[JsmooveFTW]

Mlb----

cin 1
stl 7
o
u 3

bos 11
det 2
o
u 3

bal 1
sea 9
o
u

col 4
hou 1
o 2
u

ari
lad 3
o
u 2

nym 10
pit 1
o
u

kc 1
tb 10
o 1
u 2

cle
min 3
o 1
u 2

mil 3
fla 2
o 2
u 1

sf 9
was 2
o 2
u 1

chc 5
atl 6
o
u 1

phi 3
sd 5
o 1
u 1

oak 1
cws 10
o
u 5

tex 4
nyy 4
o 1
u

laa 3
tor 1
o
u

[JsmooveFTW]

*FYI, the summary post is always updated before the tallies.

*no contest is any large consensus with 3 or less wagers on the opponent

Solid consensus winners (+2-4 advantage on one side; minimum 3 wagers)

Cardinals UNDER +3
Oakland UNDER +4
Red Sox UNDER +3
Rockies +3
Dodgers +3
Twins +3
Padres +3
Angels +2
White Sox +3

Overwhelming consensus winners (5+ advantage on one side)

Cardinals +6
Red Sox +9 *no contest
Seattle +8 *no contest
Rays +9 *no contest
Giants +7
White Sox +9 *no contest
Oakland UNDER +5




***bumped off the board - Yankees, Braves***

[Riot]

hey , i know you do alot already, but is their anyway you can also post next to the plays if any of them are like GOTY or something crazy special like that ??

[JsmooveFTW]

i've long thought about that and may do it one day but i honestly think it would be easier if other people did it in these threads. in a simple easy to read format of course. people could just bold them or something

[metsfan2008]

I've been trying to come up with some kind of way to account for the level of the play released by the capper to take into account of my own personal tallies. I'll let you know if I come up with something that might help us out Jsmoove. Thanks for all the good work

[ziptoe]

Jsmoove......YOU ROCK!!!!

[HighVoltage]

Why was STL not listed as "no contest"? The tally was 7-1.

[metsfan2008]

no contest is 8 or more.

[HighVoltage]

OK, but the White Sox tally was only 6-1, yet it is listed as +9 under the concensus. Maybe he did not update the first post?

[JsmooveFTW]

HighVoltage, the tallies are not as updated but i'll go ahead and do that. I was going to last night before bed but didn't get around to it because I took yesterday off after that lucky win with the Dodgers. The summary is what is consistently updated. It's not practical to keep them both equally updated

12-4 would not be a no contest. 8-1 would not be a no contest. 11-3 would be. 9-1 would be.

[JsmooveFTW]

*no contest is any large consensus with 3 or less wagers on the opponent

Solid consensus winners (+2-4 advantage on one side; minimum 3 wagers)

Cardinals UNDER +3 (L)
Red Sox UNDER +3 (L)
Rockies +3 (L)
Dodgers +3 (W)
Twins +3 (L)
Padres +3 (L)
Angels +2 (W) *RL winner

Overwhelming consensus winners (5+ advantage on one side)

Cardinals +6 (L)
Red Sox +9 (W) *RL winner; *no contest
Seattle +8 (W) *no contest
Rays +9 (W) *RL winner; *no contest
Giants +7 (postponed)
White Sox +9 (L) *no contest
Oakland UNDER +5 (W)


*ML winners by more than one run: 3-2*
*Overwhelming consensus winners: 4-2*
*Overwhelming winners by more than 1: 2-1*
*No contest winners: 3-1*


***bumped off the board - Yankees, Braves***