08-10-09, 11:43 AM
|
#1
|
|
|
John Morrison NFL system
Ultimate NFL Betting System
Here’s the Ultimate NFL Betting System in detail. As long as you strictly follow my betting guidelines below, you will be winning almost all of your NFL bets.
In a nutshell, you will be betting that one team is going to win at least one game in a consecutive 3-game series if they have just lost 3 consecutive games both straight up as well as on the spread. Always bet on the spread if your team is the underdog, and always bet on the Money Line if your team is the favorite. This is a bet that you will win more than 97% of the time, and you will be betting on just about -110 in odds almost all the time!
Before I go into detail on how to make the bets, I will go over the money management system. There are only three bet values you should stick to: Bet A; Bet B; and Bet C.
Bet A = Your beginning bet. For example, your beginning bet can be $100.
Bet B = In case Bet A fails, you make bet B to make up for any loss you’ve suffered from Bet A, plus any profit you would have achieved from bet A. So, if your Bet A was $100, your Bet B can be $250.
Bet C = In case Bet B fails, you make bet C to make up for any loss you’ve suffered from Bet A plus Bet B, plus profit you would have achieved from bet A. So, if your Bet A plus Bet B was $350, your Bet C can be $650.
There is no Bet D, or E, or anything thereafter. If you lose Bet C, you lose the bet. However, do not be concerned, because losing a Bet C is something that will almost never happen. I’ll talk more about that later. Here’s the betting system:
1. Check each NFL team after they have played at least 3 games into the season and mark down any team that have lost 3 consecutive games BOTH straight up as well as on the spread.
2. For the team that just recently lost 3 consecutive games straight up as well as on the spread, make an A bet for that team in their next game.
3. If you lose bet A, make a bet B on their next game for the same team.
4. If you lose bet B, make a bet C on their next game for the same team.
Now keep this in mind: ALWAYS bet on the money line if the team you’re betting on is the favorite to win. ALWAYS bet on the spread if the team you’re betting on is the underdog. You can check to see which team is the favorite or the underdog by looking at the spread in the bet lineup. A team showing a positive number in the spread (for example, +5) means they are the underdog. A team showing a negative number in the spread (for example, -5) means they are the favorite.
If you do not understand what the point spread means, let me explain: Each game that you wager on will have a point spread. If your team has a spread of +5.5, then betting on the spread means that you can lose the game by 5 points, and you will still win the bet.
I also recommend that you buy half a point (.5) onto the point spread if your team happens to be an underdog with an exact spread of either +2.5, +3, +6.5, or +7.
One exception is that you should not make a bet for any team late during the season when it has already been eliminated from playoff qualification. As long as your team still has any kind of a playoff chance, then they’re good to go; but if they know that they aren’t going to qualify for the playoffs regardless if they win all of their remaining games, then chances are they might not put 100% into their plays, and it’s not worth it to risk your money when your team might not be playing with its best effort.
A good place to check out each team in the NFL to see which ones have lost 3 consecutive games both straight up as well as on the spread is here. Just click through each team to see their schedule as well as past results. If the "Closing Line" column as well as the "Result" column both show as losses for the team 3 consecutive games in a row, then their upcoming games will become eligible for play under the system.
Now, I want to give you an example from the 2008-09 NFL season to make sure you’re able to follow the betting method. Here are the Denver Broncos’ results during this season:
Game#
Opponent
Final Score
Spread
1
Oakland
41-14 (WON)
-3 (WON)
2
San Diego
39-38 (WON)
-1 (PUSHED)
3
New Orleans
34-32 (WON)
-5.5 (LOST)
4
Kansas City
19-33 (LOST)
-9 (LOST)
5
Tampa Bay
16-13 (WON)
-4 (LOST)
6
Jacksonville
17-24 (LOST)
-3 (LOST)
7
New England
7-41 (LOST)
+3 (LOST)
8
Miami
17-26 (LOST)
-4.5 (LOST)
9
Cleveland
34-30 (WON)
+3 (WON)
10
Atlanta
24-20 (WON)
+6.5 (WON)
11
Oakland
10-31 (LOST)
-9 (LOST)
12
New York Jets
34-17 (WON)
+8 (WON)
13
Kansas City
24-17 (WON)
-9 (LOST)
14
Carolina
10-30 (LOST)
+7.5 (LOST)
15
Buffalo
23-30 (LOST)
-6.5 (LOST)
16
San Diego
21-52 (LOST)
+7 (LOST)
Last edited by Willie Bee; 08-11-09 at 06:37 AM.
