View New Posts
12
  1. #1

    Default Lang 12/21

    30 DIME - NEW YORK GIANTS - (if 3 1/2 you buy the 1/2, and lay 3. Never get beat by the hook) - Don't trust Jason Campbell on the big stage.

    As good as the Redskins have been, as good as they have played, I have sat back and watched this guy give games away.

    I am aware of how good Washington has been playing, covering 5 in a row and against the likes of the Broncos, Cowboys, Eagles, Saints and Raiders.

    If you look closer at those 5 games they could have very easily won all 5 of those SU but fact of the matter is they didn't.

    Campbell has looked really good lately, but I have trusted him way too many times in exact situations like this only to have him implode.

    As for the Giants, they came off the big win over Dallas to a loss at home to Philly, a game they came back from 14-0 down to take a 31-30 lead only to lose 45-38.

    They got the big plays to beat Dallas, but gave up the big play to lose to Philly. What favors New York here is the fact the Redskins are not a big play offense.

    Also, when it comes to the NFC East you have always had a weird dynamic involving Dallas, Philly, Giants and Redskins.

    Washington plays the Eagles and Cowboys tough, but struggle against the Giants. While the Giants always battle hard versus Philly and Dallas, but have their way with Washington.

    No matter how badly this Giants team has been lately the numbers strongly support New York being the play here.

    They've won 6 of their last 7 games versus the Redskins going 5-1-1 ATS.

    Not only has the Giants won 3 in a row SU at Fed Ex Field, but has covered 5 of their last 7 trips here.

    Lastly, the road team is 4-1-1 ATS last 6 in this series and the favorite is 7-2-1 ATS last 10.

    I will ride the Giants to continue their dominance over this Redskins team.

    15 DIME - PHOENIX SUNS - Revenge will be sweet tonight for the Suns.

    In the first meeting you can thank the NBA schedule maker for serving up the Suns on a silver platter for the Cavs to just blow them out, which they did 107-90 jumping out to a 58-39 halftime lead.

    Starting on November 3rd, the Suns played 12 of their 16 games on the road including 2 East coast road trips, and guess who the last team on the tough run was, yup Cleveland.

    From the 3rd through the 9th the Suns played at Miami, Orlando, Boston, Washington and Philly. That is 5 games in 7 nights on the road.

    They returned back to the land of the Sun for a home game against the Hornets only to go to Los Angeles to take on the Lakers on back-to-back nights.

    They got Toronto at home before 2 more on the road at Houston and New Orleans before back home for a pair with Detroit and Memphis.

    Next thing you know back to the East coast for 4 more games at Minnesota, Toronto, New York and Cleveland.

    So if it wasn't hard enough rolling into Cleveland playing on back-to-back nights having battled the Knicks the night before, it was also the 4th game in 6 nights.

    And as I pointed out, their 12th road game in 16 games played over 32 days.

    I don't care who you are, a schedule like that and jet lag would lead to any blowout.

    Now back home well rested playing only their 4th game in the last 9 days and catching the Cavs on back to back nights having played in Dallas last night, I will jump all over this Suns team at home in this spot here.

    With the line being so low and the Suns a perfect 10-0 at home this year covering 7 of those.

    A win is most likely going to be a cover and I will gladly jump on Phoenix in a great revenge spot here and a perfect back-to-back spot to get the win over this Cavs bunch.

    The only team to roll into Phoenix on the 2nd of back to back games was the Pistons and the up tempo Suns destroyed them 117-91.

    I can't see a destruction like that but I do see the Suns taking care of business and getting the win.

    FREE SELECTION - CAL SANTA BARBARA GAUCHOS

  2. #2

    Default

    LANG RESULTS for 12/20/09

    40 DIMES - SAN DIEGO CHARGERS - LOSER
    20 DIMES - GREEN BAY PACKERS - WINNER
    10 DIMES - CLEVELAND BROWNS - WINNER

    -14 DIMES


    LANG 2009: 394-446-15, -1,417.5 Dimes


    Lang By Month:

