[JsmooveFTW]

Nhl----

det
pit 4
o 1
u 1


mlb----

oak
cws 4
o
u 1

sf 14
was 2
o
u

phi 7
sd 1
o 1
u 3

laa
tor 5
o
u 5

chc 5
atl 2
o 1
u 3

ari 2
lad 15
o
u 2

tex 4
nyy 2
o 1
u

mil 1
fla 3
o
u 2

nym 3
pit
o 1
u 4

col 6
hou 3
o 1
u 4

cle 1
min 8
o 1
u 1

cin
stl 4
o 1
u 2

bos 2
det 10
o
u 2

bal 3
sea 4
o 1
u 1

kc 1
tb 3
o
u 1

[Imgoinhungry]

How did yesterday turn out, other than the mets blowing it?

[Preston09]

this is cool

[JsmooveFTW]

*FYI, the summary post is always updated before the tallies.

*no contest is any large consensus with 3 or less wagers on the opponent

Solid consensus winners (+2-4 advantage on one side; minimum 3 wagers)

*NHL* Penguins +4
White Sox +4
Philly UNDER +2
Toronto UNDER +4
Cubs +3
Rangers +2
Marlins +2
Mets +3
Mets UNDER +3
Cardinals +4
Rays +4
Braves UNDER +3
Rockies UNDER +3
Rockies +4
Brewers UNDER +3
Boston UNDER +3
Dodgers UNDER +4

Overwhelming consensus winners (5+ advantage on one side)

Giants +18 *no contest
Dodgers +15 *no contest
Tigers +10 *no contest
Twins +8 *no contest
Philly +7
Toronto +5
Angels UNDER +5




***bumped off the board - Seattle***

[JsmooveFTW]

the updated results are on yesterday's thread. 1-1 on no contests and 3-2 on the overwhelming plays. all the runlines hit

[Imgoinhungry]

Well, runline for Mets didnt hit right?

[peeiempee]

I was up 2 units. Yankees, Astros, WSox RL winners. Mets and Mariners lost straight up. In retrospect, Mets were a Morrison A play according to the old system, so it would have been a no play for me. Would have been up 4 units.

[peeiempee]

Nice JS

[Imgoinhungry]

Which of the solid winners do we like the most?

[Imgoinhungry]

And which overwhelming winner do we think will cover the RL?

[Shempy]

Well, the best looking is the Dodgers....just look at that payout for the runline. And the Dodgers are one of the best if not the best homers. For me, that's the best.

[JsmooveFTW]

Well, runline for Mets didnt hit right?

It only applies to the plays that actually won. Only 1 or 2 runlines havent hit since i started doing this. 1 i think but cant remember for sure

[johncrud]

For this whole time, I thought I was supposed to fade these plays with a huge consensus.. Touts are doing their job right sometimes

[peeiempee]

I play it as a system. Whatever JS puts up there, I play the RL and ML using Jello's method on the overwhelming side. Might stay away from Phillies tonight. Has been pretty profitable. Hit a huge parlay using this and some other plays a couple of days ago, so I might be bias.

[Imgoinhungry]

What is Jello's method?

[JsmooveFTW]

sorry for the late update. bad storm came through and phones were out for a little bit

[johncrud]

JsmooveFTW-- Did you tally up picks from touts on this site only? Overwhelming consensus winners are so far performing quite well in despite that you will get 1-2 days occassionally from time to time.

[milkdud]

JsmooveFTW-- Did you tally up picks from touts on this site only? Overwhelming consensus winners are so far performing quite well in despite that you will get 1-2 days occassionally from time to time.

thanks 4 possting

[JsmooveFTW]

no i get as many different picks as i can from many different forums and weed out the dupes. that's the easy part. the hard part is weeding out the dupes of idiots that post dupes in the same forum

[JsmooveFTW]

Wolf looks like total shit tonight. Horrible pitching

[JsmooveFTW]

Garbage. That's the guy no one wanted to sign in the offseason finally showing up. **** me

[JsmooveFTW]

i owe tony pena a gift basket. one play a day can really suck sometimes but what a way to get a win


*no contest is any large consensus with 3 or less wagers on the opponent

Solid consensus winners (+2-4 advantage on one side; minimum 3 wagers)

*NHL* Penguins +4 (W)
White Sox +4 (L)
Philly UNDER +2 (L)
Toronto UNDER +4 (L)
Cubs +3 (L)
Rangers +2 (L)
Marlins +2 (W) *RL winner
Mets +3 (L)
Mets UNDER +3 (W)
Cardinals +4 (W) *RL winner
Rays +4 (W) *RL winner
Braves UNDER +3 (L)
Rockies UNDER +3 (W)
Rockies +4 (L)
Brewers UNDER +3 (L)
Boston UNDER +3 (W)
Dodgers UNDER +4 (L)

Overwhelming consensus winners (5+ advantage on one side)

Giants +18 (L) *no contest
Dodgers +15 (W) *no contest
Tigers +10 L) *no contest
Twins +8 (W) *no contest
Philly +7 (W) *RL winner
Toronto +5 (W) *RL winner
Angels UNDER +5 (L)


*ML winners by more than one run: 5-2*
*Overwhelming consensus winners: 4-3*
*Overwhelming winners by more than 1: 2-2*
*No contest winners: 2-2*


***bumped off the board - Seattle***