[atlplayer]

Has anyone played the john morrison football system?

Today's play is Florida Marlins [A].

[slobrokk]

Is the Florida Marlins a system play A bet for MLB 3.0 ??

[ryan1]

it must be because its not a normal system play

[atlplayer]

It is an official system play, not a V 3.0 play.

[doubledime]

What is a V 3.0 play?

[atlplayer]

The addition to this new v3.0 system is that you want to make a wager for the team that previously did the sweep (NOT the team that was swept previously!) if the following 2 criteria are met:
1. The team that they swept previously came back and beat them on the very first game of theirrematch series.
2. They have an RPI of at least .025 or higher than their opponent.
If your bet loses, you would go on and make a [b] bet for the same team the next day. Most of the v3.0 bets will involve betting on a 2-game series. However, In some rare cases you can also make a [C] bet if both your [A] and [b] bet lose, and the series rematch is a 4-game series allowing you an extra final game to make a [C] wager.
Remember, the same betting rules apply: Always bet on the money line if the team you’re betting on is the favorite to win. Always bet on the run line (+1.5 runs) if the team you’re betting on is the underdog. You can check to see which team is the favorite or the underdog by looking at the run line in the bet lineup. A team showing a +1.5 in the run line means they are the underdog. A team showing a -1.5 in the run line means they are the favorite.

[Joe Sharp]

Marlins are a NON-OFFICIAL Play !!

Philadelphia RPI .513
Florida RPI .498
Difference = .015

Why would you wager on a team that just got swept by the nationals anyway?

Blanton/Nolasco = OVER 9

[peeiempee]

Bound to rebound

[Joe Sharp]

That's exactly what a square would say.

[peeiempee]

Square, circle, triangle, oval...don't matter, marlins will 1 out of 3 +1.5 as underdog or straight up as favorite. Want to put a wager on it? Whoever loses don't post on SBR for 3 months. That would mean you guys don't get rated if PTJ don't post cause I'm the one PMing G-men the plays. But I don't care, I been only playing rated lately anyways. Let's do this. Now what does the SHARP say?

[Nickelicious]

Originally Posted by Joe Sharp

Marlins are a NON-OFFICIAL Play !!

Philadelphia RPI .513
Florida RPI .498
Difference = .015

Why would you wager on a team that just got swept by the nationals anyway?

Blanton/Nolasco = OVER 9

Believe it or not, the v3.0 update changed the v1.0 system RPI filter from .010 to .015, expanding the range of official bets. Florida is an official play now according to the new criteria of the JM MLB system.

[Sforz]

Originally Posted by Nickelicious

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Sharp
Marlins are a NON-OFFICIAL Play !!

Philadelphia RPI .513
Florida RPI .498
Difference = .015

Why would you wager on a team that just got swept by the nationals anyway?

Blanton/Nolasco = OVER 9

Believe it or not, the v3.0 update changed the v1.0 system RPI filter from .010 to .015, expanding the range of official bets. Florida is an official play now according to the new criteria of the JM MLB system.

show me where he says that.

[Nickelicious]

Originally Posted by Sforz

show me where he says that.

I can put this quote in from the v3.0 PDF, which updates the v1.0 system:

System UPDATE:
I want to introduce you to the Relative Power Index (RPI). Each team in the MLB is
rated by an RPI score - the higher the score, the better the team. The RPI is calculated using the team's winning percentage with consideration of the quality of their opponents / strength of their schedule. Luckily, the RPI is calculated for you and kept up-to-date at all time. You can check for each team's RPI score at:

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/stats/rpi

The enhanced filters that you should use which will eliminate almost all losses is to

1. Pass on any series where the team you’re supposed to wager on has an RPI value that's more than .015 lower than our opponent's.

2. Pass on any series where the team you’re supposed to wager on is playing against a team who’s within the top 2 highest ranked RPI teams.

He repeats the same information about the .015 RPI spread in the v2.0 criteria before explaining his new v3.0 system with the .025 RPI filter.

