View New Posts
  1. #1

    Default Docs NBA 11/24

    3-Unit Play #504 Take Washington -2 1/2 Over Philadelphia (7 p.m. EST, Tuesday)
    Both of these teams are cruddy but we think that they are both pretty equal right now and we will give the home squad the edge as we feel the home team in this series should win by 5-6 points. Washington has played a more road-heavy schedule with 7 road games compared to 5 at home and we feel their slate has been a bit tougher as well. Since the Sixers only two road wins have come against New Jersey and the Knicks, this would be their first “quality win” of the season on the road and we don’t see it happening. The Wiz Kids also knocked off the Cavs in their last home contest and we think that could have them showing some extra confidence when returning home tonight after two tough road losses.

    3-Unit Play #509 Take Oklahoma City/Utah UNDER 197 (9 p.m. EST, Tuesday)
    The under is 6-2 in the last eight meetings between these teams and the under is also 15-6 in the Jazz last 21 home games stretching back to last season. We think the Thunder are an underrated defensive club and they are No. 5 in the league for points allowed, No. 6 for defensive FG % and No. 4 for three-point % allowed. Utah has been playing pretty solid defense lately too as they have allowed only 94 PPG in their last five games, and there was one OT game thrown in there as well.

    4-unit Play #507 Take New Jersey/Denver UNDER 203 (9 p.m. EST, Tuesday)
    New Jersey has only played two games this season (out of 13) that got anywhere near 200 for the combined score. Two of those games went well over 200 and one of those was against this same Denver team. Thanks to that game we get a much higher number in this one and we think there is value on the under. The Nets can’t get into a shootout with Denver, they know what happened last time in that high scoring game (a 28-point Denver win). This New Jersey is 11-2 this season for the under because they try and slow the game down in order to be close enough to win because they have some nice defensive pieces but not a lot of offensive weapons. In the last game Denver shot 53% from the field and 56% from three-point land and we expect those numbers to come back down to Earth a bit. Even if the Nuggets are able to score a ton of points then we think the game will be a blowout and we just don’t see NJ scoring enough to get this one over the posted number
    Points Awarded:

    jcygts6 gave olemiss33 1 SBR Point(s) for this post.

    saviola80 gave olemiss33 3 SBR Point(s) for this post.


  2. #2
    jcygts6's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 04-05-09
    Posts: 2,973
    Message Me

    Default

    thanks!
    1150pts

    TOP SPORTSBOOK
    WINNER
    5/11/2012

    1262pts

    TOP SPORTSBOOK
    WINNER
    5/17/2012


  3. #3

  4. #4

  5. #5

    Default

    Eh he did not lose by much so I say good job and keep it up!

  6. #6
    Preston09's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 05-19-09
    Posts: 1,823
    SBR Points: 108
    Message Me

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SOCALSCOTT View Post
    2 tough losses
    Very tough...

  7. #7
    jcygts6's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 04-05-09
    Posts: 2,973
    Message Me

    Default

    yea seriously.. especially the utah total
    1150pts

    TOP SPORTSBOOK
    WINNER
    5/11/2012

    1262pts

    TOP SPORTSBOOK
    WINNER
    5/17/2012


  8. #8

    Default

    Agree on Utah Under. It was a 93 Second half. But 1st Quarter alone was big

  9. #9

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hartalino View Post
    Doc is not very good.

    Doc is good.

    It is a tough business. No capper consistently does better than the low-to-mid 60% range.

    Doc is one of the best hoops cappers i know

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hartalino View Post
    Doc is not very good.
    Prepare to get flamed by Preston09


    EDIT: Also hockey216
    Last edited by AlwaysDrawing; 11-25-09 at 10:56 AM. Reason: hockey proved me right.
    1995pts

    TOP SPORTSBOOK
    WINNER
    5/16/2012


  12. #12

    Default

    Yea - people tend to forget his days when he goes 3-0 and is up 11 units. Its easy to get mad when he goes 1-2 and your down 2.6 units but you need to look at the season as a whole. And if you think he is that bad - fade him!!

  13. #13

  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim87675 View Post
    Yea - people tend to forget his days when he goes 3-0 and is up 11 units. Its easy to get mad when he goes 1-2 and your down 2.6 units but you need to look at the season as a whole. And if you think he is that bad - fade him!!

    Yea, Hartalino. Fade DOC for a whole season and i'll tail him for a whole season... no brainer.

    it's easy to get pissed off when you go 1-2 but look at long run.

    You wont be saying that on his 3-0 up 11 unit days

  15. #15

    Default

    Think today i might lay down a teaser of Docs picks.....he picks the right games to handicap but is barely missing.

  16. #16

    Default

    Good idea, grif, he hasn't been crazily off all year, usually just missing by a basket or two. Today has the makings for a big day....

  17. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by griffreds View Post
    Think today i might lay down a teaser of Docs picks.....he picks the right games to handicap but is barely missing.

    I know a lot of ppl on here like them.

    But i don't find value in teasers. Do the math - the book shortchanges you.

    I think you're better off firing each play individually.

    Lets say you have 3 teams. you go 2-1 ATS, but the loss is a big loss. Teaser lose, play separate, profitable day.

    I see the attraction that it's easy to cover with 8 more points, etc...


    but i still don't like it. Think they shortchange you on the value.

  18. #18

    Default

    Yeah, I read on some website that you would have to tease a decent number of points down to find as good a value in basketball that you would in football, but Doc has been barely missing on some of these games. Yesterday- miss Wizards by 2, miss Jazz under by 1. Are we expecting Doc to get this close to the lines every time? No. But on more than a few occasions it would have been profitable to tease down a couple of points.

  19. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hockey216 View Post
    I know a lot of ppl on here like them.

    But i don't find value in teasers. Do the math - the book shortchanges you.

    I think you're better off firing each play individually.

    Lets say you have 3 teams. you go 2-1 ATS, but the loss is a big loss. Teaser lose, play separate, profitable day.

    I see the attraction that it's easy to cover with 8 more points, etc...


    but i still don't like it. Think they shortchange you on the value.

    I've been looking at the 2nd half lines, and adding them back into the current score, then taking games that give me 6 or more points better of a line, than if I took it for the whole game. It's a brand new thing I've been trying, but so far it's 7-3. I'm curious to see if it keeps up!

  20. #20

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by phillybets View Post
    I've been looking at the 2nd half lines, and adding them back into the current score, then taking games that give me 6 or more points better of a line, than if I took it for the whole game. It's a brand new thing I've been trying, but so far it's 7-3. I'm curious to see if it keeps up!
    Oh, and forgot to add: My theory here is that it's basically like getting a game on the 'teaser' line...But you don't have to win both to win your bet...the final result is still individual bets

Top