[lordmohs]

11/30 Indiana [A]
Golden State

Note: We won 13 out of 14 [A] bets so far this season! That's 93% win rate on just [A] bets!
Note: We have NEVER lost a single NBA betting series in almost 3 years!

[atlplayer]

FYI, he lost an NBA series last year with Sacramento. Even though not his, it is still a good system. He is beginning to stray from the parameters of the original system and that is going to get people caught in a loss.

[killer59]

He still haven't lost on a bet in the NBA v1 series. I have been with him from the start of this season... And it is also correct with the stats about the A-bets

[allman79]

will somebody tell me how the hell i do this system? for example tonight, what i am supposed to do with the pick(s) if there is any

[atlplayer]

Utah was an A or C bet winner this year. The stats for this season are correct. I stated that he had a loss last year and that he hasn't been undefeated for 3 years. This system has been around for a long time and he didn't create it. He just markets it very well and claims it as his own. There are several screens that go into the determination of whether a series should be played and he has not been following them for most of last season and this season. For example, if you have the worst road record in the league, that series should not be played. Considering the Nets haven't won a game, that should not have been a series.

You can play what he emails blindly or you can play the system. If you play blindly, you will get burned. I can guarantee that if the nets had not have covered, he would have explained how it's not a loss because it was filtered out due to record. Use his emails as guides to "potential" series and make sure to filter each of them.

[russwlms]

You MUST BUY 3POINTS, on every game, the system is a chase of three games so tonight starts INDIANA
Bet INDIANA (A)and buy three points, if they lose tonight then you bet on INDIANA on there next game(B) if they lose that one then you would bet on the final game which would be a (C) bet.

PS; this is the third year I Have used this system and it works to the tune of 99.9%

[allman79]

what do u do when they win say the a bet? is that the end of that betting series? do u buy the 3 pts regardless if their a fav or a dog?

[firstimer]

does tonights play pass all the filters?

and also is chi a play tonight??

[sterling111]

Yes and Yes Allman.

[sterling111]

Chicago is a C bet from the V2 NBA system.

[DanOmaha]

Allman - Good questions, I think I'm going to try this. I just bought Indiana + 3 points (to get from +2.5 to +5.5)

My questions - If they win - do we stop betting?
If they lose - do we change the units for Indiana's next game?

Let me know if I'm following this.

[GGPLAYER]

You guys know there is already a season long thread going on this which was just moved from the NBA thread to the Promotions one. I don't know why the Mods moved it there but they discuss and talk about the picks every day if your looking for more input on things.

[firstimer]

they don.t let you buy 3 points any more way?


also on a dif note if any can help me on nhl on the PL 1.5 -1-0 the odds in between how do they work I think i fig them out but want to make sure before i put money on them 1.5 i no if they loss by 1 i win but what are the points between and how do they win?? thanks a milllll

[johncrud]

What did JM say about Chicago being a v2.0 play.. I am attempted to take a stab at it. Historically, Chicago has been killing Mil at home or on the road.

[puppetm716]

Chicago is a C bet from the V2 NBA system.

You might want to check the "filter" on the V2 Chicago "C' being claimed as a play tonight.

11/30 is Chicago's 6th game on the road trip.

In the initial chase games 1,2,3 Chicago covered the 1st game (A), end of chase.

The question is whether to play the backend games 4,5,6 is an additional series chase play. I have seen it posted in other forums and sites in V2 "rules" it states do not play the backend of the 6 games road trip.

Chicago has lost games 4,5 (wagers A + B).

For the record I never "purchased" V2 therefore I don't have the rules in hand.
Anyone who has the official rules, please post for clarification.

To answer another question asked in earlier post.
This system is a 3 game chase.
When you win the wager, The chase is over. You stop and move onto the next.

Best of Luck

[johncrud]

The system is perfect whether you play v1 or v2 or low rpi teams. New Jersy Nets and Knicks, both bottom feeding teams. have won on the first game of the series on the same day.

The point of having a spread is to try to balance out the assumed winner and handicapped team. It is not easy to beat the spread if you are a handicapper. IF there is no spread and juice are even, then life would be rich..

I am going to take a stab at it since this is my first game on a series which is already a C bet. If I lose, big deal.. I lose 2 units.

Lan Nguyen isn't Jesus. If he knows what is the outcome then he wouldn't have sent out that Sac play and his original MLB wouldn't have crashed.

[therber2]

Chicago is not a system play; I wouldn't take that bet. GL if you do...

[puppetm716]

they don.t let you buy 3 points any more way?


also on a dif note if any can help me on nhl on the PL 1.5 -1-0 the odds in between how do they work I think i fig them out but want to make sure before i put money on them 1.5 i no if they loss by 1 i win but what are the points between and how do they win?? thanks a milllll

Many sites don't allow to buy 3 points. You can only buy 2 points. JM's guidelines state buy 2 or 3 points. (of course every once in awhile whenthat 3rd point is needed, it will be a loss instead of a win,push etc).

