Wallco could you post a link to your baseball thread from last year? I need a good laugh.
Printable View
Wallco could you post a link to your baseball thread from last year? I need a good laugh.
Don't know what your sudden problem is, but you've got the wrong guy. Post this clown's name in the email that you speak of and I'll be the first one to say not to buy anything from him. Besides, my hockey rules are posted in post #1 of my thread, and I've posted every pick for free, so why would I pick one jackass, who I never heard of before today, happen to guess his email address, and try to sell him a system that I am already posting? Not to mention, try to do it secretly, without first mentioning it on here for advertisement reasons, and best of all, with a similar name.Quote:
Originally Posted by KennyM10
:+cluelessQuote:
Originally Posted by KennyM10
The answer to your itchy head can be found in my NHL thread:Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackroc78
http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/hockey-bet...s-6-years.html
Just checking in. I see it's going to be another fun year.:popcorn:
We probably ought to post the JM MLB Sytem rules;
MLB System
Here’s the MLB betting system in detail. As long as you strictly follow my betting guidelines below, you will be winning almost all of your MLB bets.
In a nutshell, you will be betting that one team is going to win at least one game in either 3 or 4 game series versus an opposing team that has swept them in their most recent series. This is a bet that you will win more than 97% of the time.
Before I go into detail on how to make the bets, I will go over the money management system. There are only three bet values you should stick to: Bet A; Bet B; and Bet C.
Bet A = Your beginning bet. You can, for example, set your beginning bet to win $100 when you first start out.
Bet B = In case Bet A fails, you make bet B to make up for any loss you’ve suffered from Bet A, plus any profit you would have achieved from bet A. So, if your to-win Bet A was $100, your to-win Bet B can be $200.
Bet C = In case Bet B fails, you make bet C to make up for any loss you’ve suffered from Bet A plus Bet B, plus profit you would have achieved from bet A. So, if your to-win Bet A plus Bet B was $300, your to-win Bet C can be $400.
If you lose Bet C, you lose the bet. There may be an occasion when you place a “D” bet, but it’s extremely rare. We will talk more on that later.
However, do not be concerned, because losing a Bet C is something that will almost never happen. Here’s the betting system:
1. Check the MLB results and mark down any series where one team goes winless versus the opposing team (a sweep)
2. For the teams that were swept (winless in those series), mark the schedule for their upcoming series versus the same team that swept them previously
3. On the first day of the rematch between the two teams, as long as the team that was swept previously has an RPI value of no less than .015 than the opposing team, AND the opposing team is not a top-2 RPI team, make a bet for the team that was swept. (Note: The RPI will be explained in greater details in a later section of this manual)
4. If you lose bet A, make bet B on the next day for the same team
5. If you lose bet B, make bet C on the next day for the same team
And keep this in mind: ALWAYS bet on the money line if the team you’re betting on is the favorite to win (shows -1.5 on the run line). ALWAYS bet on the run line (+1.5 runs) if the team you’re betting on is the underdog (shows +1.5 on the run line). You can check to see which team is the favorite or the underdog by looking at the run line in the
bet lineup. A team showing a +1.5 in the run line means they are the underdog. A team showing a -1.5 in the run line means they are the favorite.
If you are unfamiliar with betting, below is a screenshot of what you may see on BetUS
Example#1: Atlanta sweeps Florida in a 3-game series, then sweeps them again in a 2-game series. If they play a 3 game series next time, then that would qualify for a system play on Florida.
Example#2: Atlanta sweeps Florida in a 3-game series, then goes 1-1 against Florida a 2-game series. If they play a 3 game series next time, then that would not qualify for a system play.
V2.0 System UPDATE:
The update here is designed to allow you even more action during the course of the baseball season by increasing your wager on betting opportunities that have an exceptional probability of betting success.
The change to this new v2.0 system is that you want to increase your stake on the [b] level when these 2 criteria are met:
The change to this new v2.0 system is that you want to increase your stake on the [b] level when these 2 criteria are met:
1. The team you’re betting on is playing at home.
2. The [A] bet that you made resulted in your team losing by 3 or more runs.
Similarly, you want to increase your stake on the [C] level when these 2 criteria are met:
1. The team you’re betting on is playing at home.
2. The [b] bet that you made resulted in your team losing by 3 or more runs.
Here’s an example of the v2.0 system in action:
During the 2008 MLB baseball season, the Detroit Tigers played the Minnesota Twins on the road from May 2nd to May 4th and were swept in all 3 games.
