[yisman]

Sorry guys. Overslept. I hate these noon starts. Not going to be up in time for the first three games, most likely. Definitely not the Mets game. Mets were a big play last night, though, and it's the same pitching matchup

Game 1: Mets x8 / Colorado
under x4
Game 2: Colorado x6 / Mets x2
under / over
Baltimore x8 (1 is RL) / Kansas City x3
under
St. Louis x6 (1 is RL) / Dodgers x3
under x3 / over x2
White Sox x14 / Yankees x14
over x3 / under x2
Texas x8 (1 is RL) / Seattle
over x4 / under x3
Phillies x14 / San Francisco x11
under x3 / over
San Diego
Florida x7 / Atlanta x9
over x5 / under x3
Boston x5 (3 are RL)
under x2 / over
Milwaukee RL x8 ML x2
Cincinnati x5 (2 are RL) / San Diego
Cubs RL x5 ML x1
over x3

[Engine]

Looking good so far...

[yisman]

3/3 in the afternoon. Wish I had a chance to do more with it.

[yisman]

Texas would be the night play.

Never seen two games as split as SF/PHI and CHW/NYY.

[tlafer]

Four for four. Not too shabby.

[dvb02]

Yisman, thanks once again for compiling all the info........we really appreciate it.

[yisman]

you're welcome.

Gotta love the Texas pick.

It wasn't a bolded play, but I also took Colorado in Game 2 partly based on this.

[InTheHole]

nice

[n1co35]

great day today! 4/4

[yisman]

I think this thread is still flying under the radar. Probably a good thing.

[n1co35]

.

[InTheHole]

I think this thread is still flying under the radar. Probably a good thing.

Unless you view it 300 times a day it is not flying under the radar. Keep up the good work.

[Bakerdew]

Yes thanks for the work

[Nickelicious]

This summary is about the only thing I play anymore, besides the JM system. Even Golden and Cash have crapped out and cost me money. As noted in the chart from yesterday's summary, over the course of time, this works. And it works really well if you ignore baseball until the NBA finals are over.

[yisman]

Unless you view it 300 times a day it is not flying under the radar. Keep up the good work.

I just mean that the regular posters on the forum have no clue what this is.

Ah, the service plays forum regulars are a different bunch.

Something did change, though. My threads used to get 120-170 views a day and never got any comments aside from my own. Now they're topping 600 regularly and getting multiple comments.

[Nickelicious]

I just mean that the regular posters on the forum have no clue what this is.

Ah, the service plays forum regulars are a different bunch.

Something did change, though. My threads used to get 120-170 views a day and never got any comments aside from my own. Now they're topping 600 regularly and getting multiple comments.

One more good reason to keep up the good work in this forum, yisman. Your hard work is appreciated (even if you do sleep in late on occasion) and you are a shooting star with the regular posters.

Why the hell this thread doesn't get 2,000 hits a day is beyond me.

[BettorBob]

Wow, 5-0! Congrats to yisman on another great day!