Reason: remove link
|
|
|
08-11-09, 05:45 AM
|
#2
|
|
|
Thanks
Are you THE Tan Nguyen?????????
|
|
|
08-11-09, 02:20 PM
|
#3
|
|
|
Yes, but I AM NOT John Morrison.
|
|
|
08-11-09, 03:22 PM
|
#4
|
|
|
if he was really tan nguyen why would he post for free here?
|
|
|
08-11-09, 04:57 PM
|
#5
|
|
|
Wonder how the lions did for this system. They should of covered right or else he wouldn't be releasing this. With baseball, I think the new version is good, but with all these new versions of the NBA and baseball 2.2 and s**t like that I think some people will be in for quite a loss. Kinda like how the Marlins choked on the first series of 2.2. I think sticking with the basics for NBA and MLB. NFL might be okay too. Not gonna bet too much, just a unit here and there.
Last edited by peeiempee; 08-11-09 at 11:48 PM.
Reason: mistaken tigers for lions
|
|
|
08-11-09, 08:57 PM
|
#6
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tannguyen94
Yes, but I AM NOT John Morrison.
|
No worries. Why are some people saying you are?
|
|
|
08-11-09, 11:08 PM
|
#7
|
|
|
can anyone suggest me a website where I can backtrack the lines and results of past NFL games?
cheers
|
|
|
08-11-09, 11:49 PM
|
#8
|
|
|
Covers or SBR should do it.
|
|
|
08-13-09, 01:49 PM
|
#9
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by peeiempee
Wonder how the lions did for this system. They should of covered right or else he wouldn't be releasing this. With baseball, I think the new version is good, but with all these new versions of the NBA and baseball 2.2 and s**t like that I think some people will be in for quite a loss. Kinda like how the Marlins choked on the first series of 2.2. I think sticking with the basics for NBA and MLB. NFL might be okay too. Not gonna bet too much, just a unit here and there.
|
why you think so? they indefeated
|
|
|
08-14-09, 11:44 PM
|
#10
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sportsbetwin
No worries. Why are some people saying you are?
|
There's some confusion here. Let me clear it up. Tan Nguyen is in fact the real name of the person who calls himself John Morrison. tannguyen94 is someone completely different.
|
|
|
08-15-09, 03:40 AM
|
#11
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cali
There's some confusion here. Let me clear it up. Tan Nguyen is in fact the real name of the person who calls himself John Morrison. tannguyen94 is someone completely different.
|
??? Wasn't the NFL system supposed to be exclusive? Lol yea okay!
|
|
|
08-15-09, 09:17 PM
|
#12
|
'Where will Timmy T be in 5 years?
|
Someone asked about the Lions so here goes.
week 1 Lions lost to the falcons both SU and ATS
Week 2 Lions lost to the packers both SU and ATS
Week 3 lions lost to the 49'ers both SU and ATS
Week 4 lions had their bye
week 5 lions lost to the bears both Straight up and ATS (A bet +3.5 -110) Lost -110
Week 6 Lions lost to the vikings straight up won ATS (B bet +13 -110) Bet 275 Win 250
Week 7 Lions lost to to the texas straight up but won ATS
Week 8 lions lost both to the skins
week 9 lions lost to chicago covered
Week 10 Lions lost to jacksonville both SU and ATS
Week 11 Lions lost to carolina but covered
week 12 Lions lost to to tampa bay both SU and ATS
week 13 Lions lost to to tennesee both SU and ATS
week 14 lions lost to the vikings but covered
week 15 Lions lost to the colts but covered
week 16 Lions lost to the the saints both SU and ATS
week 18 lions lost to the pack but covered.
So the only bet you would have had was week 5 and 6 and the lions were probably outta the playoff by then
|
|
|
08-15-09, 10:53 PM
|
#13
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cali
There's some confusion here. Let me clear it up. Tan Nguyen is in fact the real name of the person who calls himself John Morrison. tannguyen94 is someone completely different.
|
Thank you so much. Finally someone clarify for me. I have a lot problem with this. Maybe I have to change my forum name.
|
|
|
08-15-09, 11:17 PM
|
#14
|
|
|
Lets clear the Record on JM..............The only person whom really knows his true indeinty is James Mcknight from E-bay fame.
What is funny there have been numerous folks whom have staked the claim on the orignal East vs West NBA System............
The best part of that system and or any of the systems that Jm re packages and re-sells is that if you play them with the correct money mangement in place YOU DONT HAVE TO BUY POINTS AT ALL.................
The upcoming NFL system was for sure ripped off as Tod from PSIC was the orignator of that in a rawer form sort of speaking.
