COLLEGE FOOTBALL
Central Michigan (8-2, 7-2 ATS) at Ball State (1-9, 5-5 ATS)
Central Michigan looks to remain the only unbeaten team in the Mid-American Conference and move another step closer to the West Division championship when it travels to Ball State Stadium for a divisional tussle with the Cardinals.
The Chippewas spotted Toledo leads of 7-0 and 14-7 last Wednesday ? the first time all year they trailed a conference opponent ? then scored six unanswered touchdowns en route to a 56-28 nationally televised rout, covering as a 17?-point home favorite. Star QB Dan LeFevour ? four-year starter ? stole the show again, accounting for six of his team?s eight touchdowns (2 passing, 4 rushing), and he finished 29 of 36 passing for 341 yards to go with 19 rushing yards on 14 carries, and Central Michigan rolled up 507 total yards.
The Chippewas lead Northern Illinois by one game in the MAC West Division. If Northern Illinois wins at Ohio on Saturday, those teams will square off for the division title at Central Michigan next week no matter the result of this game.
Ball State has followed up its only win of the season ? a 29-27 victory over still-winless Eastern Michigan ? with a pair of narrow losses to Ohio (20-17 at home) and Northern Illinois (26-20 on the road). On the bright side, the Cardinals covered as an underdog in both games, improving to 5-3 ATS in their last eight (5-2 ATS as a ?dog). Ball State, which is 1-11 SU since starting last year 12-0, has scored 20 points or fewer in eight of its last 10 games (including four of its last five)
On the way to their perfect regular season last year, the Cardinals knocked off Central Michigan 31-24 as a six-point road favorite in a battle for the division title. Ball State ended a four-game SU and three-game ATS losing skid to the Chippewas with last year?s victory, despite getting outgained 466-407 and despite LeFevour?s 345-yard, two-TD passing day. The road team is 4-1 ATS in the last five meetings, and CMU has cashed in five of its last six trips to Ball State Stadium.
Both teams can run the football ? Central Michigan averages 169.7 rushing yards per game (4.6 per carry) and Ball State averages 163.2 rushing ypg (4.5 per carry) ? but otherwise, the Chippewas are much stronger offensively. They put up 33.1 points, 402.5 total yards and 232.8 passing yards per game, while the Cardinals net just 20.5 points, 307 total yards and 143.8 passing yards per outing.
Central Michigan also has big advantages on defense, allowing 18 points and 341 yards per game (119 rushing ypg), compared with Ball State?s 28.6 points and 366.5 total yards allowed per contest (155.1 rushing ypg).
The Chippewas are on ATS runs of 37-15-3 overall, 11-5-2 on the road, 23-8-2 as a favorite, 5-1 as a chalk of more than 10 points, 23-7-2 against MAC foes and 18-6-2 versus losing teams. Ball State is 6-1 ATS in its last seven when catching more than 10 points and 4-1 in its last six in November, but it has failed to cover in five of six at home and four of five as a home pup.
The over is now 7-1 in Central Michigan?s last eight games, but otherwise the team is on ?under? runs of 4-0 on the road, 4-1 as a road chalk, 4-1 on grass and 5-0 after a spread-cover. Ball State is riding ?under? streaks of 4-1 overall (all in conference), 4-1 at home, 4-0 as an underdog and 8-2 in November. Finally, the last two series meetings in Ball State went over the total.
ATS ADVANTAGE: CENTRAL MICHIGAN
Buffalo (3-7, 4-6 ATS) at Miami (Ohio) (1-10, 5-6 ATS)
Two MAC teams just playing for nothing but pride get national television exposure for the third straight week, with Buffalo visiting MAC East rival Miami (Ohio).
The Bulls have lost three straight games by a total of seven points, the last two at home to Bowling Green (30-29 as a three-point favorite) and Ohio (27-24 as a 1?-point chalk). Buffalo?s last four games (all against MAC opponents) were decided by four points or less, and its last five conference contests were decided by a total of 18 points, with the Buffs going 1-4 SU and 2-3 ATS.
Miami?s lone victory of the season came against Toledo on Halloween ? 31-24 as a five-point home underdog ? but the Redhawks followed that with a 34-32 loss at Temple (covering as a 17-point underdog) and a 35-14 setback to Bowling Green on Thursday as a four-point home pup. Despite last week?s non-cover, Miami is still 5-2 ATS in its last seven (all as an underdog), which follows a 4-15 ATS slide.
Since opening the season with a 23-17 upset win at UTEP as a 10?-point underdog, Buffalo is 0-3 SU and 1-2 ATS on the highway. Meanwhile, going back to the end of the 2007 season the Redhawks are 3-22 SU, including 2-15 in MAC play and 1-9 at home against Division I-A competition.
Buffalo averaged 18.6 ppg in its first five games, but its offense has come to life in the last five, putting up an average of 29 ppg, tallying 24 or more in each contest. Meanwhile, the Redhawks had scored season-highs of 31 and 32 points in consecutive games before mustering just the two touchdowns against Bowling Green last week. Miami, which was shutout in its first two games against Kentucky (42-0) and Boise State (48-0), has scored 14 points or less in six of its 11 games this year.
Buffalo ended a 10-game, all-time series losing skid to Miami with last year?s 37-17 rout at home, finishing with a 476-383 edge in total offense (216-142 rushing). The Bulls have covered in three straight meetings, including a 31-28 loss as a 6?-point underdog in their last trip to Fred Yager Stadium in 2007.
The Bulls have cashed in 11 of their last 14 road games, but they?ve failed to cover in seven straight games as a favorite. The Redhawks? current 5-2 ATS overall run is offset by pointspread nosedives of 6-13 in MAC contests, 4-9 at home, 2-7 in November and 8-21-1 against teams with a losing record.
Buffalo is on ?over? stretches of 7-2 on the road, 6-2 as a favorite, 25-10 in conference and 5-1 in November. On the other hand, Miami is on ?under? runs of 5-2 overall (all as a ?dog), 4-1 at home (all as a ?dog) and 5-1 when playing on grass. Finally, the over is 5-1 in the last six head-to-head meetings, with the last four in a row topping the posted total.
ATS ADVANTAGE: BUFFALO and OVER
Reply With Quote