[yisman]

Washington x6 / Pittsburgh x6
under x3
Minnesota x5 / Angels x4
over x7
Detroit x16 (3 are RL) / Cleveland x3
under
Atlanta x4 (1 is RL) / Dodgers x4
over
San Diego x4 / Milwaukee x5
over
Toronto x6 / Oakland x2
over x2 / under x2
Tampa Bay RL x10 ML x1 / Kansas City x2
under / over
Texas x6 (2 are RL)
under x5 / over
Cubs x15 / Florida x2
under x3
Boston x14 / Baltimore x6
under / over
Yankees x7 / White Sox x5*
under x3 / over
St. Louis x8 (2 are RL) / Houston
under / over
Colorado x15 (2 are RL)
over x2 / under
Phillies RL x3
over / under
Mets x12 (1 is RL) / Arizona
under x4 / over


*- That was with Richard, who has been dealt.

[yisman]

Robbie Gainous: "We are getting solid value with the host as they are the better team and installed as an underdog, take Pittsburgh on Friday night."

Really? Explain how Pittsburgh is better than anyone. They've traded away basically all their major leaguers.

Pittsburgh is the worst team in baseball.

[yisman]

bump

[Nickelicious]

This is due for an update from our glorious consensus builders.

[peeiempee]

The consesus bold are extactly what I was thinking, minus Tampa, i never go against system plays. Great job Yis

[yisman]

Plays:

Colorado
Cubs
Mets
Tampa Bay RL
Detroit
Minnesota/Angels OVER
Texas
St. Louis

in order

Best of luck

If we can't find historical numbers for RLs, I'll ask in the think tank.

Biff has agreed to post for tomorrow.

[Nickelicious]

I'm on every one of 'em and parlayed two sub-sets of 4 (bumping to RL on a couple):

Mets, Cubs, Det, and TB RL.
Met RL, Det, TB RL and Tex RL

Both pay roughly 16 to 1. Go Mets, Tigers and Rays!

[peeiempee]

I did some research way back and it comes out to about 65% of the time, when a team wins, they win by more than 1

[dvb02]

Yisman, once again, thanks!!!!

[youngfan98]

Thank a bunch Yman

[InTheHole]

[Nickelicious]

5-3, good enough to make money, but not good enough to cash in any parlays. But the huge JM play winner in StL made me a solid profit overall.

[BettorBob]

Another profitable day for yisman (but not for me, since I loaded up on Fazzini's big Cubs play ) Oh well, the guy was due to lose I guess.