    January: +61.5 Dimes

    February: -170 Dimes

    March: +14.5 Dimes

    April: -308.5 Dimes

    May: -13.5 Dimes

    June: -81.25 Dimes

    July: +17 Dimes

    August: +50 Dimes

    September: -312.25 Dimes

    October: -405 Dimes

    November: +98.5 Dimes

    December: -368.5 Dimes


    Lang For The Week: 12/15 to 12/21

    Tuesday: -11 Dimes

    Wednesday: -11 Dimes

    Thursday: -30 Dimes

    Friday: -12 Dimes

    Saturday: -49 Dimes

    Sunday: -14 Dimes

    Monday:

    Week Total: -127 Dimes

    ________________________________________ __


    Lang College Football: 39-47-2, (-351 Dimes)

    $100 Wagered Per Dime -$35,100


    05 Dime Plays: 8-7-0
    10 Dime Plays: 10-13-1
    15 Dime Plays: 12-12-0
    20 Dime Plays: 6-4-0
    25 Dime Plays: 1-2-0
    30 Dime Plays: 1-4-0
    40 Dime Plays: 0-4-0
    50 Dime Plays: 1-1-1


    ________________________________________ __


    Lang NFL: 31-38-2, (-402 Dimes)

    $100 Wagered Per Dime -$40,200


    05 Dime Plays: 3-1-0
    10 Dime Plays: 9-13-1
    15 Dime Plays: 8-4-1
    20 Dime Plays: 5-4-0
    25 Dime Plays: 1-3-0
    30 Dime Plays: 1-7-0
    40 Dime Plays: 2-3-0
    50 Dime Plays: 1-2-0
    75 Dime Plays: 1-0-0

    100 Dime Plays: 0-1-0


    ________________________________________ __


    Lang NBA: 10-11-1, (-40 Dimes)

    $100 Wagered Per Dime -$4,000


    05 Dime Plays: 7-5-1
    10 Dime Plays: 2-5-0
    15 Dime Plays: 1-0-0
    20 Dime Plays: 0-0-0
    25 Dime Plays: 0-1-0


    ________________________________________ __


    Lang College Basketball: 5-11-0, (-76 Dimes)

    $100 Wagered Per Dime -$7,600


    05 Dime Plays: 2-2-0
    10 Dime Plays: 2-7-0
    15 Dime Plays: 1-2-0
    20 Dime Plays: 0-0-0
    25 Dime Plays: 0-0-0


    ________________________________________ __


    Lang MLB '09 Playoffs: 4-13, (-112.5 Dimes)

    $100 Wagered Per Dime -$11,250


    05 Dime Plays: 1-5
    10 Dime Plays: 2-3
    15 Dime Plays: 1-2
    20 Dime Plays: 0-1
    25 Dime Plays: 0-2




    LONG LIVE THE FADE



    Lang FADE NBA Basketball: 11-10-1, (+23 Dimes)

    $100 Wagered Per Dime +$2,300


    ------------------------------------------------

    Lang FADE NCAA Basketball: 11-5-0, (+60.5 Dimes)

    $100 Wagered Per Dime +$6,050


    ------------------------------------------------

    Lang FADE College Football: 46-38-2, (+217 Dimes)

    $100 Wagered Per Dime +$21,700


    ------------------------------------------------

    Lang FADE NFL: 35-29-2, (+242.5 Dimes)

    $100 Wagered Per Dime +$24,250


    ------------------------------------------------

    Lang's Teaser Plays Are Not Included In The Fade

  3. #3

    Default

    SHIT looks like I'm with Lang on this one...Giants -1

  4. #4

    Default

    Happy Holidays to all Lang Faders! I think if we work hard (meaning, blindly fading the langer without trying to cherry pick his plays) we can BEAT the historic October of this year.

    LANG 2009: 394-446-15, -1,417.5 Dimes

    I think an even 1,500 dimes would be nice

    If you already like the Giants or Suns tonight.. I don't want to hear about it in this thread...This thread is about joy of fading the worst handicapper (or best??) in the world.

  5. #5

  6. #6

    Default

    I knew he would be on the jints.... only problem is that i have them as the only play left on a 5 team parlay, damn it (NYG -1).... definitely going to play the other way and just bet half the ticket now..... This guy is bad enough to make a living on

  7. #7

    Default

    do you consider all the time he wants you to buy points and how much extra you would lose?

  8. #8

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by av3206 View Post
    do you consider all the time he wants you to buy points and how much extra you would lose?
    Yes, the dime count includes the extra juice ... These records are kept by a legendary fader on another board. They are not perfect because the ole' langer never posts a line (like all the scam artists on his site), but are very very close.