On May 23rd, they began another 3-game series with the Minnesota twins, this time at home. Since the Detroit Tigers fell within the accepted .01 range of RPI disparity with the Minnesota Twins at the time, the series was good to go for betting.
Yet, on 5/23/08, Detroit lost to Minnesota again on the [A] bet by a score of 4-9. Since Detroit lost by at least 3 points at the [A] level, and since they’re playing at home, this would make the [b] bet to fall under the criteria for betting in the v2.0 MLB system.
This means that the next day, on May 24th, you should increase your wagering amount by at least two-fold. So, let’s say that you lost $150 on the [A] bet with Detroit. Instead of betting to win $250 (to attain a $100 profit for the series) as you normally would do, you can double up and bet to win $350 (to attain a $200 profit for the series).
Indeed, the Detroit Tigers came back the next day and completely annihilated Minnesota by their season-record score of 19-3!
Now, I want to note to you that you should of course still make all the bets according to the v1.0 system. However, when a situation arises that meets the criteria of the v2.0 betting system, you should then increase your wager on that betting level by at least twice or more.
V3.0 System UPDATE:
The update here is designed to allow you even more betting opportunities during the course of the baseball season by taking advantage of the unofficial plays that fall outside of the acceptable level of RPI difference between the two teams.
The addition to this new v3.0 system is that you want to make a wager for the team that previously did the sweep (NOT the team that was swept previously!) if the following 2 criteria are met:
1. The team that they swept previously came back and beat them on the very first game of their rematch series.
2. They have an RPI of at least .025 or higher than their opponent.
If your bet loses, you would go on and make a [b] bet for the same team the next day. Most of the v3.0 bets will involve betting on a 2-game series. However, in some rare cases you can also make a [C] bet if both your [A] and [b] bet lose, and the series rematch is a 4-game series allowing you an extra final game to make a [C] wager.
Remember, the same betting rules apply: Always bet on the money line if the team you’re betting on is the favorite to win. Always bet on the run line (+1.5 runs) if the team you’re betting on is the underdog. You can check to see which team is the favorite or the underdog by looking at the run line in the bet lineup. A team showing a +1.5 in the
Here’s an example of the v3.0 system in action:
During the 2008 MLB baseball season, the Boston Red Sox played the Kansas City Royals from May 19th to May 22nd and swept them in the entire series.
On August 4th, Boston played Kansas City again in a 3-game series. At this time during the season, Boston's RPI was at least .025 higher than Kansas City, making the series fall outside of the original v1.0 system's betting criteria for Kansas City. However, Kansas City ended up winning the first game of the series on August 4th.
Since Boston was the team that swept Kansas City previously, and their RPI is at least .025 higher than Kansas City, the fact that Kansas City came back and won the first game vs. Boston make the series eligible for play under the v3.0 MLB system.
Therefore, on August 5th, you would put down an [A] bet for Boston to beat Kansas City. Boston ended up winning the game. At this point you've won the betting series, and there's no need to make any more wagers for either team.
IF Boston had lost to Kansas City again on August 5th, then you would need to place a [b] bet for Boston again on August 6th when they play Kansas City in the final game.
There are no possible [C] bets in this series.
RPI Info: http://espn.go.com/mlb/stats/rpi
History: covers.com/[/QUOTE]
I would have like to have gotten this on an easy to remember post but I guess #111 is good enough.
hey hagball do you have previous years win/loss in terms of season units using JM?
Now, for MLB Plu$$
Plu$$ System
Shhhhhhhhh! :shhh: :quiet: :shhh:
Don't leave us hangin' - What's the Plu$$ System????????
This is my last post from last season:Quote:
Originally Posted by nrok2118
JM MLB System
2011 Official season series record 29-1 (v1)
(A) 16-14
(B) 10-4
(C) 3-1
V2 plays 12-12
V3 system 9-1
Unofficial series 57-6
*Unofficial*
(9/28/2011) Cleveland (.496) @ Detroit (.516) R/L (C) Win
(9/28/2011) Atlanta (.513) v Philadelphia (.532) M/L (C) Loss
(9/28/2011) Colorado (.487) @ San Francisco (.506) R/L (C) Win
Notes: That's the final tally on the John Morrison MLB system for 2011. He goes out with two (C) bet wins and a loss. Most of those unofficial (C) loses came in the month of September. So in the future you might keep that in mind. Look forward to seeing all of you in the other threads. Let's all keep trying to amass sickening fortunes. GL
I do not have any previous years records but there are other people who may have them. They might post. As far as units accumulated, you figure 1 unit won per series and one lost series will equal approx. 15 units give or take a little on the lines. Hope this helps.