2009-07-31,Mets,100,2-3,L,$2594
2009-07-31,Rockies,-160,5-3,W,$2694
2009-07-31,Cardinals,-174,4-3,W,$2594
2009-07-31,Cubs,-131,2-5,L,$2494
2009-07-31,Rangers,-159,5-4,W,$2625
2009-07-31,Rays,-270,8-2,W,$2525
2009-07-31,Tigers,-164,5-6,L,$2425
2009-07-31,Angels/Twins OVER 10,-110,11-5,W,$2589
2009-07-30,Cubs,-180,12-3,W,$2489
2009-07-30,Brewers,-285,7-3,W,$2389
2009-07-30,RedSox,-386,8-5,W,$2289
2009-07-30,Rangers,-168,7-1,W,$2189
2009-07-30,Mets,-138,7-0,W,$2089
2009-07-29,Marlins,-153,6-3,W,$1989
2009-07-29,Phillies,-159,0-4,L,$1889
2009-07-29,Rangers/Tigers UNDER 8.5,-116,13-5,L,$2048
2009-07-29,Giants,-163,1-0,W,$2164
2009-07-29,Cubs,-185,12-0,W,$2064
2009-07-28,Mariners,-122,4-3,W,$1964
2009-07-28,Braves/Marlins UNDER 7.5,-105,3-4,W,$1864
2009-07-28,RedSox,-226,8-9,L,$1764
2009-07-28,Yankees,-138,2-6,L,$1990
2009-07-27,Giants,-230,4-2,W,$2128
2009-07-27,RedSox,-325,8-3,W,$2028
2009-07-27,Rangers/Tigers UNDER 9.5,-116,5-2,W,$1928
2009-07-27,Rangers,-153,5-2,W,$1828
2009-07-27,Cubs,-158,5-1,W,$1728
2009-07-27,Angels/Indians OVER 10,-113,8-6,W,$1628
2009-07-27,WhiteSox/Twins OVER 9.5,100,4-3,L,$1528
2009-07-27,Phillies,-112,6-2,W,$1628
2009-07-27,Yankees,-103,11-4,W,$1528
2009-07-27,Rockies,-154,3-7,L,$1428
2009-07-27,BlueJays/Mariners UNDER 7.5,-141,11-4,L,$1582
2009-07-26,Nationals,-154,3-2,W,$1723
2009-07-26,Cubs,-225,5-2,W,$1623
2009-07-26,RedSox,-176,2-6,L,$1523
2009-07-26,Rays/BlueJays UNDER 8.5,-108,5-1,W,$1699
2009-07-26,Rays,-107,1-5,L,$1599
2009-07-26,Angels,-140,1-10,L,$1706
2009-07-26,Rangers,-144,7-2,W,$1846
2009-07-26,Astros,-151,3-8,L,$1746
2009-07-24,Braves,-118,9-4,W,$1897
2009-07-24,Rangers,132,2-0,W,$1797
2009-07-24,Angels,-145,6-3,W,$1665
2009-07-23,Phillies,-300,9-4,W,$1565
2009-07-23,Diamondbacks/Pirates UNDER 7.5,100,11-4,L,$1465
2009-07-23,Yankees,-270,6-3,W,$1565
2009-07-23,Angels,-143,6-5,W,$1465
2009-07-23,Cardinals,-174,4-1,W,$1365
2009-07-23,WhiteSox,-113,5-0,W,$1265
2009-07-23,Mariners/Tigers UNDER 9,-118,2-1,W,$1165
2009-07-23,Tigers,-120,1-2,L,$1065
2009-07-22,Mariners,-135,2-1,W,$1185
2009-07-22,Giants/Braves UNDER 7,-109,4-2,W,$1085
2009-07-22,Giants,101,2-4,L,$985
2009-07-22,Cardinals/Astros UNDER 7.5,-126,4-3,W,$1085
2009-07-22,RedSox,-150,1-3,L,$985
2009-07-22,Marlins,-144,5-0,W,$1135
2009-07-21,Brewers,-137,2-0,W,$1035
2009-07-21,Dodgers,-201,12-3,W,$935
2009-07-21,Angels,-123,10-2,W,$835
2009-07-21,Angels,-130,8-5,W,$735
2009-07-21,RedSox,-169,2-4,L,$635
2009-07-21,Phillies,-126,4-1,W,$804
2009-07-20,WhiteSox,-101,4-3,W,$704
2009-07-20,Rockies,-148,10-6,W,$604
2009-07-20,Twins/Athletics UNDER 8,-120,14-13,L,$504
2009-07-19,Giants/Pirates UNDER 7.5,-120,4-3,W,$624
2009-07-19,Mariners,-111,5-3,W,$524
2009-07-19,Phillies,-126,5-0,W,$424
2009-07-17,Rays,-145,8-7,W,$324
2009-07-17,Twins/Rangers UNDER 10.5,100,5-3,W,$224
2009-07-17,Rockies,-147,5-3,W,$124
2009-07-16,Rockies,-125,10-1,W,$24
2009-07-12,Giants,-127,4-10,L,$-76
2009-07-12,Tigers,-197,10-1,W,$51
2009-07-12,Marlins,-117,8-1,W,$-49
2009-07-10,Marlins/Diamondbacks UNDER 7.5,-110,8-0,L,$-149
2009-07-10,Dodgers,-130,12-8,W,$-39
2009-07-09,Dodgers,-156,11-2,W,$-139
2009-07-07,Twins,120,2-10,L,$-239
2009-07-06,Mariners,-110,5-0,W,$-139
2009-07-06,Tigers,-143,3-4,L,$-239
2009-07-03,Cardinals,-116,7-4,W,$-96
2009-07-02,WhiteSox,-132,4-1,W,$-196
2009-07-02,Cubs,-144,9-5,W,$-296
2009-07-01,WhiteSox,114,6-2,W,$-396
2009-06-30,Mariners/Yankees UNDER 9.5,-121,8-5,L,$-510
2009-06-24,Pirates,-120,10-6,W,$-389
2009-06-22,Cardinals,-111,4-6,L,$-489
2009-06-21,Rangers,-139,2-3,L,$-378
2009-06-21,Brewers/Tigers UNDER 8,-119,3-2,W,$-239
