[yisman]

MLB

Angels x8 / Yankees x2
over x2 / under
Tampa Bay x2 / Baltimore
over / under x3
Texas RL x6 ML x3
under
San Francisco x2
under x2
Dodgers ML x2 RL x2 / Pittsburgh x2
over
Cincinnati x3 / Houston x2
under x4 / over
San Diego x2
under x3
St. Louis x2 / Florida
over / under
Cubs x2 / Milwaukee x3
over
Minnesota x2
under
Toronto x2 / Detroit RL x2
under / over

NFL

New England x13 / Buffalo x3
under x7
Oakland x8 / San Diego x16
over x3 / under

[yisman]

Colorado Rockies +173 35.6% San Francisco Giants -181 64.5% ML SV Over / Under AccuScore Probability OVR 7 41.5% UND 7 47.0% Run Line AccuScore Probability Colorado Rockies +1.5 52.5% San Francisco Giants -1.5 47.6%


Point Spread AccuScore Probability 481 San Diego Chargers -10 46.2% 482 Oakland Raiders +10 48.2% Over / Under AccuScore Probability OVR 42.5 46.1% UND 42.5 54.1% Money Line AccuScore Probability 481 San Diego Chargers -500 76.6% 482 Oakland Raiders +420 23.5%


add nothing from either one.

[jcygts6]

thanks alot yisman! will you be on Oakland pointspread +9.5 or CHargers -9.5?

[yisman]

probably neither one.

I don't have a good read on the game.

[hockey216]

thank you yisman

[cahustler]

any way we can update the tallys?
i would do it but dont know where yisman left off

i find it good to go against a team with overwhelming picks.

[yisman]

I will update now

[n1co35]

Originally Posted by cahustler

any way we can update the tallys?
i would do it but dont know where yisman left off

i find it good to go against a team with overwhelming picks.

so u fade the bold picks??

[cahustler]

just testing water...but if a team is a big fav, i do the +1' runs.

[cahustler]

Originally Posted by yisman

I will update now

thanks yisman..
may i ask how you play these update?

[yisman]

^^^ yeah, he fades the bold. I don't think that'll work, though

[yisman]

Originally Posted by cahustler

thanks yisman..
may i ask how you play these update?

I recommend the bolded picks.

Do you mean how I do updates? I sift through the service plays and tally them up.

[cahustler]

[quote=yisman;2239770]I recommend the bolded picks.

no i meant i guess u play the BOLD.
i guess i got lucky and won going against it
i do however pick and choose depending on the teams

appreciate the help yisman

[yisman]

terrible day.

The under should have won, though.

[cahustler]

Originally Posted by yisman

terrible day.

The under should have won, though.

yisman, consider going against..
theory is if it looks easy, it probably isnt

i only took the over tonight in ne game.
thats cuz i already had NE.

[n1co35]

wow gettin tempted to fade the bold picks.
but as u said yisman under should've won..
anyway i remember this was successful earlier with mlb.
should be only a matter of time b4 it gets back on track.

[cahustler]

Originally Posted by n1co35

wow gettin tempted to fade the bold picks.
but as u said yisman under should've won..
anyway i remember this was successful earlier with mlb.
should be only a matter of time b4 it gets back on track.

successful meaning going with the bold?
i really think fading (some) might work because majority of
the touts are losers. only a handful of good ones.
lets see how it goes...be interested to see where it takes us.

[n1co35]

yea going with the bold was successful for some time.
then it was up and down. not sure how it's been in the recent weeks though.
but we'll see in the up comin weeks.