P.S. If you ask Morrison, he claims he went 31-0 last year. He disqualified the 1 loss through some lame ass filter and none of us know where he came up with the other 2 wins.
It is not much play in his MLB system
Has anyone backtested, to play the unofficial series reverse, the team that swept, gonna win 1 of 3 again?
No one's hangin'. It's the same system it was last year.Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyBeans
Probably works, but I am sure there is a lot of juice involved since they swept the team. I'm sure someone back tested it before, but i have not seen it yet. I do know the question has definitely been asked before.Quote:
Originally Posted by knugen
just checking in. lets gooooo.
Hag- Welcome back!Quote:
Originally Posted by hagball52
Thanks for all of your help
looking for the shutout system if anyone would be kind enough to post a link or guide me to it. tx.
All of the MLB systems are in the MLB forum...You'll find them
SEARCH is your friend.
You're like Bugs Bunny today, you're everywhere! Bugs on first, Bugs on third, Bugs in left..... That was a great episode by the way.Quote:
Originally Posted by stevex
Just found wallcos was down over 100 unitsQuote:
Originally Posted by stevex
Glad to see you back as well. Let's make some bank this baseball season.:grrr:Quote:
Originally Posted by bauerranch
Checking in, lets do this
I'm in...
I would like to work on my discipline by following a system.... did this mlb system do well last year?
Wallco, out of curiosity... Which mlb systems will be playing, and how will you be playing them (as in labby or chase)? Thanks!
Mine(MLB Plu$$), JM, on3, and one I created at the end of last season that I did not post, it did pretty well. I chase EVERYTHING.Quote:
Originally Posted by njb5572
Wallco please stop leaching off other threads. I love how you start the j m thread to really just promote your losing thread. Be a man link your results from last year here.
Why? Do you think there are a lot of people in this thread who don't know how last year went?Quote:
Originally Posted by KennyM10
Why don't you take whatever hard-on you have for Wallco and your self-designated savior status and shove it.
It is unbelievable how ignorant people are. Wallco posts his picks for free and never complains. You idiots are making demands from him. Why the hell would he care to have your respect lol? Use the search function to find last years results.....Does your mom wipe your ass for you? I know Wallco's sharing his picks because of the few good guys in here but for the most part, there are a bunch of yahoos running their mouths....Quote:
Originally Posted by KennyM10
So I guess this is all you have left since my other two systems are kicking ass, and soon, you won't even have this, as it will also. Apparently you reading skills are as weak as your ability to decipher between the words leaching and leeching, or you would have seen that MLB Plu$$ v1 system has produced +600 units in the past 7 years. And even if we count the experimental v2 from last season, which is no longer part of the system, we are still at +520. So yes my man, you are STUPID. And by the way, I will post my system wherever the hell I want! And just sit back and criticize all season, as you have, while the rest of us have continued on to win 107 units in my NBA and NHL systems, for that, we laugh at you. I love when STUPID people such as yourself come in here, it gives me something else to do besides post plays.Quote:
Originally Posted by KennyM10
Let's see, three systems I have posted on here have amassed over +1300 units in the past 6-7 years, but wait they suck because a jealous A-hole says so, convinced me! :lmao::lmao::lmao:
I'm aware of Wallco's MLB thread from last year, and I'm still here Kenny. If he loses, so be it. He posts and tracks his picks accurately, so I don't see a reason for the hate. If you don't want in on it, that's fine.
Points to the first one that posts his real record here from last year. Include the 2 losses right at the end that he never added on.
wallco, if i were guessing on who you are, i had gguessed on a old man, around 70 sitting in your house and screaming on all the kids in your neighborhood! You are so angry wallco, but i dont understand why you are, im sure your baseball system will success this season, dont worry be happy
Not at all, very happy, and age is way off. But thanks for your interest. Just have to do my due diligence and respond to our forum village idiots.Quote:
Originally Posted by knugen
Don't worry douchebag, the stats for previous years will be posted just as they are every season. Not to mention, you act as if no one was around to remember it, what an idiot. But while you wait, stop into my other successful threads and check out the large profits you missed out on, and I'm glad you did!Quote:
Originally Posted by KennyM10