At the end of the day Does anybody really care at all ???? A win is a win..........I will take it anyway I can $$$$$$$$$$
|
|
|
08-16-09, 08:33 AM
|
#15
|
|
|
Thanks
|
SBR Founder
Join Date:
8/11/2005
5000pts
SBR POKER ROYAL FLUSH WINNER 2/23/2011
|
08-17-09, 03:11 AM
|
#16
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by paw
Lets clear the Record on JM..............The only person whom really knows his true indeinty is James Mcknight from E-bay fame.
What is funny there have been numerous folks whom have staked the claim on the orignal East vs West NBA System............
The best part of that system and or any of the systems that Jm re packages and re-sells is that if you play them with the correct money mangement in place YOU DONT HAVE TO BUY POINTS AT ALL.................
The upcoming NFL system was for sure ripped off as Tod from PSIC was the orignator of that in a rawer form sort of speaking.
At the end of the day Does anybody really care at all ???? A win is a win..........I will take it anyway I can $$$$$$$$$$
|
...and what is correct money management? Pls explain. 
|
|
|
08-17-09, 03:15 AM
|
#17
|
|
|
Any plays coming up?
|
|
|
08-17-09, 09:21 AM
|
#18
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kengarou
Any plays coming up?
|
Today take the Chicago Cubs money line
|
|
|
08-17-09, 11:29 PM
|
#19
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by litla01
...and what is correct money management? Pls explain. 
|
You gotta know how to manage your bankroll.
What is your target?
What is your total risk?
Is this proportionate to my bankroll?
the system works but plenty fail because they have no plan.
|
|
|
08-18-09, 06:47 AM
|
#20
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by litla01
...and what is correct money management? Pls explain. 
|
I bet so that i win 1 % of my BR in the A-bet and if that lose will I chase that cost + the 1 % in B-bet and dito in the c-bet
Works well for me...
If you follow my example then you can lose 3-5 c-bets without going broke (how many you can lose depends on the odds in the games)
|
|
|
08-18-09, 07:26 AM
|
#21
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by masticore
I bet so that i win 1 % of my BR in the A-bet and if that lose will I chase that cost + the 1 % in B-bet and dito in the c-bet
Works well for me...
If you follow my example then you can lose 3-5 c-bets without going broke (how many you can lose depends on the odds in the games)
|
Ok, thanks!
I bet to win 2,5 % of bankroll and I always splitt the C-bet in 4 parts (I bet to win 2 parts (50%) with the C-bet and move the two remaining parts to the two upcomming games).
Cheers
|
|
|
08-22-09, 03:30 PM
|
#22
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rm18
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rm18
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rm18
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rm18
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rm18
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rm18
|
Hope you get a real nice t-shirt.
|
|
|
08-22-09, 03:31 PM
|
#23
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skalatharx
whats so fvkn great about post whoring anyway?? get a damn life
|
Well now you can buy stuff with em.
|
|
|
08-23-09, 12:54 PM
|
#24
|
|
|
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news. I just backtested the JM Ultimate NFL for the past 10 years check the results below.Not so Ultimate! Being a JM fan though, I'll still use all his other systems! With 1 or 2 losses it completely wipes out your bankroll.
2008
A bet=6
B bet=5
C bet=1
Total= 12 Plays
2007
A bet=5
B bet=4
C bet=5
Total=14 Plays
2006
A bet=13
B bet=5
C bet=1
Total=19 Plays
2005
A bet=14
B bet=3
C bet=0
LOSS=1
Total=18 Plays
2004
A bet=7
B bet=6
C bet=3
LOSS=2
Total=18 Plays
2003
A bet=12
B bet=2
C bet=0
LOSS=2
Total=16 Plays
2002
A bet=5
B bet=6
C bet=2
LOSS=1
Total=14 Plays
2001
A bet=8
B bet=6
C bet=1
Total=15 Plays
2000
A bet=11
B bet=2
C bet=5
LOSS=1
Total=19 Plays
1999
A bet=12
B bet=3
C bet=3
LOSS=3
Total=21 Plays
1998
A bet=7
B bet=4
C bet=0
LOSS=3
Total=14 Plays
|
|
|
09-13-09, 02:25 AM
|
#25
|
|
|
can you give game/date of the losses?
Last edited by Nino7; 09-13-09 at 02:56 AM.
|
|
|
09-13-09, 08:43 AM
|
#26
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nino7
can you give game/date of the losses?
|
would like to see as well 
|
|
|
09-13-09, 09:07 AM
|
#27
|
|
|
So what are the Morrison plays for today?
|
175 pts
3-QUESTION SBR TRIVIA WINNER 02/02/2012
1599pts
TOP SPORTSBOOK
WINNER
01/11/2011
|
09-13-09, 10:24 AM
|
#28
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordVodka
So what are the Morrison plays for today?
|
ReaD the first page...

