[EaglesPhan36]

Just send 'em straight to prison to commence the whoring. Don't care if it was for media attention or because of brain fry. You need ass rape in your life when you do this.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...icle-1.1757577

Around 7 p.m., a barefoot man wearing a black veil and yelling “Boston Strong!” as he ran left one of the backpacks at the finish line near Boylston and Dartmouth, WBZ-TV reported.




The man was detained, and police have ordered media and bystanders to clear the area as the large black backpack is investigated.

[TwoWays]

He did nothing wrong. Wtf!?

[EaglesPhan36]

Yeah nothing wrong.

[ACoochy]

EP what law did he break pal?

Take away the obvious emotional connection and look at it from a legal viewpoint...

[TwoWays]

EP what law did he break pal?

Take away the obvious emotional connection and look at it from a legal viewpoint...

If it was up to eaglephan, one should be locked up for a dirty look.

[THam12]

Having no sense should be against the Law.

[ACoochy]

This should set a solid example as to where democracy is at in America right now...

Yeah what he did was jerkoffish but dont see how he actually broke a law

[tto827]

EP what law did he break pal?

Take away the obvious emotional connection and look at it from a legal viewpoint...

Can almost guarantee you either the city or state or the feds have a law stating it is illegal to cause a chaotic scene in a public area, such as yelling fire in a movie theatre or something similar.

Also, its potentially an act of terror, law/rights do not apply, we can lock the dude up in a bottomless pit for quite a while.

[ACoochy]

Can almost guarantee you either the city or state or the feds have a law stating it is illegal to cause a chaotic scene in a public area, such as yelling fire in a movie theatre or something similar.

Also, its potentially an act of terror, law/rights do not apply, we can lock the dude up in a bottomless pit for quite a while.

Unreal u lot let a bunch of 3rd world terrorists turn you into such a bunch of freedomless screaming pussies...

Terrorists win...again

[Kaabee]

if nothing else, they can get him for littering.

[bosigga]

if nothing else, they can get him for littering.

Which could carry a hefty fine. I feel those exist for purpose of taking a plea to lesser charge but paying a lot of moolah instead...make that fool think twice

[tto827]

Unreal u lot let a bunch of 3rd world terrorists turn you into such a bunch of freedomless screaming pussies...

Terrorists win...again

Bush mighta overstepped his boundaries with that one.. but if these guys are hell bent on attempting to harm innocent people, I got no problem with a little water boarding to prevent it.

What this man did SHOULD BE A CRIME, so I hope he gets whatever he has coming.

[InTheDrink]

there is a law against terrorism hoaxes...and its pretty much universal in some form or fashion in the developed world

anyone who thinks it shouldnt be needs to get their head checked

[Ghenghis Kahn]

ummmm... for the people saying he did nothing wrong.

go to your local airport (of course unarmed, preferably naked) and yell as loud as you can,"i have a bomb!!!!"

and let us know how that goes. of course in your eyes, you'd be doing nothing wrong...

[MiDNiTe]

yeah but he didnt yell i have a bomb he was supporting the marathon with boston strong maybe his backpack was bit heavy

[TheMoneyShot]

Interesting posts on this topic.

My initial reaction was... this dude is in major trouble "causing a scene."

But...

He dropped a pressure cooker... and camera equipment in bags. No bombs. No explosive devices.

What did he do wrong? Nothing except for... again... littering. But technically that isn't littering. He wasn't throwing anything away.


Hmmmmmm... does SBR have a legal analysis around? We need one.


All you could get him for...

1. Disturbing the public.

2. Possible littering.

3. I don't know if there's a law called "attempt to recreate a horrific scene in which destroyed hundreds of peoples lives?"

Might be a new law.

[InTheDrink]

Interesting posts on this topic.

My initial reaction was... this dude is in major trouble "causing a scene."

But...

He dropped a pressure cooker... and camera equipment in bags. No bombs. No explosive devices.

What did he do wrong? Nothing except for... again... littering. But technically that isn't littering. He wasn't throwing anything away.