2009-07-30,Cubs,-180,12-3,W,$2489
2009-07-30,Brewers,-285,7-3,W,$2389
2009-07-30,RedSox,-386,8-5,W,$2289
2009-07-30,Rangers,-168,7-1,W,$2189
2009-07-30,Mets,-138,7-0,W,$2089
2009-07-29,Marlins,-153,6-3,W,$1989
2009-07-29,Phillies,-159,0-4,L,$1889
2009-07-29,Rangers/Tigers UNDER 8.5,-116,13-5,L,$2048
2009-07-29,Giants,-163,1-0,W,$2164
2009-07-29,Cubs,-185,12-0,W,$2064
2009-07-28,Mariners,-122,4-3,W,$1964
2009-07-28,Braves/Marlins UNDER 7.5,-105,3-4,W,$1864
2009-07-28,RedSox,-226,8-9,L,$1764
2009-07-28,Yankees,-138,2-6,L,$1990
2009-07-27,Giants,-230,4-2,W,$2128
2009-07-27,RedSox,-325,8-3,W,$2028
2009-07-27,Rangers/Tigers UNDER 9.5,-116,5-2,W,$1928
2009-07-27,Rangers,-153,5-2,W,$1828
2009-07-27,Cubs,-158,5-1,W,$1728
2009-07-27,Angels/Indians OVER 10,-113,8-6,W,$1628
2009-07-27,WhiteSox/Twins OVER 9.5,100,4-3,L,$1528
2009-07-27,Phillies,-112,6-2,W,$1628
2009-07-27,Yankees,-103,11-4,W,$1528
2009-07-27,Rockies,-154,3-7,L,$1428
2009-07-27,BlueJays/Mariners UNDER 7.5,-141,11-4,L,$1582
2009-07-26,Nationals,-154,3-2,W,$1723
2009-07-26,Cubs,-225,5-2,W,$1623
2009-07-26,RedSox,-176,2-6,L,$1523
2009-07-26,Rays/BlueJays UNDER 8.5,-108,5-1,W,$1699
2009-07-26,Rays,-107,1-5,L,$1599
2009-07-26,Angels,-140,1-10,L,$1706
2009-07-26,Rangers,-144,7-2,W,$1846
2009-07-26,Astros,-151,3-8,L,$1746
2009-07-24,Braves,-118,9-4,W,$1897
2009-07-24,Rangers,132,2-0,W,$1797
2009-07-24,Angels,-145,6-3,W,$1665
2009-07-23,Phillies,-300,9-4,W,$1565
2009-07-23,Diamondbacks/Pirates UNDER 7.5,100,11-4,L,$1465
2009-07-23,Yankees,-270,6-3,W,$1565
2009-07-23,Angels,-143,6-5,W,$1465
2009-07-23,Cardinals,-174,4-1,W,$1365
2009-07-23,WhiteSox,-113,5-0,W,$1265
2009-07-23,Mariners/Tigers UNDER 9,-118,2-1,W,$1165
2009-07-23,Tigers,-120,1-2,L,$1065
2009-07-22,Mariners,-135,2-1,W,$1185
2009-07-22,Giants/Braves UNDER 7,-109,4-2,W,$1085
2009-07-22,Giants,101,2-4,L,$985
2009-07-22,Cardinals/Astros UNDER 7.5,-126,4-3,W,$1085
2009-07-22,RedSox,-150,1-3,L,$985
2009-07-22,Marlins,-144,5-0,W,$1135
2009-07-21,Brewers,-137,2-0,W,$1035
2009-07-21,Dodgers,-201,12-3,W,$935
2009-07-21,Angels,-123,10-2,W,$835
2009-07-21,Angels,-130,8-5,W,$735
2009-07-21,RedSox,-169,2-4,L,$635
2009-07-21,Phillies,-126,4-1,W,$804
2009-07-20,WhiteSox,-101,4-3,W,$704
2009-07-20,Rockies,-148,10-6,W,$604
2009-07-20,Twins/Athletics UNDER 8,-120,14-13,L,$504
2009-07-19,Giants/Pirates UNDER 7.5,-120,4-3,W,$624
2009-07-19,Mariners,-111,5-3,W,$524
2009-07-19,Phillies,-126,5-0,W,$424
2009-07-17,Rays,-145,8-7,W,$324
2009-07-17,Twins/Rangers UNDER 10.5,100,5-3,W,$224
2009-07-17,Rockies,-147,5-3,W,$124
2009-07-16,Rockies,-125,10-1,W,$24
2009-07-12,Giants,-127,4-10,L,$-76
2009-07-12,Tigers,-197,10-1,W,$51
2009-07-12,Marlins,-117,8-1,W,$-49
2009-07-10,Marlins/Diamondbacks UNDER 7.5,-110,8-0,L,$-149
2009-07-10,Dodgers,-130,12-8,W,$-39
2009-07-09,Dodgers,-156,11-2,W,$-139
2009-07-07,Twins,120,2-10,L,$-239
2009-07-06,Mariners,-110,5-0,W,$-139
2009-07-06,Tigers,-143,3-4,L,$-239
2009-07-03,Cardinals,-116,7-4,W,$-96
2009-07-02,WhiteSox,-132,4-1,W,$-196
2009-07-02,Cubs,-144,9-5,W,$-296
2009-07-01,WhiteSox,114,6-2,W,$-396
2009-06-30,Mariners/Yankees UNDER 9.5,-121,8-5,L,$-510
2009-06-24,Pirates,-120,10-6,W,$-389
2009-06-22,Cardinals,-111,4-6,L,$-489
2009-06-21,Rangers,-139,2-3,L,$-378
2009-06-21,Brewers/Tigers UNDER 8,-119,3-2,W,$-239
2009-06-21,Twins,-113,1-4,L,$-339
2009-06-19,Athletics,-130,7-5,W,$-226
2009-06-19,BlueJays,-102,1-2,L,$-326
2009-06-19,WhiteSox,105,3-4,L,$-224
