[arconite]

Take #905 Chicago Cubs (-140) over Houston (2 p.m.)

Take #925 N.Y. Yankees (-145) over Boston (7 p.m.)

Take #913 Philadelphia (-105) over N.Y. Mets (7 p.m.)

Take #904 Atlanta (-1.5, +125) over Pittsburgh (1 p.m.)

Take #919 Kansas City (-130) over Cleveland (7 p.m.)

Today’s Totals
Take ‘Under’ 9.5 Chicago Cubs at Houston (2 p.m.)

Take ‘Under’ 9.5 N.Y. Yankees at Boston (7 p.m.)

Take ‘Over’ 8.0 Kansas City at Cleveland (7 p.m.)

Take ‘Under’ 9.5 Philadelphia at N.Y. Mets (7 p.m.)

Take ‘Under’ 9.0 San Francisco at Arizona (3:40 p.m.)

[peeiempee]

Based on line movement, his Philly ML and Under should be strong plays. Seeing RLM on under for cubs and under for giants.

[Joe Sharp]

RLM in favor of Cubs under or against??

[peeiempee]

Well not actually RLM for giants, I apologize. 85% of bettors are on the under and the line in all books stay at 9. For Cubs 60% of the bettors are on the under and the line goes from 9 to 9.5 in all books. Take this info and use it anyway you think benefits u

[Joe Sharp]

Thanks for the info!

In my experience I believe that in the Cubs situation while more people are on the under, bigger $ is on the over. Mainly because of the "over night" pitching change. R.Ortiz hasn't been a starter for quite some time. So, the "big $$" guys think the over has an edge. 60% really isn't that big of a deal to consider the over a strong "smart $$ play" though either. This is all in my opinion -- (IMO).

I'm interested to see how that one panes-out! Good Luck!!

I'm just kind of thinking out loud, so to speak.