Badgers. Wisconsin quarterback Scott Tolzien had good numbers this season (7.1 yards per pass play against teams that would allow 5.9 yppp to an average quarterback), but he struggled against good defensive teams that could stop the run - averaging just 4.2 yppp against Ohio State and Iowa defenses that would allow 4.4 yppp to an average quarterback. Miami's pass defense (0.3 yppp better than average) isn't nearly as good as the pass defenses of Iowa and Ohio State, so Tolzien struggling against the Buckeyes and Hawkeyes after they shut down the run is not a strong indication that Tolzien will struggle in this game if Clay is slowed down by the good Hurricanes' run defense. Overall, Wisconsin is 0.4 yards per play better than average offensively and Miami is 0.5 yppl better than average, so that match-up is pretty even if Tolzien plays at his normal level.

    Miami's offense has a more decisive advantage over the Badgers' defense, as the Hurricanes move the ball 1.0 yppl better than an average Division 1A team (6.1 yppl against teams that would allow 5.1 yppl) with a better than average rushing attack (5.0 yprp against teams that would allow 4.7 yprp) and Harris' big play passing. Harris started the season averaging 10.8 yards per pass play in each of the first two games against Florida State and Georgia Tech, but he ended the regular season at 7.1 yppp while facing a schedule of teams that would allow 5.4 yppp to an average quarterback. Wisconsin is very good defending the run (3.8 yprp allowed to teams that would average 4.7 yprp against an average stop unit), but the Badgers have struggled some in the secondary and are just 0.1 yppp better than average (6.1 yppp allowed to quarterbacks that would average 6.2 yppp against an average team). Harris should have very good success throwing the ball, but he's had problems with interceptions in his first year and a half as a starter (24 picks on 571 pass attempts, 4.2%) and the Badgers were better than average intercepting passes this season (4.0% picks against 1A teams, where 3.5% is average). It has been reported that Harris' injured thumb is still bothering him, but I'll assume he's 100%.

    I have a feeling that turnovers will be the key in this game (as is the case with most games), as Miami is clearly a better team from the line of scrimmage (my math model predicts 6.3 yppl for Miami and 5.5 yppl for Wisconsin). Overall, the math model favors Miami by just 3 points, so the line is about right, but Wisconsin applies to a 52-14-1 ATS bowl situation while Miami applies to a negative 21-52 ATS bowl situation. I'll lean with Wisconsin plus the points and I'll lean Under 57 points or more.

  20. #20

    Default

    Great day for Lang yesterday. I should have also faded that total and teaser. Should have known better from all that cockiness.

  21. #21

  22. #22

    Default

    Ha ha...Last night I said was going to chase with a huge play very soon.... fool is so predictable. You can't get any sooner than this. It looks like Wisky wins this one straight up.

  23. #23

    Default

    i love this! long live the FADE!
    also, 0-1 on his 100 dime plays so far?

  24. #24
    20Four7's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-08-07
    Posts: 6,497
    SBR Points: 2082
    Message Me

    Default

    I had a small lean to Miami...... Now I"m happily fading away.

  25. #25

    Default

    Huge Canes fan here.....this is bad....very very bad.

  26. #26

    Default

    This guy gone mad! Haven't seen a play this huge from the langster.

  27. #27
    yisman's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 09-01-08
    Posts: 42,184
    SBR Points: 521
    Message Me

    Default

    If you have a strong opinion on a game and Lang is on it as well, sometimes maybe you can stick with the pick, but drop your bet amount.

    Tonight is different. As far as I am concerned, you can throw all the other touts out the window on this one.

    If you're picking a side on the night bowl game, you either have to fade Lang or stay away.

    Classic Lang money management.


    I've noticed lately that after his big losing days, there's no NOTE discussing the previous day's results.
    150pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY7th Place 5/29/2012

    663pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 5/20/2012

    5,880

    SBR POKER TOP 100

    96th Place 11/1/2011

    iPad
    WINNER
    SBR Casino 10/31/2011

    400pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY1st Place 5/30/2012


  28. #28
    yisman's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 09-01-08
    Posts: 42,184
    SBR Points: 521
    Message Me

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by frostno98 View Post
    This guy gone mad! Haven't seen a play this huge from the langster.
    He's done it before. He loves to chase his bad bets with bigger bad bets.

    75 dimers, 100 dimers...
    150pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY7th Place 5/29/2012

    663pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 5/20/2012

    5,880

    SBR POKER TOP 100

    96th Place 11/1/2011

    iPad
    WINNER
    SBR Casino 10/31/2011

    400pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY1st Place 5/30/2012


  29. #29

    Default

    I said last night Chicago ML (that of course was lucky LOL) Loving Wisc!!!!

  30. #30

  31. #31

    Default

    Anyone feel for Lang's wife? constant yelling and fits with the occasional beatdown

  32. #32

  33. #33

    Default

    the video will have technical difficulties tommorrow....always does after big loss......cant wait to fade him on new years day

  34. #34

    Default

    Do ppl really buy this guy's PICKS? I do not know how anyone can get their ASS kicked following his picks and pay for MORE?

    IF YOU GET YOUR ASS KICKED BY A "DONKEY" YOU CAN NOT BE STUPID ENOUGH TO BEND OVER FOR MORE!!!

    Buy his picks and lose once.."didn't know"
    Buy his picks twice and lose.."Had to see about his next bets"
    Buy his picks AND lose 3rd..forth...5th....INFINITY!..."You are a DUM..ASS!!"

    How does this guy make any money?

    WTF

    WTF

  35. #35

    Default

    You buy his picks to fade him. He even wonders how he still has customers

123 Last
Top