[doubledime]

Originally Posted by atlplayer

The addition to this new v3.0 system is that you want to make a wager for the team that previously did the sweep (NOT the team that was swept previously!) if the following 2 criteria are met:
1. The team that they swept previously came back and beat them on the very first game of theirrematch series.
2. They have an RPI of at least .025 or higher than their opponent.
If your bet loses, you would go on and make a [b] bet for the same team the next day. Most of the v3.0 bets will involve betting on a 2-game series. However, In some rare cases you can also make a [C] bet if both your [A] and [b] bet lose, and the series rematch is a 4-game series allowing you an extra final game to make a [C] wager.
Remember, the same betting rules apply: Always bet on the money line if the team you’re betting on is the favorite to win. Always bet on the run line (+1.5 runs) if the team you’re betting on is the underdog. You can check to see which team is the favorite or the underdog by looking at the run line in the bet lineup. A team showing a +1.5 in the run line means they are the underdog. A team showing a -1.5 in the run line means they are the favorite.

Thanks

[Cyril]

So Florida is official play. But why he didn't specified in his mail that is official play? ..and he didn't send the link which he usually sends with the plays? hmm strange.

[BlueJays]

Because he wants a way out in case FLA will be swept again!

[pelos879]

Originally Posted by Nickelicious

I can put this quote in from the v3.0 PDF, which updates the v1.0 system:

System UPDATE:
I want to introduce you to the Relative Power Index (RPI). Each team in the MLB is
rated by an RPI score - the higher the score, the better the team. The RPI is calculated using the team's winning percentage with consideration of the quality of their opponents / strength of their schedule. Luckily, the RPI is calculated for you and kept up-to-date at all time. You can check for each team's RPI score at:

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/stats/rpi

The enhanced filters that you should use which will eliminate almost all losses is to

1. Pass on any series where the team you’re supposed to wager on has an RPI value that's more than .015 lower than our opponent's.

2. Pass on any series where the team you’re supposed to wager on is playing against a team who’s within the top 2 highest ranked RPI teams.

He repeats the same information about the .015 RPI spread in the v2.0 criteria before explaining his new v3.0 system with the .025 RPI filter.

I always thought it was .01. So Marlins are a pick, even though they suck right now.

[Sforz]

Originally Posted by Nickelicious

Believe it or not, the v3.0 update changed the v1.0 system RPI filter from .010 to .015, expanding the range of official bets. Florida is an official play now according to the new criteria of the JM MLB system.

Originally Posted by Sforz

show me where he says that.

thanks.

[Joe Sharp]

Originally Posted by peeiempee

Square, circle, triangle, oval...don't matter, marlins will 1 out of 3 +1.5 as underdog or straight up as favorite. Want to put a wager on it? Whoever loses don't post on SBR for 3 months. That would mean you guys don't get rated if PTJ don't post cause I'm the one PMing G-men the plays. But I don't care, I been only playing rated lately anyways. Let's do this. Now what does the SHARP say?

1st - Why are you getting so defensive? It wasn't an attack on you personally.

2nd - Show me where I said that Florida was going to get Swept again.

3rd - What on earth would I gain from a bet with you? I barely post on here as it is... I gain lots of knowledge reading some posts. And I try to be constructive once in a while. But for the most part this site is full of SHIT like This !!

Whose Di** is bigger than whose -

4th - I could give a shit less about PTJ MLB plays... They were very profitable in NBA - but MLB ... Not so much.

[Joe Sharp]

Sorry for the .015 post. I only have the V1.0. So, .015 would NOT qualify.

I guess JM will continuously change his criteria to get the best record possible. If those series start losing he'll just change it right back to .01.

[peeiempee]

Originally Posted by Joe Sharp

Quote:
Originally Posted by peeiempee
Square, circle, triangle, oval...don't matter, marlins will 1 out of 3 +1.5 as underdog or straight up as favorite. Want to put a wager on it? Whoever loses don't post on SBR for 3 months. That would mean you guys don't get rated if PTJ don't post cause I'm the one PMing G-men the plays. But I don't care, I been only playing rated lately anyways. Let's do this. Now what does the SHARP say?


