View New Posts
12
  1. #1

    Default Brandon Lang 11/9

    LANG

    Monday's Selection ...
    Note:
    I gave you 3 underdog outright winners Saturday with Kansas St, Stanford, and Purdue.

    I follow that up with two more dogs on Sunday with Carolina, and the big play on the Chargers, and even a miracle pick six cover with Seattle as the free pick.

    The entire day however was about San Diego winning the game outright.

    The last Chargers drive was the epitome of the Giants season as I illustrated in my breakdown on Sunday. They went right down the field without resistance.

    Truth of the matter: Chargers were in control of that game from start to finish. There's your 5 point dog to win outright making it a perfect 5-0 weekend.

    The NFL season has hit it's halfway mark, and I'm telling you right now that I am just getting this train started. You will see nothing but consistency in a very positive way.

    We have arrived at the launch pad, and we are now ready to take off as this 2nd half of the season is going to be epic.

    We will keep building up for the bowl games, NFL playoffs and you already know my "Super Bowl" history.

    It's about to get really good, really fast. Simple as that.

    Now watch me bang home this Monday winner and make it a 3-day run of +100 dimes and considering how on fire I have been with weeknight college football winners, it's shaping up to be another big winning week.

    Long way to go here in 2009. Long way to go. Let's keep the winning momentum going tonight.

    15 DIME - PITTSBURGH STEELERS - (if line is 3 1/2 you buy the 1/2 and lay 3. If it's 3 you buy the 1/2 and lay 2 1/2.) Who do you trust tonight? Ben Rothliesberger of Kyle Orton?

    For my dollar, it's Big Ben. Simple as that.

    Last week the Broncos were exposed by an aggressive Ravens defense that had a week to prepare for Mr.Orton and the Denver offense.

    Baltimore flat owned Orton all day long with a variety of blitzes, stunts and just an all out great gameplan defensively.

    Now the Steelers come in here off a bye week, and if you don't think for one second Dick Lebeau won't have an even better gameplan for Orton, then you don't know Lebeau.

    I am not taking anything away from their 6-1 start, it's been great but if you really examine it, they are a couple of plays away from being 4-3.

    They should have never beaten Cincinnati with the deflected pass, Dallas was 1st and goal inside the last minute and couldn't punch it in.

    And the Patriots blew a 14 point 2nd half lead which is something a Bill Belichick coached team just doesn't do.

    My question is this. If the Broncos were 4-3 what would this line be tonight? Steelers -6...-7?

    Value in this game tonight sides with the Steelers.

    Now I know what you are thinking. You are thinking the Steelers haven't played anybody. Only 3 of their 7 opponents have a better than .500 record while the Broncos played 5 of 7.

    So you are correct in your thinking. The Steelers have had it pretty easy so far this year but you can't discount the advantage Pittsburgh has coming in here off their bye week. It is huge.

    Would I be tempted to take Denver if the Steelers didn't have 2 weeks to prepare? Oh most certainly.

    But you give me the defending Super Bowl champs 2 weeks to gameplan you, and I will gladly roll the dice with Pittsburgh every time.

    I just can't get the Ravens game out of my mind. Just can't.

    The Broncos offense was just terrible and what concerned me even more was Denver had 2 weeks to prepare a great gameplan in which to attack the Ravens. I'm talking 2 full weeks to prepare and here is what you got.

    10 drives total for the game with 8 of those drives ending with a punt. 3 times they went 3 and out. 2 times they picked up one first down and then punted. 200 total yards for the game. 3 of 13 on 3rd down. Average yards per play 3.4 yards.

    You were able to do all that with 2 weeks to prepare!?!? A lot of teams start off the year being perceived as much better than they are until they start really facing good defenses at which time your offensive weaknesses start getting exposed.

    I mean, let's be honest here folks, he is still Kyle Orton and he will never be confused with John Elway.

    As far as Pittsburgh is concerned, they seem to always peak in November and December. It is their mantra to start slow and finish strong.

    The fact of the matter is Denver will not be able to consistently run the football which means, just like last week, winning this game will fall squarley on the shoulders of Orton. He failed miserably last week and he will again fail miserably this week.

    He couldn't do a thing versus the Ravens defense last week, and I saw nothing in that game which leads me to believe he will be able to do a thing against Pittsburgh's defense tonight.

    And your 3rd string right tackle faces Harrison all night long. Ouch.

    Bottom line is this. If Kyle Orton plays perfect football tonight and beats me, I will tip my cap to him but quite frankly I don't see that happening.