2009-06-21,Twins,-113,1-4,L,$-339
2009-06-19,Athletics,-130,7-5,W,$-226
2009-06-19,BlueJays,-102,1-2,L,$-326
2009-06-19,WhiteSox,105,3-4,L,$-224
2009-06-15,Angels,-125,9-7,W,$-124
2009-06-10,Cubs,-122,7-1,W,$-224
2009-06-08,Cardinals,-127,2-5,L,$-324
2009-06-08,Rangers/BlueJays UNDER 10.5,-104,6-3,W,$-197
2009-06-03,Braves,-130,2-3,L,$-297
2009-06-02,Giants,-146,6-10,L,$-167
2009-05-26,Astros,-113,4-6,L,$-21
2009-05-26,Twins,-112,5-2,W,$92
2009-05-25,Tigers,-136,13-1,W,$-8
2009-05-25,Diamondbacks,-140,7-9,L,$-108
2009-05-24,Tigers,-152,1-3,L,$32
2009-05-24,Brewers/Twins OVER 9.5,-120,6-3,L,$184
2009-05-22,Phillies/Yankees OVER 11,-126,7-3,L,$304
2009-05-22,Twins,-138,11-3,W,$430
2009-05-22,WhiteSox,-130,2-0,W,$330
2009-05-21,Giants,-134,2-3,L,$230
2009-05-20,Giants,130,1-2,L,$364
2009-05-19,Pirates/Nationals OVER 10,107,8-5,W,$464
2009-05-19,Athletics/Rays OVER 9.5,-115,4-1,L,$357
2009-05-19,Cubs,-122,0-3,L,$472
2009-05-19,Dodgers,-145,5-3,W,$594
2009-05-17,Orioles,-104,4-7,L,$494
2009-05-15,Indians/Rays OVER 10.5,-107,8-7,W,$598
2009-05-14,Mets,-130,7-4,W,$498
2009-05-11,Indians/WhiteSox OVER 9.5,-104,9-4,W,$398
2009-05-11,Giants,-150,11-7,W,$298
2009-05-10,Giants,-126,7-5,W,$198
2009-05-08,BlueJays,-110,3-5,L,$98
2009-05-08,Marlins,100,8-3,W,$208
2009-05-08,Royals,-110,1-4,L,$108
2009-05-07,Cubs/Astros OVER 10,-126,8-5,W,$218
2009-05-07,Cubs,-141,8-5,W,$118
2009-05-07,Phillies,111,5-7,L,$18
2009-05-06,Twins,-112,1-4,L,$118
2009-05-05,Dodgers,-118,3-1,W,$230
2009-05-05,Cardinals,-140,7-10,L,$130
2009-05-04,Angels,-114,5-2,W,$270
2009-05-04,Rangers/Mariners UNDER 7.5,-115,6-5,L,$170
2009-05-04,Braves,-116,4-6,L,$285
2009-05-02,Rangers,-128,9-6,W,$401
2009-05-02,Mariners,-135,2-3,L,$301
2009-05-01,Brewers,-143,2-5,L,$436
2009-05-01,WhiteSox,-111,4-3,W,$579
2009-05-01,Padres,121,0-1,L,$479
2009-05-01,Giants,-108,3-2,W,$579
2009-04-30,Cardinals,-112,9-4,W,$479
2009-04-30,Brewers,-105,4-1,W,$379
2009-04-30,Dodgers,-144,8-5,W,$279
2009-04-30,RedSox,-105,0-13,L,$179
2009-04-29,Giants,-143,9-4,W,$284
2009-04-29,Cardinals,107,5-3,W,$184
2009-04-29,Pirates,183,0-1,L,$77
2009-04-28,Cardinals,-106,1-2,L,$177
2009-04-26,BlueJays,-147,4-3,W,$283
2009-04-24,RedSox,-141,5-4,W,$183
2009-04-24,Rangers/Orioles OVER 11,-114,5-4,L,$83
2009-04-24,Giants,-125,5-1,W,$197
2009-04-23,WhiteSox,-107,2-6,L,$97
2009-04-23,Rays/Mariners UNDER 7.5,-110,1-0,W,$204
2009-04-23,Dodgers,-128,2-0,W,$104
2009-04-23,Cardinals,-135,12-8,W,$4
2009-04-22,Cardinals,-101,5-2,W,$-96
2009-04-21,Marlins,-138,2-3,L,$-196
2009-04-20,Astros,-122,3-4,L,$-58
2009-04-20,Marlins,-128,0-8,L,$64
2009-04-20,Rockies,-101,3-6,L,$192
2009-04-19,Pirates,-105,1-11,L,$293
2009-04-19,Orioles/RedSox OVER 10,106,2-1,L,$398
2009-04-19,Indians/Yankees OVER 10.5,-124,7-3,L,$498
2009-04-17,Astros,-147,1-2,L,$622
2009-04-17,Marlins,-125,3-2,W,$769
2009-04-17,Padres,156,8-7,W,$669
2009-04-16,Phillies,-128,2-8,L,$513
2009-04-16,BlueJays,-133,9-2,W,$641
2009-04-15,Reds,125,3-9,L,$541
2009-04-15,Yankees,-108,4-3,W,$641
2009-04-14,Cardinals,-127,6-7,L,$541
2009-04-14,Royals,-136,9-3,W,$668
2009-04-14,Yankees,110,7-2,W,$568
2009-04-12,Rangers,107,4-6,L,$458
2009-04-11,Cubs,-128,6-5,W,$558
2009-04-11,BlueJays,-115,5-4,W,$458
2009-04-10,Indians/BlueJays OVER 9,-112,13-7,W,$358
2009-04-10,Dodgers/Diamondbacks OVER 10,-128,9-4,W,$258
2009-04-10,Angels,-107,6-3,W,$158
2009-04-10,Rangers/Tigers OVER 10.5,-115,15-2,W,$58
2009-04-08,Reds,-118,7-9,L,$-42
2009-04-07,Rockies/Diamondbacks UNDER 9,-117,3-0,W,$76
2009-04-06,Angels,-138,3-0,W,$-24
2009-04-05,Phillies,-124,1-4,L,$-124