1st - Why are you getting so defensive? It wasn't an attack on you personally.

2nd - Show me where I said that Florida was going to get Swept again.

3rd - What on earth would I gain from a bet with you? I barely post on here as it is... I gain lots of knowledge reading some posts. And I try to be constructive once in a while. But for the most part this site is full of SHIT like This !!

Whose Di** is bigger than whose -

4th - I could give a shit less about PTJ MLB plays... They were very profitable in NBA - but MLB ... Not so much.

Not getting all worked up about this like you put it. It might not have been an attack on me personally, but nevertheless it was an implied message saying calling me a square. Since this was a JM thread and you try to make it seem like you are so much better and knowledgable than the "Squares" so just wanted to see if you wanted to put a gentlemen's wager on it for fun. I think JM will get the win in the 3 game chase. By saying my comment was square in a JM thread, says that you think the whole JM play is square. But I think squares will get the win this weekend.

Well, you are not being very constructive with your seldom posts by calling someone's comment "square thinking." I agree, sometimes this forum is full of shit, like when people make a comment, and someone comes in here acting like he's so superior labeling people squares and noobs and this and that. Why don't you tell me how calling someone's comment square is being constructive. You are the one coming in here and measuring d**ks. It's like you giving your honest opinion and I say that's what an arrogant jerk would say.

Back to Rated, PTJ is NOT rated. Don't know why everyone thinks that. And if you think Rated is not profitable in MLB you are dead wrong. Since the introduction of their unit system they are up close to +60 units.

[Willie Bee]

Service Plays Forum: Post plays, discuss plays. That's it. If and when you find that you don't have access to this forum, it's because you couldn't follow the very simple format for this forum.

[Joe Sharp]

Peeiempee - I apologize for the misunderstanding.

When I made the square comment I was not segmenting JM system players... in fact I like the system. It presents great opportunities. I was simply alluding to the comment "Bound to Rebound".

Books love to hear that stuff... you can't simply bet on a team that you think "is due". But that, again, is just My Opinion.

Good Luck with the JM wager!!

Let's get back to work. No hard feelings.

[peeiempee]

True...no hard feelings. Good luck too.

[Kickz]

Originally Posted by atlplayer

The addition to this new v3.0 system is that you want to make a wager for the team that previously did the sweep (NOT the team that was swept previously!) if the following 2 criteria are met:
1. The team that they swept previously came back and beat them on the very first game of theirrematch series.
2. They have an RPI of at least .025 or higher than their opponent.
If your bet loses, you would go on and make a [b] bet for the same team the next day. Most of the v3.0 bets will involve betting on a 2-game series. However, In some rare cases you can also make a [C] bet if both your [A] and [b] bet lose, and the series rematch is a 4-game series allowing you an extra final game to make a [C] wager.
Remember, the same betting rules apply: Always bet on the money line if the team you’re betting on is the favorite to win. Always bet on the run line (+1.5 runs) if the team you’re betting on is the underdog. You can check to see which team is the favorite or the underdog by looking at the run line in the bet lineup. A team showing a +1.5 in the run line means they are the underdog. A team showing a -1.5 in the run line means they are the favorite.

For MLB v3.0 system, does the 1st game of the rematch have to be a "come from behind win" by the team that was swept previously?
Maybe I misunderstood. thank you for the post.

[Bakerdew]

"Let's not argue and bicker over 'oo killed 'oo this is supposed to be a happy occasion"

[Nickelicious]

Originally Posted by Willie Bee

Service Plays Forum: Post plays, discuss plays. That's it. If and when you find that you don't have access to this forum, it's because you couldn't follow the very simple format for this forum.

Willie, just askin': Is that really the deal on the Service Plays Forum? Just to post the plays? No bickering about JM or Ferringo or Golden or whoever? Meself, I don't see the big deal as long as the thread starts off with the tout plays. In fact, I kinda like to see the debate, tho I do frown upon it when it gets personal.

Just wondering.

[Willie Bee]

Originally Posted by nickelicious

in fact, i kinda like to see the debate, tho i do frown upon it when it gets personal.

Bingo!