    Since he took over as head coach of the Pittsburgh Steelers, Mike Tomlin has coached his team 4 times on Monday night. He is 4-0.

    Let's go ahead and make him 5-0 as the Steelers defense makes it a long night for Mr. Orton and Big Ben does what Big Ben always does, come up big in the big game in front of the Monday night crowd.

  2. #2

    Default

    could lang keep it rolling? i like what i see

  3. #3

    Default

    I'm just an NFL fan, no one special, but how could this not be the right play? Steelers dominate every aspect of this game. Off a bye week, more experienced coach, better QB, better offense, better defense, more high-pressure game experience, used to cold weather etc etc etc. Only thing Broncos have going for them is home field and a little hot streak. I am really amazed at the amount of Dever picks tonight. I think Steelers cover easily, and no I am not a Steelers fan. Anyone see this differently? And on top of all that, my book changed the line to -2.5.....seriously, I am confused?

  4. #4

    Default

    Yeah I already took Pit.. I am a little confused also?

  5. #5

    Default

    It's obvious the books want everyone on Steelers -3.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Saluki09 View Post
    It's obvious the books want everyone on Steelers -3.
    Huh? Why would they lower it to -2.5 then? Now basically if Steelers win, they cover, unless the rare case of a 1-2 pt game...unlikely.

  7. #7

    Default

    Maybe Lang is coming around. His reasoning is really good. There is a reason that the odds are favoring Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh only loses if they beat themselves. For as great as their offense and defense are they are a very poor special teams team and as we know this can tip the balance. If Royal takes one to the house it will be the third game in a row that the Steelers allowed this. Food for thought!

  8. #8

    Default

    Sigh.. I'm on the same side as Lang and he's due for a loss.. Hopefully he comes through tonight and keeps his streak alive!

  9. #9

    Default

    Tread lightly. Public on Pitt 67% and line moves opposite. Means two things...books want you to take Pitt or huge money offsetting the publics money on Denver.

    Denver has a really good defense this year. I would put them up there with Pitt. Especially since Pitt has a couple defensive players banged up.

  10. #10

    Default

    Well, even so, if you say the defenses are about equal with Pitt's banged up defensive players...what about all the other aspects of the game that tilt towards the Steelers. Just making conversation with you Chaseblack. Comparing offenses, QBs, experience, etc...there is still a huge mismatch. Also, just to throw this out there, not that it matters in the least, but nearly all the ESPN crew is on Steelers for Pigskin Pickem as well as both "Mike and Mike." Again, not that this matters, but they are people who research and analyze games for a living with no financial ties to either team. Denver could get lucky again, but on paper Steelers are the better team.

  11. #11

    Default

    I agree with eerything you are saying. Only thing is if you follow the teams that espn says will win and you bet on those you will lose your ass!!! First off they hardly pick 60% on teams to win the game much less with putting the lines into play. This is all good convo. At times I watch espn to see who they like and take the points and go against them. Espn is the public and the public does not win in the longrun!!!

  12. #12

    Default

    only squares are on the steelers i luv that langs on pitt

  13. #13

  14. #14

    Default

    I laugh at his write-ups and videos. The guy is a proven loser. So he goes 5-0... it happens but he won't keep this up. "simple as that" LOL

    Lang is back on the public tonight with Pittsburgh. He's got all the faders gun-shy now. Watch it, Denver will win outright.

  15. #15
    Preston09's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 05-19-09
    Posts: 1,823
    SBR Points: 108
    Message Me

    Default

    I hope he wins tonight.....

  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PhatBaztard View Post
    Huh? Why would they lower it to -2.5 then? Now basically if Steelers win, they cover, unless the rare case of a 1-2 pt game...unlikely.
    Its called Reverse Line Movement, regardless on it being -3 or -2.5 w/e they want you to take Pitt.
    Points Awarded:

    birdman779 gave Saluki09 2 SBR Point(s) for this post.


