Anybody got lang's lock?
| Poster's Sportsbook Poll: 2011View Poll Results | ||
| # 1 5Dimes | 450 total points | 5Dimes Review |
| # 2 Pinnacle | 408 total points | Pinnacle Review |
| # 3 Heritage | 227 total points | Heritage Review |
| # 4 Bookmaker | 138 total points | Bookmaker Review |
| # 5 BetIslands | 129 total points | BetIslands Review |
| SBR Top-Rated SportsbooksRecommended List | ||
| Pinnacle Sports | SBR Rating A+ | Pinnacle Sports Review |
| 5Dimes | SBR Rating A+ | 5Dimes Review |
| BookMaker | SBR Rating A+ | BookMaker Review |
| Legends | SBR Rating A+ | Legends Review |
| Bodog | SBR Rating A | Bodog Review |
-
10-26-09 01:32 PM #1
Lang 10/26
-
10-26-09 02:27 PM #2
-
10-26-09 02:32 PM #3
haha everyone waiting on langer
saw that his free pick was the under.
dunno about his actual play tonight yet...
-
10-26-09 02:37 PM #4
Don't worry some will post it as soon as it's available on another forum.
-
10-26-09 02:38 PM #5
Monday's Selection ...
10 DIME - WASHINGTON REDSKINS - Andy Reid can't be trusted to coach a team on the road laying more than a touchdown. Anytime anywhere. He proved that in Oakland.
Last year the Redskins were dreadful, just as bad as this year, and it didn't matter when playing their division rival as they beat them both times.
This is a match up dream for Washington and it's the reason they have covered 6 of the last 8 between these two with a push. They just match up well with anything the Eagles want to do.
In watching the Raiders get completely destroyed yesterday at Oakland, I kept asking myself the whole game how on God's earth the Eagles lost to the Raiders? How could they have possibly lost to that poor excuse of a football team?
At the end of the Jets-Raiders game I had my answer. The Eagles are NOT as good as everyone is making them out to be!
They have only played one team this year with a winning record, so who are the Eagles to be laying this kind of number against anybody right now?
They have played the Panthers, Saints, Chiefs, Bucs, and the Raiders this year, and only the Saints have a winning record.
The bottom line for me is if you can't beat Raiders on the road scoring only 9 points, then for my dollar tonight I can't have any confidence you can cover more than a touchdown against a division rival.
I know all the bad numbers surrounding the Redskins tonight, but their is a reason the underdog in every single one of their games have covered the number. Their defense is pretty darn good.
The Redskins were catching 6 1/2 at New York to start the year and got the cover and were catching 5 at Carolina and got the cover.
I look for them to go to 3-0 ATS as an underdog this year.
FREE SELECTION - PHILADELPHIA-WASHINGTON UNDER
-
10-26-09 02:39 PM #6 Here you go, you sickos! Lang's fade...err...play.
10 DIME - WASHINGTON REDSKINS - Andy Reid can't be trusted to coach a team on the road laying more than a touchdown. Anytime anywhere. He proved that in Oakland.
Last year the Redskins were dreadful, just as bad as this year, and it didn't matter when playing their division rival as they beat them both times.
This is a match up dream for Washington and it's the reason they have covered 6 of the last 8 between these two with a push. They just match up well with anything the Eagles want to do.
In watching the Raiders get completely destroyed yesterday at Oakland, I kept asking myself the whole game how on God's earth the Eagles lost to the Raiders? How could they have possibly lost to that poor excuse of a football team?
At the end of the Jets-Raiders game I had my answer. The Eagles are NOT as good as everyone is making them out to be!
They have only played one team this year with a winning record, so who are the Eagles to be laying this kind of number against anybody right now?
They have played the Panthers, Saints, Chiefs, Bucs, and the Raiders this year, and only the Saints have a winning record.
The bottom line for me is if you can't beat Raiders on the road scoring only 9 points, then for my dollar tonight I can't have any confidence you can cover more than a touchdown against a division rival.
I know all the bad numbers surrounding the Redskins tonight, but their is a reason the underdog in every single one of their games have covered the number. Their defense is pretty darn good.
The Redskins were catching 6 1/2 at New York to start the year and got the cover and were catching 5 at Carolina and got the cover.
I look for them to go to 3-0 ATS as an underdog this year.
FREE SELECTION - PHILADELPHIA-WASHINGTON UNDER
-
10-26-09 02:39 PM #7 Brand ****InG Lang
Monday's Selection ...
10 DIME - WASHINGTON REDSKINS - Andy Reid can't be trusted to coach a team on the road laying more than a touchdown. Anytime anywhere. He proved that in Oakland.
Last year the Redskins were dreadful, just as bad as this year, and it didn't matter when playing their division rival as they beat them both times.
This is a match up dream for Washington and it's the reason they have covered 6 of the last 8 between these two with a push. They just match up well with anything the Eagles want to do.
In watching the Raiders get completely destroyed yesterday at Oakland, I kept asking myself the whole game how on God's earth the Eagles lost to the Raiders? How could they have possibly lost to that poor excuse of a football team?
At the end of the Jets-Raiders game I had my answer. The Eagles are NOT as good as everyone is making them out to be!
They have only played one team this year with a winning record, so who are the Eagles to be laying this kind of number against anybody right now?
They have played the Panthers, Saints, Chiefs, Bucs, and the Raiders this year, and only the Saints have a winning record.