|
|
|
09-15-09, 05:51 PM
|
#29
|
|
|
Ok, thought it might be useful to track this system this year and see how it does. Here are the teams with a loss SU and ATS (using Bodog's final lines) in Week 1:
Miami
KC
Carolina
Cincy
Cleveland
Houston
Detroit
TB
Arizona
Stl
Chicago
I'll update next Tuesday with teams who are still on the list with 2 game streaks as well as teams that are on new 1 game streaks. Remember, no plays until a team is on a 3 game streak SU and ATS.
|
|
|
09-16-09, 12:27 AM
|
#30
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jasonal_98
Ok, thought it might be useful to track this system this year and see how it does. Here are the teams with a loss SU and ATS (using Bodog's final lines) in Week 1:
Miami
KC
Carolina
Cincy
Cleveland
Houston
Detroit
TB
Arizona
Stl
Chicago
I'll update next Tuesday with teams who are still on the list with 2 game streaks as well as teams that are on new 1 game streaks. Remember, no plays until a team is on a 3 game streak SU and ATS.
|
thanks! 
|
|
|
09-16-09, 02:42 AM
|
#31
|
|
|
I don't like the whole "the loser is bound to win sometime" theory in NFL. MLB and NBA, maybe, since scores are flying around and things are harder to control. But in football, it's harder to come up with multiple unearned scores, subsequently, the shittier team loses to better teams. Maybe if you go ATS, but vegas isn't stupid, they usually keep it around +14.5 points for Lion-esque teams. I think this would be better applied to prop bets. Bet quarters or yards, individual breakouts are more likely than team breakouts. And with the Morrison NFL 65% win rate, I think they should be looking for a better system.
|
|
|
09-16-09, 03:19 AM
|
#32
|
|
|
hmmm will be on the watch for this. see how it will do.
|
|
|
09-19-09, 08:59 PM
|
#33
|
37-20-3 ATS in BTP '11 +18.8u
|
Past Results
2008
Bet A : 7-7(CIN-2, DEN, GB, OAK-2, WSH)
Bet B : 6-1(BUF, DET, GB, JAX, STL-2)
Bet C : 1-0(SF)
2007
Bet A : 6-9(DEN, HOU, OAK, STL, SD, TEN)
Bet B : 4-5(DET, KC, NO, STL)
Bet C : 5-0(ATL, BLT, CAR, NYJ, SF)
2006
Bet A : 15-7(AZ-2, BUF, CIN, DET, GB, HOU, KC, NYG, PHI, PIT-2, TB-2, WSH)
Bet B : 7-0(ATL, CAR, DEN, DET, MIA, MIN, OAK)
Bet C : 0-0
2005
Bet A : 13-3(AZ-2, BUF, CLE, DET, GB, HOU, MIA-2, PIT, STL, SF-2, WSH)
Bet B : 3-0(NYJ, PHI, TEN)
Bet C : 0-0
2004
Bet A : 10-10(CHI, CIN, DAL-2, DET, KC, NO, SEA, TEN)
Bet B : 5-5(AZ, GB, KC, TB, WSH)
Bet C : 3-2(OAK, SF, TEN)
Losses : 2(CLE, NYG)
2003
Bet A : 14-3(AZ, CAR, CHI, CLE-2, DEN, HOU, JAX-2, NYG, NYJ, SD, TB, WSH)
Bet B : 1-2(MN)
Bet C : 1-1(OAK)
Losses : 2(ATL, NYG)
2002
Bet A : 9-9(CAR, CIN, DEN, HOU, IND, MIA, MN, STL, WSH)
Bet B : 6-3(CIN, JAX, NE, NYJ, OAK, TEN)
Bet C : 2-1(CHI, STL)
Losses : 1(AZ)
2001
Bet A : 10-6(AZ, ATL, CAR, CIN, DET, IND, JAX, NYG, OAK, TEN)
Bet B : 4-2(BUF, CLE, KC, WSH)
Bet C : 1-1(IND)
Losses : 1(SD)
2000
Bet A : 8-7(AZ, ATL, BUF, CHI, DAL, IND, STL, SF)
Bet B : 1-6(TB)
Bet C : 5-1(AZ, JAX, KC, SD, SEA)
Losses : 1(CLE)
1999
Bet A : 10-7(ATL-2, CIN, GB, KC, MIA, NE, NOR, NYG, NYJ)
Bet B : 2-5(CLE, SEA)
Bet C : 3-2(CIN, NOR, SD)
Losses : 2(PIT, SF)
|
|
|
09-19-09, 09:10 PM
|
#34
|
I'm definitely fade material in NFL..
|
so what bets we got goin for this year? 
|
|
|
09-19-09, 09:38 PM
|
#35
|
|
|
We won't have any until Week 4 at the earliest.
|
|
|
|
|