[bmhiggins]

Looking for advise on which of these guys to follow. I know both systems are similar in that they use A, B, and C bets. I believe Sports Betting Professor may give out picks for more sports. I know that Morrisson has been back-tested many times in this forum and his record is pretty incredible. Has anyone back-tested Sports Betting Proffessor? Any advise would be appreciated. Thanks!

[JaymzPhoenix]

JM's system is good but the juice is massive, having to go down to -190 in some games is far greater risk. On the weekend the NBA v1 lost its first series in 3 years, would of put a massive dent in most followers pockets.

As for the Betting Professor his odds stay around -110 to -120, but the A B C bet could all be in the same day. I think there are some links to his strategies on here somewhere. Have not back tested this but have been following NBA all season and am up about 7 -10 units.

Hope this helps.

[bmhiggins]

Thanks for the info, hopefully someone can confirm his overall record so far this year.

[palmyjin]

aren't they using the same system?

[keel44]

Sports professor uses key point spread lines to make his wagers. You can play him straight or follow an A, B, C strategy. He is incredible. Not as incredible as the run Morrison can put out. Why not play both? You should have strict money management before you do anything. If you want more info, please PM me.

[frasol]

Hi,

I want to know your strict money management. I have run morrison and sportsbettingprofessor. How do you bet with Richs system?

I live in europe so sometimes it could be a little late to bet on the different games the same day with different times.

[tgrbb]

Are The Sports betting professors strategies available anywhere on this forum?

[mav924]

Morrison lies. He sent an email asking how to count the series loss on Houston:

A) Mark the current record as 26-1. Record the Houston series as a
loss even though it should be a win based on the current rules of
the system (This reflects our betting performance so far this
season, but also will create a great deal of confusions to new
system users who will undoubtedly question why the Houston series
was recorded as a loss)

B) Mark the current record as 27-0. Record the Houston series as a
win based on the -3 Favorites or greater rule (This does not truly
reflect our betting performance so far, but it genuinely reflects
the results of the system with the current rules, and eliminate any
confusions going forward).

C) Mark the current record as 26-0. Completely discard the Houston
series as neither a win or a loss. Basically, a "best of both worlds"
option where the record more genuinely reflects our betting
performance and at the same time does not create any confusion
going forward.

Instead of being honest and picking A, he chose C and erased it completely from the record. He tells others not to datamine but yet tries to excuse the series loss by saying it should be a win had the new rule been in place but the new rule was made cuz of the loss. He also doesn't post odds at which he gets the games but waits and checks which was the highest odds for the game. Which means i had 2 other series loss with odds that were the average for the day. Once again dishonest. I have used another service called sportsbettingprofessor which when emails are sent out, he states exactly which odds he uses for his record. If you get better odds but he loses then he counts it as a loss as any honest person would

[bustabook]

This isn't the first time i've seen Morrison make up a new rule and completely erase a loss, acting like it never happened. This wouldn't be such a big deal if his losses didn't cost so many units.

Stay away from morrison, he is a cheat. Anyone can put together a model that goes 27-0 when they can erase losses.

Stay away.

[schenker88]

Hi,

John Morrison is a lier, scammer!!!

He does not gives exact spread lines only says: A, B or C bet. Then he takes the best available lines of the day + buys 3 points of course. When everybody loses or pushes for instance bet [B] he says: this game is closed with a win because the best spread of the day +3 points covered this by 0,5 point (best line +8,5 points and the team lost the game with 8 points). You can make an optional wager... OPTIONAL WAGER for bet C? But everybody knows its impossible to bet always on the best lines because they are always changing. He also lied about his past records...

My advise: STAY AWAY.

I think SB Professor is much better he always gives out exact spread lines.

[bustabook]

schenker.. where are you from?

[schenker88]

from hungary
why?

[bustabook]

ok... i knew a fellow gambler in college whos last name was schenk.. just making sure the world isn't shrinking.

[tgunn11]

I've been playing SB Professor for about a year now and very happy with the results, although he's been struggling in college basketball this season and lost his first series yesterday to run his record to 5-1.

[crazymonkey]

anyone know what the system is? thanks

[bmhiggins]

5-1 doesn't seem to shabby! From everything I've been reading it seems that both Morrisson and Sports Betting Professor have winning systems but Morrisson just isn't an honest guy and lies about losses. I plan to get on board with the Sports Betting Professor soon and use strict money management, maybe 1-3% of bankroll per bet. Since his premium package is $197 for all picks for life it allows most people with limited bankrolls to use strict money management since they don't need to worry about making up the cost of the system before the season ends. I also heard from other posters that Morrison has sold his systems with "picks for life" only to release a newer version of the same system and require people to pay for it if they want to continue to receive picks. I have heard only positive things about how the Sports Betting Professor conducts business.