The bottom line for me is if you can't beat Raiders on the road scoring only 9 points, then for my dollar tonight I can't have any confidence you can cover more than a touchdown against a division rival.
I know all the bad numbers surrounding the Redskins tonight, but their is a reason the underdog in every single one of their games have covered the number. Their defense is pretty darn good.
The Redskins were catching 6 1/2 at New York to start the year and got the cover and were catching 5 at Carolina and got the cover.
I look for them to go to 3-0 ATS as an underdog this year.
FREE SELECTION - PHILADELPHIA-WASHINGTON UNDER
-
10-26-09 02:40 PM #8
dam i like the washington and the over!! oh well i think i will tease philly and over now!!gl
-
10-26-09 02:43 PM #9
Oh my god I thought Lang would be on Philly, in big with Philly Now, the Redskins got Jim Zorn on the sideline no offense and Albert Haynesworth out and this guy has the nerve to say Andy Ried can't be trusted, wow. That's all this guy does is look at the last game.
-
10-26-09 02:44 PM #10
-
10-26-09 02:58 PM #11
right when you posted line went up to 8.0 lol
-
10-26-09 03:02 PM #12
I seen that, I think this game shakes out 28-10 or in that area, Philly can score, Washington can't, Mcnabb has a lot to play for and that defense is well coach against a divisional foe, Redskins have struggled to score on bad teams, they won't score on a very solid team. Thank the Oakland Raiders for easy money again.
Originally Posted by zigomanisinsider
-
10-26-09 03:03 PM #13
I liked Redskins and Under, might have to reconsider.
-
10-26-09 03:06 PM #14
crap, im on Washington and Under already. lol
-
10-26-09 03:12 PM #15
what does lang have the line at
-
10-26-09 03:16 PM #16
"I seen that, I think this game shakes out 28-10 or in that area, Philly can score, Washington can't, Mcnabb has a lot to play for and that defense is well coach against a divisional foe, Redskins have struggled to score on bad teams, they won't score on a very solid team. Thank the Oakland Raiders for easy money again."
Jheat did you take that score right off of Chris Jordan's analysis? Lol, come one man. Thas exactly what he thinks...I actually think it may be somwehere in that range too though. I was thinkin more like 23 - 6...Just giving ya a hard time in case you were trying to grab credit! Im gonna be a no-play as for I have two teasers pending on it already...GL to ya
-
10-26-09 03:51 PM #17
Glad I locked in Philly in the over.. Was worried Lang factor might screw my bets but he's on the opposite side! LAng goes 0-2 tonight fade on!
-
10-26-09 03:53 PM #18
I think this ass Lang is Fading himself and giving his paid customers the shit picks.LOL it wouldent be the first time hint hint Morrison Betting System
-
10-26-09 03:54 PM #19
Philly and the Over... Give me a break. Who plays Washington?
-
10-26-09 03:55 PM #20
-
10-26-09 04:00 PM #21
Wow we had it close I just look at his pick and didn't really read his writeup, I feel pretty good about it now. Don't want any credit, just want to win. Originally Posted by 100Dimes
"I seen that, I think this game shakes out 28-10 or in that area, Philly can score, Washington can't, Mcnabb has a lot to play for and that defense is well coach against a divisional foe, Redskins have struggled to score on bad teams, they won't score on a very solid team. Thank the Oakland Raiders for easy money again."
Jheat did you take that score right off of Chris Jordan's analysis? Lol, come one man. Thas exactly what he thinks...I actually think it may be somwehere in that range too though. I was thinkin more like 23 - 6...Just giving ya a hard time in case you were trying to grab credit! Im gonna be a no-play as for I have two teasers pending on it already...GL to ya
-
10-26-09 06:01 PM #22
Originally Posted by tltaylor89
Your post doesn't make any sense. Do you have any idea of system wagering?
Obviously not because the plays are predetermined.. You can't give out "fade plays" for the system.
Best of luck
-
10-26-09 08:50 PM #23
not looking good so far for Lang, but still the 2nd half to be played
-
10-26-09 08:58 PM #24
never looking good for lang
-
10-26-09 09:02 PM #25
Thanks Lang! Originally Posted by TheSkeptic
crap, im on Washington and Under already. lol
-
10-26-09 09:10 PM #26
-
10-26-09 09:20 PM #27
thanks for the help lang
-
10-26-09 10:28 PM #28
not one point scored in the 2ndhalf un real
1000ptsTOP SPORTSBOOK
WINNER
05/14/2012175 pts3-QUESTION
SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/24/2012
-
10-26-09 10:32 PM #29
thanks lang for the winner
-
10-26-09 10:49 PM #30
-
10-26-09 10:53 PM #31
I finally just faded Lang without even putting a second thought about anything else. I see the picks and the results real time. I have no chioce but to do this. And now I have pocket money that could buy a handsome new suit.
No one can pick as poorly as he does without innate savant qualities. Do not underestimate this man. He is special.
-
10-26-09 10:57 PM #32
eagles / over / +parlay = Thanks Lang!
175 pts3-QUESTION
SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/28/2012
-
10-26-09 11:01 PM #33
-
10-26-09 11:19 PM #34
-
10-27-09 02:06 AM #35
This guy is amaizing. there is no better capper than him. Let us wait for today. He is Like Oracle
Reply With Quote