  17. #17
    yisman's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 09-01-08
    Posts: 42,133
    SBR Points: 1057
    Message Me

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soccerplayer View Post

    Truth of the matter: Chargers were in control of that game from start to finish.
    What a complete moron. Lang, you friggin' dumbass.
    150pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY7th Place 5/29/2012

    663pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 5/20/2012

    5,880

    SBR POKER TOP 100

    96th Place 11/1/2011

    iPad
    WINNER
    SBR Casino 10/31/2011

    400pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY1st Place 5/30/2012


  18. #18

    Default

    where all the fade lang people now after lang go 5 0 on the weekend everyone shut up now

  19. #19
    yisman's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 09-01-08
    Posts: 42,133
    SBR Points: 1057
    Message Me

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zigomanisinsider View Post
    where all the fade lang people now after lang go 5 0 on the weekend everyone shut up now
    idiocy. Fading Lang is very profitable. One or two good days in a row for him changes nothing. He's still stupid, and he's still an awful handicapper.
    150pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY7th Place 5/29/2012

    663pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 5/20/2012

    5,880

    SBR POKER TOP 100

    96th Place 11/1/2011

    iPad
    WINNER
    SBR Casino 10/31/2011

    400pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY1st Place 5/30/2012


  20. #20

    Default

    Lang forgot to fade himself like he did the past 2 days with the PITT pick today. DEN +3.5 easy winner !

  21. #21

  22. #22
    yisman's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 09-01-08
    Posts: 42,133
    SBR Points: 1057
    Message Me

    Default

    http://therxforum.com/showpost.php?p...ostcount=12102

    i heard lang was on Quality Road and the horse found out right before post time
    150pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY7th Place 5/29/2012

    663pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 5/20/2012

    5,880

    SBR POKER TOP 100

    96th Place 11/1/2011

    iPad
    WINNER
    SBR Casino 10/31/2011

    400pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY1st Place 5/30/2012


  23. #23

  24. #24
    Preston09's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 05-19-09
    Posts: 1,823
    SBR Points: 108
    Message Me

    Default

    He's down over 1000 dimes this year and he has a 5-0 weekend and now the faders are supposed to shut up? What a f\*g! The fade will continue as long as BLang is alive.......

  25. #25

  26. #26
    yisman's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 09-01-08
    Posts: 42,133
    SBR Points: 1057
    Message Me

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Preston09 View Post
    He's down over 1000 dimes this year and he has a 5-0 weekend and now the faders are supposed to shut up? What a f\*g! The fade will continue as long as BLang is alive.......
    Exactly right.

    Even awful handicappers have good runs once in a while.

    Lang is down a tremendous amount on the year.

    He could win his next 30 (20 dimes per game average) and still be down.
    150pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY7th Place 5/29/2012

    663pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 5/20/2012

    5,880

    SBR POKER TOP 100

    96th Place 11/1/2011

    iPad
    WINNER
    SBR Casino 10/31/2011

    400pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY1st Place 5/30/2012


  27. #27

  28. #28

  29. #29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by edge323 View Post
    I think Lang is starting to fade himself

    I think Pittsburgh was a easy winner tonight, Denver is overrated team, with a average quarterback, only way the Steelers wouldn't win is if they turned the ball over. He did good on Saturday, but this guy has been bad all year, I would never consistently tail the guy, ever.

  30. #30

  31. #31

  32. #32

    Default

    lang train rolls on. calm down guys, there's a new week of bad plays looming in the distance

  33. #33
    yisman's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 09-01-08
    Posts: 42,133
    SBR Points: 1057
    Message Me

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jheat23 View Post
    I think Pittsburgh was a easy winner tonight, Denver is overrated team, with a average quarterback, only way the Steelers wouldn't win is if they turned the ball over. He did good on Saturday, but this guy has been bad all year, I would never consistently tail the guy, ever.
    You'd be hard-pressed to find someone who consistently tails Lang.

    The question is whether to fade him.

    I say yes.
    150pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY7th Place 5/29/2012

    663pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 5/20/2012

    5,880

    SBR POKER TOP 100

    96th Place 11/1/2011

    iPad
    WINNER
    SBR Casino 10/31/2011

    400pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY1st Place 5/30/2012


  34. #34

  35. #35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by birdman779 View Post
    only squares are on the steelers i luv that langs on pitt

    You are a fool. My bet had nothing to do with "what the public was betting" or tailing/fading Lang, or any of that. It was based on the fact that I freaking watch football all day on Sunday and I know enough about the sport to "sometimes" pick my own winners. C'mon, this was obvious just based on knowing the teams. Regardless of "reverse line movement" and all that other sh*t. Did you really think Orton and Denver were going to outplay the same team that just won the Superbowl. You probably went out and bought a Broncos jersey when they went 6-1, keep drinking the Kool-aid, follower. If you just blindly follow or fade any handicapper without a brain, welcome to your short lived gambling career!

12 Last
Top