2009-06-15,Angels,-125,9-7,W,$-124
2009-06-10,Cubs,-122,7-1,W,$-224
2009-06-08,Cardinals,-127,2-5,L,$-324
2009-06-08,Rangers/BlueJays UNDER 10.5,-104,6-3,W,$-197
2009-06-03,Braves,-130,2-3,L,$-297
2009-06-02,Giants,-146,6-10,L,$-167
2009-05-26,Astros,-113,4-6,L,$-21
2009-05-26,Twins,-112,5-2,W,$92
2009-05-25,Tigers,-136,13-1,W,$-8
2009-05-25,Diamondbacks,-140,7-9,L,$-108
2009-05-24,Tigers,-152,1-3,L,$32
2009-05-24,Brewers/Twins OVER 9.5,-120,6-3,L,$184
2009-05-22,Phillies/Yankees OVER 11,-126,7-3,L,$304
2009-05-22,Twins,-138,11-3,W,$430
2009-05-22,WhiteSox,-130,2-0,W,$330
2009-05-21,Giants,-134,2-3,L,$230
2009-05-20,Giants,130,1-2,L,$364
2009-05-19,Pirates/Nationals OVER 10,107,8-5,W,$464
2009-05-19,Athletics/Rays OVER 9.5,-115,4-1,L,$357
2009-05-19,Cubs,-122,0-3,L,$472
2009-05-19,Dodgers,-145,5-3,W,$594
2009-05-17,Orioles,-104,4-7,L,$494
2009-05-15,Indians/Rays OVER 10.5,-107,8-7,W,$598
2009-05-14,Mets,-130,7-4,W,$498
2009-05-11,Indians/WhiteSox OVER 9.5,-104,9-4,W,$398
2009-05-11,Giants,-150,11-7,W,$298
2009-05-10,Giants,-126,7-5,W,$198
2009-05-08,BlueJays,-110,3-5,L,$98
2009-05-08,Marlins,100,8-3,W,$208
2009-05-08,Royals,-110,1-4,L,$108
2009-05-07,Cubs/Astros OVER 10,-126,8-5,W,$218
2009-05-07,Cubs,-141,8-5,W,$118
2009-05-07,Phillies,111,5-7,L,$18
2009-05-06,Twins,-112,1-4,L,$118
2009-05-05,Dodgers,-118,3-1,W,$230
2009-05-05,Cardinals,-140,7-10,L,$130
2009-05-04,Angels,-114,5-2,W,$270
2009-05-04,Rangers/Mariners UNDER 7.5,-115,6-5,L,$170
2009-05-04,Braves,-116,4-6,L,$285
2009-05-02,Rangers,-128,9-6,W,$401
2009-05-02,Mariners,-135,2-3,L,$301
2009-05-01,Brewers,-143,2-5,L,$436
2009-05-01,WhiteSox,-111,4-3,W,$579
2009-05-01,Padres,121,0-1,L,$479
2009-05-01,Giants,-108,3-2,W,$579
2009-04-30,Cardinals,-112,9-4,W,$479
2009-04-30,Brewers,-105,4-1,W,$379
2009-04-30,Dodgers,-144,8-5,W,$279
2009-04-30,RedSox,-105,0-13,L,$179
2009-04-29,Giants,-143,9-4,W,$284
2009-04-29,Cardinals,107,5-3,W,$184
2009-04-29,Pirates,183,0-1,L,$77
2009-04-28,Cardinals,-106,1-2,L,$177
2009-04-26,BlueJays,-147,4-3,W,$283
2009-04-24,RedSox,-141,5-4,W,$183
2009-04-24,Rangers/Orioles OVER 11,-114,5-4,L,$83
2009-04-24,Giants,-125,5-1,W,$197
2009-04-23,WhiteSox,-107,2-6,L,$97
2009-04-23,Rays/Mariners UNDER 7.5,-110,1-0,W,$204
2009-04-23,Dodgers,-128,2-0,W,$104
2009-04-23,Cardinals,-135,12-8,W,$4
2009-04-22,Cardinals,-101,5-2,W,$-96
2009-04-21,Marlins,-138,2-3,L,$-196
2009-04-20,Astros,-122,3-4,L,$-58
2009-04-20,Marlins,-128,0-8,L,$64
2009-04-20,Rockies,-101,3-6,L,$192
2009-04-19,Pirates,-105,1-11,L,$293
2009-04-19,Orioles/RedSox OVER 10,106,2-1,L,$398
2009-04-19,Indians/Yankees OVER 10.5,-124,7-3,L,$498
2009-04-17,Astros,-147,1-2,L,$622
2009-04-17,Marlins,-125,3-2,W,$769
2009-04-17,Padres,156,8-7,W,$669
2009-04-16,Phillies,-128,2-8,L,$513
2009-04-16,BlueJays,-133,9-2,W,$641
2009-04-15,Reds,125,3-9,L,$541
2009-04-15,Yankees,-108,4-3,W,$641
2009-04-14,Cardinals,-127,6-7,L,$541
2009-04-14,Royals,-136,9-3,W,$668
2009-04-14,Yankees,110,7-2,W,$568
2009-04-12,Rangers,107,4-6,L,$458
2009-04-11,Cubs,-128,6-5,W,$558
2009-04-11,BlueJays,-115,5-4,W,$458
2009-04-10,Indians/BlueJays OVER 9,-112,13-7,W,$358
2009-04-10,Dodgers/Diamondbacks OVER 10,-128,9-4,W,$258
2009-04-10,Angels,-107,6-3,W,$158
2009-04-10,Rangers/Tigers OVER 10.5,-115,15-2,W,$58
2009-04-08,Reds,-118,7-9,L,$-42
2009-04-07,Rockies/Diamondbacks UNDER 9,-117,3-0,W,$76
2009-04-06,Angels,-138,3-0,W,$-24
2009-04-05,Phillies,-124,1-4,L,$-124

