Another R arrested on sex charges

dante1 · 08-27-2007, 06:44 PM

Okay, I admit I am a liberal democrat. But, am I full of bs or in almost every arrest for homosexual solicitation or homosexual whatever it is an R? My God, the last four or five in this past year have been R's. You may be saying so what, and I agree. I don't care if you need to have sex with a horse. Not my business, but why is it always an R? This is the party that frowns on homosexuals. Why in the world would you join and represent the R's if you're a homosexual?
Can't figure that out. Do you hate yourself? The hypocrites.

This is the same party that is telling people that the gov must stay out of personal lives. And yet this is the same party that passes the gambling bill.

This party is pissin off a ton of people and I think it might
be possible that they could even lose a very red state or two in this next national. Of course, some R's would vote for the devil, now that I think of it they already did.

BatemanPatrickl · 08-27-2007, 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dante1

Okay, I admit I am a liberal democrat. But, am I full of bs or in almost every arrest for homosexual solicitation or homosexual whatever it is an R? My God, the last four or five in this past year have been R's. You may be saying so what, and I agree. I don't care if you need to have sex with a horse. Not my business, but why is it always an R? This is the party that frowns on homosexuals. Why in the world would you join and represent the R's if you're a homosexual?
Can't figure that out. Do you hate yourself? The hypocrites.

This is the same party that is telling people that the gov must stay out of personal lives. And yet this is the same party that passes the gambling bill.

This party is pissin off a ton of people and I think it might
be possible that they could even lose a very red state or two in this next national. Of course, some R's would vote for the devil, now that I think of it they already did.

Where is the news story about "Another R Arrested on Drug Charges"?

dante1 · 08-27-2007, 09:36 PM

Bateman

Don't get your drift? This is another homosexual story, this time for solicitation.

BatemanPatrickl · 08-28-2007, 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dante1

Bateman

Don't get your drift? This is another homosexual story, this time for solicitation.

That is what I meant; I didn't see this story in the news.

Willie Bee · 08-28-2007, 07:25 AM

He might be referring to this one, bateman. Personally, I dodn't associate this stuff with one party or the other. But if it somehow helps bolster someone's own political beliefs, I guess that's ok.

BatemanPatrickl · 08-28-2007, 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willie Bee

He might be referring to this one, bateman. Personally, I dodn't associate this stuff with one party or the other. But if it somehow helps bolster someone's own political beliefs, I guess that's ok.

Thanks Willie; another black eye for the Republicans

ShamsWoof10 · 08-28-2007, 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willie Bee

Personally, I dodn't associate this stuff with one party or the other.

I agree.. Not only is one party homo/bi but they both are... Actually not only are they both homo/bi but most of the ruling body of the world is... It's no secret the Saudi Royal Family are/were homo/bi and since most of the world's elite party together (The Bahemian Grove) I would not doubt if a good number of the world leaders are homo/bi... IMO I suspect George Bush and the late Yassir Arafat as two of a very long list..

dante1 · 08-28-2007, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willie Bee

He might be referring to this one, bateman. Personally, I dodn't associate this stuff with one party or the other. But if it somehow helps bolster someone's own political beliefs, I guess that's ok.

Willie Bee, I think you might be missing my point. I certainly don't need this type of info to denigrate the R's. This current administration has done quite well at that, thank you.

No, my point is that the R's supposedly represent the "family" and don't agree very much with a homosexual life style. I don't think that point can be argued very much. If so, then why would a homosexual chose to run and win as an R. And at the very same time these same homosexuals are preaching against homsexuality. That has happened more than two or three times in the past year. That was my point.
Where is the sense in that. Why do these closet homosexuals chose the R party when they know that the social R's hate them. Just confusing.

I certanly understand that every party has a certain population of homosexuals. I don't care about that, that is not my point. And I certainly don't care about the homosexual life style either. It is the lying by mostly R conservative religious right crazies that makes me crazy.
These same guys preach family values and then want to have sex with a stranger in the mens' room. How many times has this happened already?

Willie Bee · 08-28-2007, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dante1

This current administration has done quite well at that, thank you.

True, so true. And you're right, hypocrisy at any level or within any group is always confusing. I grew up a confused child politically to begin with being raised by a Hoover Republican for a father and an FDR/LBJ Democrat for a mom. Is it any wonder that I turned out an anarchist?