It's pitchers/catchers time, baseball is all but upon us.
Printable View
It's pitchers/catchers time, baseball is all but upon us.
Have you released the criterias of MLB PLU$$$
V1? It's a mix of different systems, right?
You play it @ what % of roll?
Hi Wallco99
Thanks for the tread in NBA. I look forward to follow you in MLB as well. Since I am new for the baseball betting I wonder if You can do a "once and for all" explanation how You play? Then You can only copy and paste for others to read as well. I will give You as many points You like for this work you do...just tell me how many you like.
Thanks
All aboard Walco.
Good luck this year.
wallco, will u tell us how the system work, or do i u gonna keep that for yourself??
Because it it not here yet, I haven't finished reviewing 2011 and making adjustments, and I don't care about it yet. My personal bets have nothing to do with how others play any system. The backtests are provided, base your personal wagers on your comfort level of those results. Enough already. It's a four game chase syatem, play whatever % roll you normally would on a chase. If I play 1% or 5%, really doesn't matter to how others are going to do it.
Just to help out people decide their unit size for MLB PLU$$$.
Based on Wallco's results posted last year & with 2011 going even (we will adjust that later).
MLB PLU$$$ will produce:
520 units or less: 100% of the time
200 units or less: 86.8% of the time
100 units or less: 58.6% of the time
50 units or less: 40.8% of the time
0 units or less: 24.73% of the time
-50 units or worst: 12.86% of the time
-100 units or worst: 5.67% of the time
-150 units or worst: 2.1 % of the time
Wallco
When you will have the time, can you provide us with each season's record in terms of # of series win/loss, please?
I think a big thing here is bankroll management. If you bet 1% as a unit, if the system swings to -100 units at any point you will be broke. It can than recover and even end the year in the green, but that doesnt matter because you would have lost your entire roll and be forced to quit.
So Wallco, it would be nice information to know what types of swings you saw in the backtest, and to what extent in the red. With a year at around -150 you would need to be playing .5% roll/unit but for all I know it could have swung to -200 at any point and you would have lost it all before recovering anything back.
Im gonna follow this v1 this year, probably do 1% units and hope for no big red swings:grrr:
Don't hope. Protect yourself.
Blah, Blah, Blah, up until last season it produced +594 units. 2011 stats will be posted when I have finished compiling. For anyone getting confused by the complex posts that are starting to appear in this thread, +594 is the bottom line. I play systems for the long haul. not day-day, or week-week, or unit-unit, as some folks appear to be doing. If you started playing in 2005 and stopped in 2011, you would have 594 more units than you started with. I will updare 2011 once I determine how much of the loss was from v2.
Thanks- checking in
Peace! :peace:
just checking in. thanks for starting wallco. maybe guys can keep it to baseball only :)
Looking forward to it!
:cheers:
Maxi, we understand your point about swings and streaks, etc. But the fact is that the system is not broken into seasons. It is continuous, like all systems. It is the bettor who falsely stops and starts every year and therefore creates yearly stats.
2006 bombed, therefore anyone joining in 2005 would not have a BR to enjoy the benefits of 2007-2010. If the bettor started playing the system in 2007, he would still be in profit after 2011, even though 2010 wasn't profitable..
Bottom line: use your own judgement to decide when to get on the train, how much to pay for the ticket and when to get off. Wallco drives the train, not the passengers.
Kev
I know it's continuous Kev. And this argument just increases the importance of what I'm saying. The fact that it's continuous tells us that the swing could have been worst than -147 units. IT CAN'T BE LESS. If the end of 2005 or the beginning of 2007 are downfalls, the downswing in the continuity is just worst.
My point is that it is so easy, using excel, to graph your results and then say: " Ok guys, I created a great system that generated 574 units in 6 seasons, the worst downswing being X units." I can't believe he doesn't provide us with that info. One click in excel...
Nobody wants to dig into the dark side of it. I know it is a POWERFUL system. Don't you think I've already figured that out with all the thoroughness with wich I analyse systems. But gambling is all about the RISK/REWARD equation. So we need both variables.
edit: I should have PM Kev. Sorry for that.
I am ready for this year to start already! Can't wait for baseball season.
GL Wallco I will be trailing you.