[curious]

Originally Posted by BettorBob

Another profitable day for yisman (but not for me, since I loaded up on Fazzini's big Cubs play ) Oh well, the guy was due to lose I guess.

Hey BettorBob, how much work would it be for you to run your numbers using a weighted bet size where the bet size in units = the number of cappers on the play in the consensus list? The unit size can be $100, risking money on dogs, to win money on favs.

For example Minnesota / Angels OVER was shown as over x7, so the bet on that would be to win 7 units ($700).

I'm thinking that there might be a correlation between the number of handicappers on a play and the probability of success of the play.

[BettorBob]

Originally Posted by curious

Hey BettorBob, how much work would it be for you to run your numbers using a weighted bet size where the bet size in units = the number of cappers on the play in the consensus list? The unit size can be $100, risking money on dogs, to win money on favs.

For example Minnesota / Angels OVER was shown as over x7, so the bet on that would be to win 7 units ($700).

I'm thinking that there might be a correlation between the number of handicappers on a play and the probability of success of the play.

That's a good idea... if I have some time this weekend I'll run through it and see what happens.

[peeiempee]

Good idea curious, thanks in advance bob. I'll be interested in finding that out too.

[BettorBob]

Okay, here are the results with weighting (obviously this increases the size of each bet by at least 3x, and occasionally by 20x or more). I'll keep using the weighting in my daily posts from now on.




