[bigboydan]

Give me a freaking break!

WASHINGTON - The cars, SUVS and pickups people will buy in the years ahead are likely to use less fuel, and many will rely on ethanol or household electricity instead of gasoline.

The energy legislation pushed through the Senate this week provides a road map to the future, demanding higher automobile fuel economy, mandating huge increases in ethanol as a motor fuel and supporting more research into building "plug-in" hybrid-electric vehicles.

While Senate Republicans complained that the bill does nothing to increase domestic oil production, Democrats said that's because the nation must move energy policy away from its heavy reliance on oil.

The Senate voted 65-27 in favor of the bill late Thursday night. Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., voted for it, and Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla., voted against it. The House is preparing its own version.

The Senate bill requires automakers to increase fuel economy to 35 miles per gallon, about a 40 percent increase over what cars, SUVs and small trucks are required to achieve now. It would lump all the vehicles under a single regulation, but also give manufacturers flexibility so large SUVs wouldn't have to meet the same requirements as smaller cars.

And for the first time, the president would have to find ways to cut oil demand by 20 percent of what it is expected to be in 2017 - a target President Bush has embraced - and attain further reductions after that.

"The goal is to replace fossil fuels with alternative fuels and use conservation, " said Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., who was involved in the bill.

Automakers, lobbying hard against the fuel economy provision in the Senate bill, expressed continued concern Friday about their ability to meet the requirements without changing the mix of cars they will be able to provide in the showrooms of 2020.

"There's no way you can get those numbers without a dramatic shift in consumer choice, " said Mark LaNeve, General Motors' vice president of North America sales, service and marketing. "We don't know how it's attainable."

[BigBollocks]

Wow Dan, didn't see you being one of the 27 that would have been with the "nays," especially seeing as how the 27 voting against were the most staunch of the neo-cons...

[Dark Horse]

If our cars did 40 miles on the gallon we wouldn't have to import any oil.

But some Americans are attached to their guzzlers.

[onlòóker]

Yeah. I know a guy that was always complaining about money. Then he goes out and buys a brand new F150, lifts it, and puts the big tires on it. I don't think he gets 12 miles to the gallon on that thing now. Then he goes and buys a house, that he can't really afford.

The guy don't gamble, and its a good thing, because his money management skills blow.

[bigboydan]

We wouldn't even be having this discussion at all if they just let them drill for oil up in Alaska.