As far as your NHL question not sure what you mean.
In NHL if you take the puckline (+1.5) you are getting +1.5 goals. If the team loses by 1 goal you still win. But you have to pay for this dearly. The odds for the puckline are usually in the -280 to -300 range. If team is a favorite you are supposed to wager moneyline.

If betting hockey you really have to wager small because if you go to game "C" you have to risk major $$$.

ex. last week Buff game A (+1.5) was -130 to win 50. Buff lost A
B wager is to recoup A losses ($130) plus make your profit desired ($50)
Buff B (+1.5) was -280 which ended up being a wager of $504 to win $180 (130 + 50). Buff lost B wager.

Now the C wager will be to recoup losses from A (130) + B (504) plus make the profit desired (50). Your wager would be to win ($684). The Buff C wager odds (+1.5) at Philly were -300 (at some sites). That would mean you have to wager $2055 to win $685) yikes. Many will chicken out (me included) on this wager.
When the dust settled, Buff won the game outright 4-2 thus won the C wager and the chase.

Just trying to show that in hockey to win $50 in that Buff chase, you would end up risking $2055 because it went to the C.

Alot of you guys think its so easy to just jump into "this system" and make $$.
Sure everything is fine and dandy when the wager wins on the A. But wait until you have 2 or 3 series going on at the same time and they all go to the C at the same time. As the Buff ex showed, are you willing to risk $2000 to win the $50 or
if 3 at the same time $6000 to net $150.

You really should learn the system fully before diving in head first so you can truly understand what you are getting into.

Just trying to help.

Best of Luck

p.s. wear a snorkel

[johncrud]

As many pro-gamblers say, don't never attach your emotions to gambling or else you will never be a winner.

But it is confirmed that humans can never detach their emotions when it comes down to gambling. only a few can..

1)chickening out on the last play of the series
2) handicapping even you have a system in front of you. (regretting that they should have played and won)
3) fading jm picks just to find out they regret it. (I have seen many of this before)

[puppetm716]

You can only get the best lines available.

There will be contravercial games where the outcome will be decided by 1 or .5 points,

But remember, JM always gets the best lines and always wins.
It's already happened with Utah.



Best of Luck

[GGPLAYER]

For today the Indiana line came out as +1.5 and the line has moved to +2.5. But I can only buy 2 points making it +4.5. The JM System says buy 3 points so in retrospect I guess I'm good lol.

You have to line shop for sure. I wait on underdogs and it usually rewards me. I only buy 2 points and have yet to lose.

[allman79]

im on bookmeaker and cant buy any points

[allman79]

how do u do it? i go to str8 bets, take indy, and it asks how much and the next screen is the confirm and thats it? how do u do it? thanks

[allman79]

i see, when ur placing the wager, u have to press the arrow

[johncrud]

Boston is v2.0 play? Did JM confirm this?

[sharpie25]

As many pro-gamblers say, don't never attach your emotions to gambling or else you will never be a winner.

But it is confirmed that humans can never detach their emotions when it comes down to gambling. only a few can..

1)chickening out on the last play of the series
2) handicapping even you have a system in front of you. (regretting that they should have played and won)
3) fading jm picks just to find out they regret it. (I have seen many of this before)

love the 3 rules bro.i always stick by them with this system.

[andywend]

Every single one of these "filters" added to the system were added solely to erase prior series losses.

This is why "backtesting" any system is worthless.

Russwlms said the following:

PS; this is the third year I Have used this system and it works to the tune of 99.9%

99.9% works out to the system winning 999 out of every 1000 series which is absolutely untrue.

The best possible price you can get buying 3 points is -170 which means you have to win 19 out of every 20 series just to break even.

The buying 3 points and chasing your losses through a 3 game series is NOT what makes this system work if it indeed works at all. The adding of all these "filters" is done to make the prior record look better.

If the system does work, I would bet you would do far better simply betting a fixed amount on each game without buying the points and without chasing your losses.
---------------------------------------------------
After reading the initial post in this thread talking about the (A) bets winning at 93% this year, you just knew Indiana was going to lose tonight.

Final Score - Golden State 126, Indiana 107

[johncrud]

the second rule was an example of what occured last night. people were doing handicapping work too much on chicago.. i didnt sway a bit by their opinion and picked the chicago without any hesitation. a winner is a winner regardless how dramatic the game ends.


oh yeah.. in general after a game ends, it is enjoyable to watch how people are bashing the team, claiming the game fixed, feeling sick to the point of throwing up, or whatever. man, full blown emotions everywhere...

[puppetm716]

Just because Chicago covered doesn't justify making them a play. Congrats on a wager win.

[puppetm716]

The buying 3 points and chasing your losses through a 3 game series is NOT what makes this system work if it indeed works at all. The adding of all these "filters" is done to make the prior record look better.

If the system does work, I would bet you would do far better simply betting a fixed amount on each game without buying the points and without chasing your losses.

if you followed "the system" the last few years you would see that your statements are not true.

Best of Luck whatever road you choose to follow.