[yisman]

Milwaukee, Cubs, and Boston were RL plays, actually. I notice you're counting everything as ML. Ah well.

In terms of risking to win 100, I think Milwaukee and Boston were - anyway, but the Cubs were +.

"Your hard work is appreciated (even if you do sleep in late on occasion) and you are a shooting star with the regular posters."

Well, the regular posters in the service plays forum, anyway.

Once again, I won't be able to do this tomorrow.

[Biff Webster]

Yisman, I can try to fill in for you tomorrow, but can you tell me your process so I dont get to frustrated and stop?

[BettorBob]

Milwaukee, Cubs, and Boston were RL plays, actually. I notice you're counting everything as ML. Ah well.

In terms of risking to win 100, I think Milwaukee and Boston were - anyway, but the Cubs were +.

Yeah, unfortunately covers.com doesn't have the runlines so I have to grade everything as ML. I would love to know a good source of historical RL odds if anybody's got one.

[yisman]

will send PM, Biff.

[Nickelicious]

Yeah, unfortunately covers.com doesn't have the runlines so I have to grade everything as ML. I would love to know a good source of historical RL odds if anybody's got one.

There must be somewhere to get those historical RLs. VegasInsider?

But the RL odds would significantly alter the performance of this consensus system, so RL plays should be regraded at RL odds. If no source can be found, I think it would be safe to add 50 or 60 cents to the ML odds for grading purposes. The average difference between ML and RL odds is probably 70 or 80 cents (or more with heavy favorite MLs), so a 50 to 60 cent boost would seem conservative and legitimate.