[bustabook]

5-1 doesn't seem to shabby!...

bmh... 5-1 is terrible when you convert it to units.

so for the 5 wins you win 1 unit each...

for the 1 loss you lose a huge amount of units.. the "record" is very misleading.

[bmhiggins]

I see what you mean. So he won 5 units, but the 1 loss represents a lost "a,b,c" series which equates to losing 1 unit on the "a" bet, two units on the "b" bet, and 4 units on the "c" bet for a total loss of 7 units. So overall he is -2 units for college basketball. I'll have to keep this in mind in the future that to make up for every lost series you need to win 7 units.

Almost makes you wonder if you would be better off only going as far as the "b" bet? That way you could avoid the possiblity of losing 4 units on the "c" bet.

I will probably follow his system as he outlines it once I purchase it but it's interesting to think about.

[bustabook]

bmh... it is much worse than that!

you lose 1.7 units on the [A] bet, since you bought 3 points on it..

you lost 4.6 units on the [B] bet, since you bought 3 points and are trying to make back what you lost on the [A] bet + 1 unit..

and you lost 12.4 units on the [C] bet, since you bought 3 points and are trying to make back what you lost on the [A] + [B] bets + 1 unit!

so if my math is right, you actually lost 18.7 units "chasing" 1 unit!

if the system is "5-1", you are actually down 13.7 units, not 2.

Also, who knows if the system is really 5-1, he has been known to lose a series bet and then make up some clowny new rule and "erase" that loss. Just look at the beginning of this thread.

Stay away, bmh... stay away.

[bmhiggins]

Wait I didn't think you had to buy points under Sports Betting Professor's system. I'm pretty sure his system is against the spread straight up. I know what you said is true of Morrisson's system so you are right that if you were using his system that it would be much worse than I said. I also have heard that Morrisson is known for lying about his record but haven't heard this about the Professor. Anyone have any insight on this?

[whatsgood5]

Short answer, NEITHER

[bustabook]

i thought you meant that the morrison system was 5-1...

as for the professors system, i dont really know anything about it.

if you want to check something interesting out, check out scott's system in the NBA Handicapping Section.. it is a chase-based system with less risk that has a good concept/theory and has been doing very well so far this season... its also free.

GL

[JaymzPhoenix]

You don't have to buy point for the Betting Professor. Maybe worst case scenario buy half to 1 point but its not as bad as Morrison. With SBP it doesn't take long (maybe 2 -3) series to recover the loss where as Morrison can take years.

[rkelly110]

Sports betting professor buying trick, when you click on the link to buy, exit out, the next
page will have the system for $100 off. @ $97. You can also try his picks for 30 days for $5.

Last year I tried the $5 for 30 days and I was still getting picks 90 days later, until I bought
his package. So, he's not on the ball as far as checking his members accounts. You could
probably get his picks all year for one low price of $5.

I wouldn't buy his NCAAB package, strict system bets are 3 for 11. Baseball last year sucked
also.

NCAAF, NFL, & NBA picks are excellent.

[schenker88]

Sports betting professor buying trick, when you click on the link to buy, exit out, the next
page will have the system for $100 off. @ $97. You can also try his picks for 30 days for $5.

Last year I tried the $5 for 30 days and I was still getting picks 90 days later, until I bought
his package. So, he's not on the ball as far as checking his members accounts. You could
probably get his picks all year for one low price of $5.

I wouldn't buy his NCAAB package, strict system bets are 3 for 11. Baseball last year sucked
also.

NCAAF, NFL, & NBA picks are excellent.

in sports betting there are always ups and downs. it is a brand new system and has only just begun but was also back tested. we cannot judge it after a week run...

[rkelly110]

88, my last 3 days w/ JM & Rich, my bank has been blown in half. Today, I will probably
be wiped out w/ JM's C, B, & A bets not including Rich's picks.

[DeluxeLiner]

this thread is a disaster...

[schenker88]

i do not recommend JM. he is lieing too much and advertising his every product as the top no.1 system he has ever made... he is trying to mislead everyone!

[og4667]

your better off playing just b and c bets straight on sports betting professor. Your actually probably better off playing just C bets. C bets come up often but rarely loose even when you expect them to

[mav924]

Let's see how the liar (JM) is going to find a way out of what looks like a possible series loss on sacramento as they are down by 19 at half and at the most the best line was +7 which would be +10 once buying the 3 points which of course i am sure JM got the best line +7 when it first came out

[stickbit]

someone mentioned SBP's baseball sucks but SBP emailed me and said his baseball was +27 units last season...??? wtf??