Hmmmmmm... does SBR have a legal analysis around? We need one.


All you could get him for...

1. Disturbing the public.

2. Possible littering.

3. I don't know if there's a law called "attempt to recreate a horrific scene in which destroyed hundreds of peoples lives?"

Might be a new law.

what do you suppose the bombers used last year as bombs?

[InTheDrink]

acoochy is a jerkoff troll....youd think he'd know the laws in his country before ragging on another's

A legislative provision for 'hoax offences' will create a more serious charge for people who cause chaos for the public and emergency services by dreaming up devastating terrorist-inspired hoaxes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Terrorism_Act_2005

[EaglesPhan36]

Endangering public safety. They'll finda dozen things to charge the idiot with and he deserves whatever comes his way. He's lucky there wasn't a trigger happy cop around.

[ACoochy]

[ACoochy]

acoochy is a jerkoff troll....youd think he'd know the laws in his country before ragging on another's



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Terrorism_Act_2005

Finished that last bottle huh drinker??

[InTheDrink]

Finished that last bottle huh drinker??

australia

why so much insecurity

[ACoochy]

australia

why so much insecurity

freedoms
Sorry 4 not being accepting and standing by whilst injustice becomes law.

To me resistance to this is my duty as it should be yours if you really are patriotic to the greater good of the society to which you belong...

[TheMoneyShot]

what do you suppose the bombers used last year as bombs?

Doesn't a pressure cooker have to be "activated" somehow? Could be just a regular pressure cooker with nothing inside. No violence in that.

[ACoochy]

Doesn't a pressure cooker have to be "activated" somehow? Could be just a regular pressure cooker with nothing inside. No violence in that.

Shotter too many nationally traumatized mofos still running around wanting to hang the perp first before asking questions.

Why these people so scared if they or their government has done nothing wrong??

[TheCentaur]

Lets all talk this over at burn ban 2/4 NL

[InTheDrink]

freedoms
Sorry 4 not being accepting and standing by whilst injustice becomes law.

To me resistance to this is my duty as it should be yours if you really are patriotic to the greater good of the society to which you belong...

so youre writing your own government about a nearly decade old law in addition to trolling this thread?

[InTheDrink]

australia = police state

[TheMoneyShot]

Lets all talk this over at burn ban 2/4 NL

I would Cen but you take all my points

I'm kind of poker'd out.

[ACoochy]

so youre writing your own government about a nearly decade old law in addition to trolling this thread?

Writing??

Drinker Mr King penned it best imo when explaining the difference between just and unjust laws (and yes terrorists were rife back in his day also).

"One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws."

Its the kids who i feel sorriest for, for they will never know what its like to live in a country where true freedom exists...

[ACoochy]

australia = police state

America = Shoot first ask questions later

[InTheDrink]

Writing??

Drinker Mr King penned it best imo when explaining the difference between just and unjust laws (and yes terrorists were rife back in his day also).

"One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws."

Its the kids who i feel sorriest for, for they will never know what its like to live in a country where true freedom exists...

so why are you evading that the law that i posted about terrorism hoaxes is an australian law?

[jjgold]

just a typical nut job

not even surprised

America full of low class people

[ChalkyDog]

This is America.

Bill the dumb bastard for the time and resources spent by the public because of this fiasco.

If sick people have to pay for an ambulance because of 'Murica, then this fukktard should have to pay for the police response and other things associated.

He'd happily give a lb of flesh and freedom to avoid that bill.

[InTheDrink]

America = Shoot first ask questions later

you really are a fukkin idiot

The "Shoot to kill" clause instructs police to treat people wanted under detention orders in the same way that an equivalent clause in the current law treats wanted suspects.

The clause in particular has raised the concern of some state premiers, the so-called "Shoot to kill" clause, where police may use lethal force if they perceive a threat to life. The clause was not put to the premiers in the original discussions between the States and Federal Governments.

Law Council of Australia president John North, suggested that such powers were designed to protect police in the event of a mistaken fatal shooting such as that of Jean Charles de Menezes.