[scottel]

Wow, what an amazing way to end an incredible streak of undefeated
seasons. who would have thought...but as they say, all good things
must come to an end. We've been absolutely on fire over the last 3
years of sports with an unprecedented winning streak of 221
straight winners and not one single loss! Tonight's game on Houston
has marked only the very first time when we're not able to cover in
almost 6 entire seasons of sports!

Coming into the game, Houston is one of those rare cases where a
betting series continues even though our team has won its previous
games. According to my extensive research, continuing a betting series
even though the team you're betting on has won any of the games
straight up will vastly increase the risk of your bet. Since Houston
won the game yesterday straight up (even though they did not cover the
spread), their chances of covering the [C] wager decreases dramatically.

Going forward, it is advisable to wager on the money line if the
team you're betting on is a favorite of more than 3 points. This
way, we will never again encounter a situation where we will have
to continue a betting series even though the team we're betting on
has won a game during the series, and we'll never again encounter
such a loss as in what we've experienced today with Houston.

Wagering on the Money Line would have reeled in the win for this
Houston series on the [B] wager. However, going strictly by the
point spread we'd mark this one down as a loss. Surely it's nice to
go on such a gargantuan undefeated winning streak as we have been,
but losing is not a matter of "if" but a matter of "when" - It is a
mathematical certainty that we can't go on winning forever. Tonight
Houston has surely been a slight bump in the road, but had you been
wagering with the NBA system since the beginning of the season,
you'll still be waaayyyy ahead by a massive amount of heart-pounding
profits at this point! Many more incredible betting opportunies are
waiting ahead, and like me, I'm sure you too can't wait to cash in
on the rest of this season together!

now he wants u to play on ML in certain situation.....admits the C loss but now says it could hav ebeen avoide

[scottel]

a 4+ fav on ML gets juicy

[ijenpo]

Is that really true? This is JM's first loss on a C bet? in the last 3 years?

[Ball Picker]

This guy is the BIGGEST scam in sports betting! And it's not even close!! F*ck this Morrison. He is just an idiot and he lies all of the time.

[stickbit]

moneyline on a 8-9 point fav? sure...fantasyland bullshit.

[Stanley77]

I'm surprised that he called the Rockets series a loss, unlike last year in which he denied the loss on the Kings series. He always uses the best lines in order to avoid a loss. The best line for the Rockets in yesterday's game was -7.5 according to Vegas Insider. So it would be at -4.5 according to Vegas Insider.

And now he's changing the system to bet on the money line if the team is favored by 3 points or more. WHAT A JOKE! I can't blame him, even though I hate him. The sportsbooks are already aware of these systems and they're fixing these games since the majority of the betting public is using these systems to bet on games.

Sports betting games are FIXED. Think about it. How do the sportsbooks figure out that the point spread lines and over/under lines so specifically? When you find out the results of these games, most of them fall within either the point spread range and/or the over/under range. That's why gambling is ALWAYS in the house's favor.

[Stanley77]

Is that really true? This is JM's first loss on a C bet? in the last 3 years?

He lost out on the C bet on the Sacramento Kings last year, but he denied it by claiming that they were the worst road team in the NBA, which is not true because they started out with a 0-1 road record before he told us to bet on them.

[scottel]

he pulled it in baseball too.......think it was det lost all 3 bets but he came back and said if u played on alt RL when det was -105 u would have won on B bet....never mentioned it before

[Ball Picker]

Stanley, they use a system to set lines for the most part these days. I have used a computer system for the last 10 years that is the type Vegas basically uses to set lines for the last few years, as my system is within a point or two (if not dead on) on lines and Over/Unders. They don't consult with teams and then set the lines to fix the games. C'mon, man.

[SaffaCappa]

I am just amazed that he has stated it was a loss, what a chop!

[GoldenAss]

he pulled it in baseball too.......think it was det lost all 3 bets but he came back and said if u played on alt RL when det was -105 u would have won on B bet....never mentioned it before

You had to put a ' on that game. I remember Tigers looking good until... Youkillis stormed the mound and attacked Porcello. haha

[ericc]

if you check most books, the money line on a 3 to 4 point favorite is usually less than buying points down to pick (even)

[atlplayer]

The email states that if the line is more than 3 or 4 points you should look at the moneyline, not if it is around 3 or 4. Last night the moneyline for cleveland at about an 8 point favorite was -450 at most books. That seems to be an absurd strategy to playing the system. I would highly recommend against that strategy as you will get crushed on the games that done lose. Right now you are laying odds of 170 and increasing that to 400-500 is counterproductive. If you were playing to win $100 you would be laying odds of $400-$500 on the "A" bet. That makes no sense. if you are playing a solid team and they happen to lose the "A" bet, your "B" bet could be just as bad if they were -250 or -300. If you lost $400 on the "A" bet you would be laying $1200-$1400 on the "B" bet to win your $500. If you can't handle the losses the way the system is meant to be played, you shouldn't be playing it.

[zbones99]

Stanly your a complete idiot. Don't gamble ever again if you honestly believe what you said is true. Your an embaressment to mankind go find a building.

[tsip]

that email is the biggest joke EVER. In MLB 08 he had 7 losses....and no not 7 games I mean 7 C bet losses. I have every email. For you newbies....this guy is a scumbag lying piece of crap. DON'T believe any of his BS. Every system he sells he ripped from people who did the work. The systems work but you don't need to buy points or chase to make money

[ratnerjl]

Anyone have a link to read about this system?

[lancerlotz]

He had 7 c bet losses using the Filters?
I don't remember see that.

[Jim87675]

At least he admitted it this year - I think it actually makes him "seem" more viable to new people. He can say he has only lost 1 series in XX years - which is actually much more believable than he has found a series that never lost.......is Philly a play or did they call that a cover the other night??

[scottel]

he was advising if u bet Htn on ML in B bet vs Nj , since htn was more than 4 pt fav u would have won...but Htn was -9 fav..that would have been some serious odds on ML

think his filtered bases had one loss but all bases plays had several C bet losses

[Smurfer1]

Well said TSIP. You are 100 percent correct!

[puppetm716]

Stanly your a complete idiot. Don't gamble ever again if you honestly believe what you said is true. Your an embaressment to mankind go find a building.

'''

[johncrud]

a little surprised? a little pissed off?

well, that is how Vietnamese conduct business.. shady as shit.