DATE,PICK,UNITS,ODDS,SCORE,RESULT,BANKRO LL
2009-07-31,Mets,12,100,2-3,L,$24293
2009-07-31,Rockies,15,-160,5-3,W,$25493
2009-07-31,Cardinals,8,-174,4-3,W,$23993
2009-07-31,Cubs,15,-131,2-5,L,$23193
2009-07-31,Rangers,6,-159,5-4,W,$25158
2009-07-31,Rays,11,-270,8-2,W,$24558
2009-07-31,Tigers,16,-164,5-6,L,$23458
2009-07-31,Angels/Twins OVER 10,7,-110,11-5,W,$26082
2009-07-30,Cubs,6,-180,12-3,W,$25382
2009-07-30,Brewers,10,-285,7-3,W,$24782
2009-07-30,RedSox,5,-386,8-5,W,$23782
2009-07-30,Rangers,8,-168,7-1,W,$23282
2009-07-30,Mets,8,-138,7-0,W,$22482
2009-07-29,Marlins,15,-153,6-3,W,$21682
2009-07-29,Phillies,18,-159,0-4,L,$20182
2009-07-29,Rangers/Tigers UNDER 8.5,12,-116,13-5,L,$23044
2009-07-29,Giants,11,-163,1-0,W,$24436
2009-07-29,Cubs,5,-185,12-0,W,$23336
2009-07-28,Mariners,14,-122,4-3,W,$22836
2009-07-28,Braves/Marlins UNDER 7.5,7,-105,3-4,W,$21436
2009-07-28,RedSox,8,-226,8-9,L,$20736
2009-07-28,Yankees,19,-138,2-6,L,$22544
2009-07-27,Giants,10,-230,4-2,W,$25166
2009-07-27,RedSox,11,-325,8-3,W,$24166
2009-07-27,Rangers/Tigers UNDER 9.5,6,-116,5-2,W,$23066
2009-07-27,Rangers,12,-153,5-2,W,$22466
2009-07-27,Cubs,10,-158,5-1,W,$21266
2009-07-27,Angels/Indians OVER 10,7,-113,8-6,W,$20266
2009-07-27,WhiteSox/Twins OVER 9.5,6,100,4-3,L,$19566
2009-07-27,Phillies,16,-112,6-2,W,$20166
2009-07-27,Yankees,11,-103,11-4,W,$18566
2009-07-27,Rockies,12,-154,3-7,L,$17466
2009-07-27,BlueJays/Mariners UNDER 7.5,8,-141,11-4,L,$19314
2009-07-26,Nationals,5,-154,3-2,W,$20442
2009-07-26,Cubs,10,-225,5-2,W,$19942
2009-07-26,RedSox,8,-176,2-6,L,$18942
2009-07-26,Rays/BlueJays UNDER 8.5,8,-108,5-1,W,$20350
2009-07-26,Rays,12,-107,1-5,L,$19550
2009-07-26,Angels,17,-140,1-10,L,$20834
2009-07-26,Rangers,10,-144,7-2,W,$23214
2009-07-26,Astros,15,-151,3-8,L,$22214
2009-07-24,Braves,9,-118,9-4,W,$24479
2009-07-24,Rangers,9,132,2-0,W,$23579
2009-07-24,Angels,8,-145,6-3,W,$22391
2009-07-23,Phillies,12,-300,9-4,W,$21591
2009-07-23,Diamondbacks/Pirates UNDER 7.5,6,100,11-4,L,$20391
2009-07-23,Yankees,12,-270,6-3,W,$20991
2009-07-23,Angels,19,-143,6-5,W,$19791
2009-07-23,Cardinals,13,-174,4-1,W,$17891
2009-07-23,WhiteSox,21,-113,5-0,W,$16591
2009-07-23,Mariners/Tigers UNDER 9,5,-118,2-1,W,$14491
2009-07-23,Tigers,11,-120,1-2,L,$13991
2009-07-22,Mariners,24,-135,2-1,W,$15311
2009-07-22,Giants/Braves UNDER 7,8,-109,4-2,W,$12911
2009-07-22,Giants,15,101,2-4,L,$12111
2009-07-22,Cardinals/Astros UNDER 7.5,8,-126,4-3,W,$13611
2009-07-22,RedSox,10,-150,1-3,L,$12811
2009-07-22,Marlins,11,-144,5-0,W,$14311
2009-07-21,Brewers,8,-137,2-0,W,$13211