    I have multiple books I play from. Find the best line and never buy the hook.

  10. #10

    Default

    Well I'm hoping Lang gets one right tonight.....even a broken clock is right twice a day....

  11. #11

    Default

    dammm lang is on the gmen and on the suns.. disaster night coming..

  12. #12

    Default

    SHIT - I'm on the Suns too....didn't see his second pick....I could be in for a severe "Langing" tonight....

  13. #13

  14. #14

    Default

    I'm on the giants, oh man... I'm screwed.

  15. #15

    Default

    Fade Fade Fade away, Lang is a proven loser, his record speaks for itself. Anyone thinking lang is due for some wins just does not understand the Prime Directive---Fade all and every play langs stamps with a dime rating.

  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spippen View Post
    Fade Fade Fade away, Lang is a proven loser, his record speaks for itself. Anyone thinking lang is due for some wins just does not understand the Prime Directive---Fade all and every play langs stamps with a dime rating.
    I understand Lang is a long term loser but I'm not backing off my plays just because Lang is on them. Lang actually has some good points on both these picks tonight. Yes fading Land long term has been proven sound but cherry picking anybody is not - like I said earlier - anyone can get lucky - that is why I'll stand by my 2 picks here. Even a blind squirrel like Lang finds a nut once in a while

  17. #17

    Default

    ^^ Every single day, someone like you says the same old Bullshit, Lang's due for a win, lang has some good points, Lang looks like he's going to have a good night

    Day after day the guy is a looser, he is the ultimate jinx

  18. #18

    Default

    Lang is clueless!!! He never has any good points. Lang is John Q Public. He losses big time every year. Long live the fade.

  19. #19

  20. #20

  21. #21
    azn624's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 06-29-09
    Posts: 2,707
    SBR Points: 175
    Message Me

    Default

    Was already on WAS, like that he's on NYG

    CHARITY DONOR
    12/13/2011 $25 donation

    iPad
    WINNER
    SBR Store 10/12/2011


  22. #22

  23. #23

    Default

    ^^

    Unless I'm missing some sarcasm ...

    The SAN DIEGO SUPER CHARGERS did not cover

  24. #24
    azn624's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 06-29-09
    Posts: 2,707
    SBR Points: 175
    Message Me

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ocean6778 View Post
    Didn't LANG go 3-0 yesterday? Just saying...
    Nope, went 2-1 -14 dimes, if you faded him then you would've went 1-2 but won 7 dimes

    CHARITY DONOR
    12/13/2011 $25 donation

    iPad
    WINNER
    SBR Store 10/12/2011


  25. #25

  26. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarkTX View Post
    I understand Lang is a long term loser but I'm not backing off my plays just because Lang is on them. Lang actually has some good points on both these picks tonight. Yes fading Land long term has been proven sound but cherry picking anybody is not - like I said earlier - anyone can get lucky - that is why I'll stand by my 2 picks here. Even a blind squirrel like Lang finds a nut once in a while
    you see you are not a true Fader we dont read his analysis looking for insight or "good points" we look for comedy like calling quaterbacks the wrong name or teams by the wrong nick name or gettin the coaches name wrong. I am not saying your way is wrong just saying probably the wrong thread for you

  27. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ocean6778 View Post
    Didn't LANG go 3-0 yesterday? Just saying...
    yea if you took his advice to buy 4.5 points (never get beat by the hook)

  28. #28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NeVa_CaSh View Post
    you see you are not a true Fader we dont read his analysis looking for insight or "good points" we look for comedy you
    OH WE CAN DIVE INTO LANG'S ANALYSIS!!! HE IS SO GOOD AT LOSING HE DOESN'T REALIZE HOW HIS TERRIBLE WRITE-UPS ALMOST COMPARE TO HIS WORSE HANDICAPPING

    "As good as the Redskins have been, as good as they have played, I have sat back and watched this guy give games away."
    WHICH GUY? MR. REDSKINS? OK, EVEN IF YOU COULDN'T COME UP WITH CAMPBELL'S NAME OFF THE TOP OF YOUR HEAD, HE HASN'T BEEN THE REASON THEY HAVE LOST GAMES OF LATE
    EDGE: Push

