[JsmooveFTW]

Nba----

lal 12
den 30
o 6
u 9


Mlb----

stl 2
sf 10
o
u 2

was
phi 7
o 2
u 1

min 2
tb 7
o
u 2

nyy 5
cle 6
o 2
u 1

hou 1
pit 17
o 2
u 1

sea 4
laa 4
o
u

cin 13
mil 6
o 1
u 1

bos 8
tor 7
o 2
u 1

lad 5
chc 3
o 1
u 2

det 7
bal 4
o 4
u

sd 6
col 2
o 7
u 1

atl 9
ari 4
o 1
u

fla 4
nym 3
o 1
u 2

(gm1) oak 2
tex 1
o
u

(gm2) oak
tex 5
o 1
u 1

cws 3
kc 3
o 1
u

[JsmooveFTW]

Early game tallies ----

LAD 4
CHC 3
O 1
U 2

OAK 1
TEX
O
U

[JsmooveFTW]

*FYI, the summary post is always updated before the tallies.

*no contest is any large consensus with 3 or less wagers on the opponent

Solid consensus winners (+2-4 advantage on one side; minimum 3 wagers)

Tigers +3
Tigers OVER +4
Padres +4
Denver UNDER +3
---
Dodgers +2 *late add

Overwhelming consensus winners (5+ advantage on one side)

Reds +7
Rays +5
Giants +8 *no contest
Philly +7 *no contest
Pirates +16 *no contest
(Game 2) Texas +5
Denver +18 *hot hot*
Braves +5
Padres OVER +6



***bumped off - Angels, Marlins, Red Sox***

[JsmooveFTW]

WILL UPDATE LAKERS/NUGGETS TALLIES UP UNTIL 7:45 HERE

i assume you all have your wagers long since booked by now but for anyone that's curious I will update as best I can before gametime. Dupes ARE taken out of my tallies

Denver +17 *hot hot*

lal 13
den 30
o 6
u 9

[InTheHole]

Just remember Ferringo Tx 2 was a NO PLAY if TX won #1

[JsmooveFTW]

i didn't record ferringo for either of those plays. if i had plugged him in for the early game i would have had to remember to plug him in for the 2nd. It wasn't hard to tell the first play was a tossup anyway so i didn't fool with it. i think they will sweep the DH though. Go Denver. GL fellas

[JsmooveFTW]

no more nba/nhl playoffs for me. enough of those shenanigans. time to dig into mlb for the long term


Solid consensus winners (+2-4 advantage on one side; minimum 3 wagers)

Tigers +3 (L)
Tigers OVER +4 (L)
Padres +4 (L)
Denver UNDER +3 (L)
---
Dodgers +2 *late add (L)

Overwhelming consensus winners (5+ advantage on one side)

Reds +7 (L)
Rays +5 (W) *RL winner
Giants +8 *no contest (W) *RL winner
Philly +7 *no contest (W)
Pirates +16 *no contest (L)
(Game 2) Texas +5 (W) *RL winner
Denver +18 (L)
Braves +5 (W) *RL winner
Padres OVER +6 (L)


ML winners by more than 1: 4-1

[HoulihansTX]

great meticulous work keepin stats on these touts.

[BobHarvey]

Nice job on the stats. I noticed that one of the service providers here at SBR called the Laker win tonight.

All the "Big Names" were all over Denver with their "locks of the year" play of the year, 20 million unit play and all that BS. People looking for a winner on tonight's game only had to look on the front page of SBR Forum.

Modesty prevents me from revealing his name but feel free to check out his write-up:

http://www.sbrforum.com/Free+Picks/M...r-nuggets.aspx

[InTheHole]

Nice job on the stats. I noticed that one of the service providers here at SBR called the Laker win tonight.

All the "Big Names" were all over Denver with their "locks of the year" play of the year, 20 million unit play and all that BS. People looking for a winner on tonight's game only had to look on the front page of SBR Forum.

Modesty prevents me from revealing his name but feel free to check out his write-up:

http://www.sbrforum.com/Free+Picks/M...r-nuggets.aspx

[BobHarvey]

Thanks ITH!