2009-07-21,Dodgers,6,-201,12-3,W,$12411
2009-07-21,Angels,7,-123,10-2,W,$11811
2009-07-21,Angels,7,-130,8-5,W,$11111
2009-07-21,RedSox,11,-169,2-4,L,$10411
2009-07-21,Phillies,13,-126,4-1,W,$12270
2009-07-20,WhiteSox,14,-101,4-3,W,$10970
2009-07-20,Rockies,23,-148,10-6,W,$9570
2009-07-20,Twins/Athletics UNDER 8,6,-120,14-13,L,$7270
2009-07-19,Giants/Pirates UNDER 7.5,6,-120,4-3,W,$7990
2009-07-19,Mariners,13,-111,5-3,W,$7390
2009-07-19,Phillies,13,-126,5-0,W,$6090
2009-07-17,Rays,7,-145,8-7,W,$4790
2009-07-17,Twins/Rangers UNDER 10.5,8,100,5-3,W,$4090
2009-07-17,Rockies,7,-147,5-3,W,$3290
2009-07-16,Rockies,17,-125,10-1,W,$2590
2009-07-12,Giants,6,-127,4-10,L,$890
2009-07-12,Tigers,4,-197,10-1,W,$1652
2009-07-12,Marlins,11,-117,8-1,W,$1252
2009-07-10,Marlins/Diamondbacks UNDER 7.5,5,-110,8-0,L,$152
2009-07-10,Dodgers,5,-130,12-8,W,$702
2009-07-09,Dodgers,6,-156,11-2,W,$202
2009-07-07,Twins,5,120,2-10,L,$-398
2009-07-06,Mariners,4,-110,5-0,W,$102
2009-07-06,Tigers,5,-143,3-4,L,$-298
2009-07-03,Cardinals,6,-116,7-4,W,$417
2009-07-02,WhiteSox,5,-132,4-1,W,$-183
2009-07-02,Cubs,6,-144,9-5,W,$-683
2009-07-01,WhiteSox,6,114,6-2,W,$-1283
2009-06-30,Mariners/Yankees UNDER 9.5,3,-121,8-5,L,$-1967
2009-06-24,Pirates,5,-120,10-6,W,$-1604
2009-06-22,Cardinals,4,-111,4-6,L,$-2104
2009-06-21,Rangers,3,-139,2-3,L,$-1660
2009-06-21,Brewers/Tigers UNDER 8,3,-119,3-2,W,$-1243
2009-06-21,Twins,4,-113,1-4,L,$-1543
2009-06-19,Athletics,4,-130,7-5,W,$-1091
2009-06-19,BlueJays,4,-102,1-2,L,$-1491
2009-06-19,WhiteSox,4,105,3-4,L,$-1083
2009-06-15,Angels,8,-125,9-7,W,$-683
2009-06-10,Cubs,4,-122,7-1,W,$-1483
2009-06-08,Cardinals,3,-127,2-5,L,$-1883
2009-06-08,Rangers/BlueJays UNDER 10.5,3,-104,6-3,W,$-1502
2009-06-03,Braves,4,-130,2-3,L,$-1802
2009-06-02,Giants,5,-146,6-10,L,$-1282
2009-05-26,Astros,5,-113,4-6,L,$-552
2009-05-26,Twins,4,-112,5-2,W,$13
2009-05-25,Tigers,6,-136,13-1,W,$-387
2009-05-25,Diamondbacks,4,-140,7-9,L,$-987
2009-05-24,Tigers,4,-152,1-3,L,$-427
2009-05-24,Brewers/Twins OVER 9.5,4,-120,6-3,L,$181
2009-05-22,Phillies/Yankees OVER 11,4,-126,7-3,L,$661
2009-05-22,Twins,4,-138,11-3,W,$1165
2009-05-22,WhiteSox,5,-130,2-0,W,$765
2009-05-21,Giants,4,-134,2-3,L,$265
2009-05-19,Pirates/Nationals OVER 10,3,107,8-5,W,$801
2009-05-19,Athletics/Rays OVER 9.5,3,-115,4-1,L,$480
2009-05-19,Cubs,4,-122,0-3,L,$825
2009-05-19,Dodgers,4,-145,5-3,W,$1313
2009-05-17,Orioles,4,-104,4-7,L,$913
2009-05-15,Indians/Rays OVER 10.5,4,-107,8-7,W,$1329
2009-05-14,Mets,4,-130,7-4,W,$929
2009-05-11,Indians/WhiteSox OVER 9.5,3,-104,9-4,W,$529
2009-05-11,Giants,8,-150,11-7,W,$229