    "I am aware of how good Washington has been playing, covering 5 in a row and against the likes of the Broncos, Cowboys, Eagles, Saints and Raiders."
    HE JUST LISTED 4 PLAYOFFS TEAMS (Cowboys are in as of today)
    EDGE: WASHINGTON

    If you look closer at those 5 games they could have very easily won all 5 of those SU but fact of the matter is they didn't.
    SINCE HE PICKS GAMES ATS!!!!! HE FURTHERS MAKES HIS POINT FOR THE SKINDS
    EDGE: WASHINGTON

    Campbell has looked really good lately, but I have trusted him way too many times in exact situations like this only to have him implode.
    CAMPBELL HAS LOOKED GOOD LATELY, TIME FOR LANG TO GO AGAINST HIM!
    EDGE: WASHINGTON

    As for the Giants, they came off the big win over Dallas to a loss at home to Philly, a game they came back from 14-0 down to take a 31-30 lead only to lose 45-38.
    THEY WERE DOWN 2 TD'S AND GAVE UP 45 POINTS!!!! GREAT INFO
    EDGE: WASHINGTON

    They got the big plays to beat Dallas, but gave up the big play to lose to Philly. What favors New York here is the fact the Redskins are not a big play offense.
    I BET SANTANA MOSS HAS ONE OF THE HIGHEST % OF YARDS GAINED ON SCREEN AND REVERSE PLAYS, BECAUSE HE SUCKS BUT BREAKS BIG PLAYS
    EDGE: PUSH

    Also, when it comes to the NFC East you have always had a weird dynamic involving Dallas, Philly, Giants and Redskins.
    Washington plays the Eagles and Cowboys tough, but struggle against the Giants. While the Giants always battle hard versus Philly and Dallas, but have their way with Washington.
    ALRIGHT, WE CAN GIVE YOU THAT ONE, THE GIANTS BATTLE HARD
    EDGE: NEW YORK

    No matter how badly this Giants team has been lately the numbers strongly support New York being the play here.
    EDGE: EVERYONE WHO FADES LANG ALL THE TIME, EVERYDAY, EVERY WEEK, BECAUSE THE NUMBERS STRONGLY SUPPORT PUTTING MONEY IN BANK ACCOUNT BY FADING THE GREATEST THERE EVER WAS.... BRANDON LANG!!!!!!

  29. #29

  30. #30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NeVa_CaSh View Post
    you see you are not a true Fader we dont read his analysis looking for insight or "good points" we look for comedy like calling quaterbacks the wrong name or teams by the wrong nick name or gettin the coaches name wrong. I am not saying your way is wrong just saying probably the wrong thread for you
    Hey no offense taken. You are right I am not a fader. I don't fade Lang and never have but I know a ton of you have and made money - Congrats to you! I know he's a moron. I don't ever listen to what this loser says - I only posted here because I was ALREADY on Lang's side tonight for these 2 picks for my own reasons and came in to read his schtick. My posting in this thread was for banter - not to try and convince anyone to "not" fade Lang. If you fade him I agree that you have to fade him on EVERY play for months and at his exact ratios of unit size - since he'll chase and give back anything he wins. Heck if you all are fading Lang then you are up huge this week. Doesn't matter if he wins or loses tonight - you all win this week. All I was saying was I wasn't going to change my opinion just because Lang was on my side tonight. That would be stupid unless I had been fading him as long as most of these other guys have. I still say the Giants and Suns both win ATS tonight!! But if I'm wrong - I'm wrong. I'll take my lumps. That's why they call it gambling.

    Good luck tonight!

  31. #31

    Default

    I'm very new to betting. In fact, I'm relatively new ot paying attention to sports in the first place, but even I know Lang is a complete idiot.

  32. #32
    20Four7's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-08-07
    Posts: 6,497
    SBR Points: 2082
    Message Me

    Default

    I liked the skins and was confirmed.... I had the suns too but switched to the fade. No opinion on th eNCAAB.

  33. #33

    Default

    I like the Skins, glad this douche on the Giants. He's flaming out, after a hot a decent run in November.

  34. #34

    Default

    [COLOR=#000000! important]"I'm very new to betting. In fact, I'm relatively new ot paying attention to sports in the first place, but even I know Lang is a complete idiot."[/COLOR]

    welcome...I wish I could have starting my betting life my fading lang

  35. #35

12 Last
Top