2009-05-10,Giants,4,-126,7-5,W,$-571
2009-05-08,BlueJays,5,-110,3-5,L,$-971
2009-05-08,Marlins,3,100,8-3,W,$-421
2009-05-08,Royals,4,-110,1-4,L,$-721
2009-05-07,Cubs/Astros OVER 10,3,-126,8-5,W,$-281
2009-05-07,Cubs,3,-141,8-5,W,$-581
2009-05-07,Phillies,6,111,5-7,L,$-881
2009-05-06,Twins,5,-112,1-4,L,$-281
2009-05-05,Dodgers,4,-118,3-1,W,$279
2009-05-05,Cardinals,8,-140,7-10,L,$-121
2009-05-04,Angels,3,-114,5-2,W,$999
2009-05-04,Rangers/Mariners UNDER 7.5,3,-115,6-5,L,$699
2009-05-04,Braves,3,-116,4-6,L,$1044
2009-05-02,Rangers,4,-128,9-6,W,$1392
2009-05-02,Mariners,6,-135,2-3,L,$992
2009-05-01,Brewers,3,-143,2-5,L,$1802
2009-05-01,WhiteSox,3,-111,4-3,W,$2231
2009-05-01,Padres,5,121,0-1,L,$1931
2009-05-01,Giants,5,-108,3-2,W,$2431
2009-04-30,Cardinals,4,-112,9-4,W,$1931
2009-04-30,Brewers,5,-105,4-1,W,$1531
2009-04-30,Dodgers,4,-144,8-5,W,$1031
2009-04-30,RedSox,5,-105,0-13,L,$631
2009-04-29,Giants,3,-143,9-4,W,$1156
2009-04-29,Cardinals,3,107,5-3,W,$856
2009-04-29,Pirates,3,183,0-1,L,$535
2009-04-28,Cardinals,6,-106,1-2,L,$835
2009-04-26,BlueJays,5,-147,4-3,W,$1471
2009-04-24,RedSox,5,-141,5-4,W,$971
2009-04-24,Rangers/Orioles OVER 11,3,-114,5-4,L,$471
2009-04-24,Giants,5,-125,5-1,W,$813
2009-04-23,WhiteSox,4,-107,2-6,L,$313
2009-04-23,Rays/Mariners UNDER 7.5,3,-110,1-0,W,$741
2009-04-23,Dodgers,5,-128,2-0,W,$441
2009-04-23,Cardinals,3,-135,12-8,W,$-59
2009-04-22,Cardinals,5,-101,5-2,W,$-359
2009-04-21,Marlins,5,-138,2-3,L,$-859
2009-04-20,Astros,4,-122,3-4,L,$-169
2009-04-20,Marlins,3,-128,0-8,L,$319
2009-04-20,Rockies,5,-101,3-6,L,$703
2009-04-19,Pirates,3,-105,1-11,L,$1208
2009-04-19,Orioles/RedSox OVER 10,3,106,2-1,L,$1523
2009-04-19,Indians/Yankees OVER 10.5,4,-124,7-3,L,$1823
2009-04-17,Astros,6,-147,1-2,L,$2319
2009-04-17,Marlins,5,-125,3-2,W,$3201
2009-04-17,Padres,6,156,8-7,W,$2701
2009-04-16,Phillies,6,-128,2-8,L,$1765
2009-04-16,BlueJays,6,-133,9-2,W,$2533
2009-04-15,Reds,3,125,3-9,L,$1933
2009-04-15,Yankees,3,-108,4-3,W,$2233
2009-04-14,Cardinals,3,-127,6-7,L,$1933
2009-04-14,Royals,6,-136,9-3,W,$2314
2009-04-14,Yankees,4,110,7-2,W,$1714
2009-04-12,Rangers,4,107,4-6,L,$1274
2009-04-11,Cubs,5,-128,6-5,W,$1674
2009-04-11,BlueJays,3,-115,5-4,W,$1174
2009-04-10,Indians/BlueJays OVER 9,2,-112,13-7,W,$874
2009-04-10,Dodgers/Diamondbacks OVER 10,2,-128,9-4,W,$674
2009-04-10,Angels,4,-107,6-3,W,$474
2009-04-10,Rangers/Tigers OVER 10.5,3,-115,15-2,W,$74
2009-04-08,Reds,3,-118,7-9,L,$-226
2009-04-07,Rockies/Diamondbacks UNDER 9,2,-117,3-0,W,$128
2009-04-06,Angels,3,-138,3-0,W,$-72
2009-04-05,Phillies,3,-124,1-4,L,$-372

[JayJay2]

BettorBob Nice work youve done there. But you need to clarify some questions for me.
The bet size is "to win 100$" per unit. and not bet 100$ as 1 unit correct?
Looking at the odds, those are all ML play?

Either way, those are impressive numbers. Starting from 0 you would end up + ~25000$ in just 185 bets.

What program are you using to make that graph? and what do you write to make the graph take these numbers? I would like to experiment a bit with applying different filters and see if I can find something

[BettorBob]

Originally Posted by JayJay2

BettorBob Nice work youve done there. But you need to clarify some questions for me.
The bet size is "to win 100$" per unit. and not bet 100$ as 1 unit correct?
Looking at the odds, those are all ML play?

Either way, those are impressive numbers. Starting from 0 you would end up + ~25000$ in just 185 bets.

What program are you using to make that graph? and what do you write to make the graph take these numbers? I would like to experiment a bit with applying different filters and see if I can find something

I'm using a $100 base wager. This means that if the odds are negative (e.g. -130) then I am risking $130 to win $100 per unit. If the odds are positive (e.g. +115) then I am risking $100 to win $115 per unit.

Right now it's all ML because covers.com doesn't have any historical RL data. Though we may be able to estimate the RL based on the ML + total. I'm gonna look into that, since it would be nice to bet the RL for any strong favorite over about -200.

For the charts, I am using the Google chart API. I wrote a perl script which crunches the numbers, figures out how much money has been won/lost on each bet, and spits out the bet list and chart URL.

[yisman]

asked about it http://forum.sbrforum.com/handicappe...-runlines.html

two replies, not great so far