[reno cool]

EBSB:

seriously man. If I wanted to read a novel I'd start with War and Peace.

[slacker00]

EBSB:

seriously man. If I wanted to read a novel I'd start with War and Peace.

I know. I stopped reading his "questions" about a month ago. Now it's just a curiosity for me why he still thinks he's remotely relevant. It's like walking past the neighborhood dog just to watch it bark.

[EBSB52]

I know. I stopped reading his "questions" about a month ago. Now it's just a curiosity for me why he still thinks he's remotely relevant. It's like walking past the neighborhood dog just to watch it bark.

Hey, if you acquiesce that's your business. Pathetic that you avoid all issues and then claim victory.

[EBSB52]

EBSB:

seriously man. If I wanted to read a novel I'd start with War and Peace.

Many people write long posts, I answer every word in them, I feel those that cherrypick to be cowards.

[EBSB52]

I'm not a neocon. This is where I stop reading.

And you stop writing before you begin. I read the previous posts you wrote and referenced and you really are vanilla ice cream. You really don't place yourself anywhere politically. I really don't care what you stand for, but make assertions, I respond and you run, then come back to whine. It's really inane.

Just answer one of the many, many cited posts of mine.

[EBSB52]

I know. I stopped reading his "questions" about a month ago. Now it's just a curiosity for me why he still thinks he's remotely relevant. It's like walking past the neighborhood dog just to watch it bark.

You quit when you realized I debunked them and you had no retort.


Some of your concepts are out there. You basically sound like a version of a Libertarian, but I don’t care about you, just want to examine some of your brilliance.
You think public means government-owned, just nutty. So if a private business is open to the public, it is government property?
You think that if you don’t pay taxes that your property will be confiscated w/o due process, have you heard of the court system? Under Clinton, the rules were changed to make the IRS use the federal court system, rather than their own, so there is due process.
Then you say that you will be arrested for not registering your car tags.
It goes on and on, you made statements, I answered them, now you run and n=don’t want to be called a runner. Now you call for my ouster. Do you wonder why I call you a chicken?
Here’s the list:
1) You asserted that public means government-owned; do you still assert that in light of dictionary/encyclopedic differences? Isn't government-controlled more honest?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public
Public, n, is also defined as the people of a nation not affiliated with the government of that nation.


4) Slacker claims that if he doesn’t pay taxes that, “your property be confiscated (without Constitutional due process, I might add) by the IRS” Do you stand on this, w/o due process in light of contradictory information?
http://taxattorneyarticles.com/irs-tax-lien.php
No properties can't. IRS earning agents are required to attempt every other team process to get payment for your arrears before they can put a levy on your property, bank account, or wages. There are a monkey of ways that you can pay off an IRS tax money owing and also installment agreement, offer in compromise, innocent spouse, and others.
Is there any way too the IRS can't put a levy on my property or wages? There are certain situations at which the IRS can't impose a levy, but a levy can only be held off for a short time. The short list for when the IRS can't levy you is: while you are in an installment agreement; additonally your request for a payment agreement is underway; for 30 days in the wake of a request for an agreement has been rejected or an installment has ended; additonally you are in bankruptcy.

Here’s an appellate case that talks of constant constitutional requirements, so do you still stand that there are no due process requirements for the IRS to seize property for taxes?
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/...h/0250377p.pdf


5) Slacker says the state licenses, taxes, surcharges, and regulates all transportation on land, in the air, and on the waterways, whether it be for private or commercial use. If you do not pay the fees, you will be arrested on the highway, on the landing strip, or on the river. So do you stand by this? The state will cite and release, a form of an arrest, but not as you state it, they will not haul you off in cuffs, it’s a ticket.

Also, should taxes not be assessed so airports can be maintained? Should we be tax abolitionists and avoid taxing airports so the private community can figure it out?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landing_fee


6) Slacker says the Federal Communication Commission that regulates what you can hear over the radio and taxes the radio stations. Slacker, should the FCC allow any and all profanity, nudity, etc? Radio stations get taxed as any business, they may have additional FCC usage fees/taxes, but many businesses do.


7) Slacker claims the control of industry by government has expanded into every factory and instrument of production (essentially that’s a human being, according to Marx). Is this true, even in light of mass deregulation of the airlines, communication, banking and other industries?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deregulation
Deregulation, a term which gained widespread currency in the period 1970-2000, can be seen as a process by which governments remove, reduce, or simplify restrictions on business and individuals, often ostensibly with the intent of encouraging the efficient operation of private markets, but also with the intent of opening up new areas of trade for speculators.


8) Slacker says child labor in factories was really nasty, so we’ll just use NAFTA and GATT to exploit the kids of the Third World. Even though 3rd world labor was around long before NAFTA and GATT, is it the fault of these tax laws that we exploit 3rd world kids? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maquilladora

[slacker00]

You really don't place yourself anywhere politically.

You are simply wrong. Read pretty much anything I write, and it's colored by my political leanings. I vote. I participate in the various levels of politics both locally & nationally. I admit I kinda shut myself down in this thread when I saw how you were just going to flame me no matter where I stand, so I thought it would be cute to let you guess, since you don't seem to understand. Trust me, it's been very entertaining for me to watch you make all kinds of false accusations regarding my true political affiliation.

Just answer one of the many, many cited posts of mine.

Once again, you are begging for my time, my intelligence, my wisdom. I thought you didn't care about my response. Can you make up your mind?

[EBSB52]

You are simply wrong. Read pretty much anything I write, and it's colored by my political leanings. I vote. I participate in the various levels of politics both locally & nationally. I admit I kinda shut myself down in this thread when I saw how you were just going to flame me no matter where I stand, so I thought it would be cute to let you guess, since you don't seem to understand. Trust me, it's been very entertaining for me to watch you make all kinds of false accusations regarding my true political affiliation.

Once again, you are begging for my time, my intelligence, my wisdom. I thought you didn't care about my response. Can you make up your mind?

You are simply wrong. Read pretty much anything I write, and it's colored by my political leanings.

I'm not doing some wild research on you, I don't care what you're about, other than you make irrational assertions and run off when people call you on them, so I label you - that simple.

I vote. I participate in the various levels of politics both locally & nationally. I admit I kinda shut myself down in this thread when I saw how you were just going to flame me no matter where I stand, so I thought it would be cute to let you guess, since you don't seem to understand.

Shut yourself down is a way to say you chickened out. OK, your right, just don't shift your shortcommings onto me, I want you to answer the questions. I understand, your right / Libertarian leanings are indefensable, which explains why you don't reply. I'm used to it, it really isn't fair representing LW ideals, it's like shooting fish in a barrel. Although I represented those ideals when it wasn't popular, with 5 of 7 terms run by the right, as well as congress being RW a lot of that time, now it's easy. Under Reagan when people thought he was the grandpa of the country, it was difficult to explain how he was fvcking things up, but now that the data is in, it's easy for me, tough for your side. Don't worry, just wait 2 decades, the left will give you plenty to complain about and if they suck enough I will be one of the people complaining, perhaps petitioning against them and for the right. That's why I don't like ideologues; they stay with a dying horse too long, in fact, forever.

Trust me, it's been very entertaining for me to watch you make all kinds of false accusations regarding my true political affiliation.

I don't base my arguments on you, I base them on your extremist ideals. Not to defame you personally, just your tactics.

Once again, you are begging for my time, my intelligence, my wisdom. I thought you didn't care about my response. Can you make up your mind?

I'm not begging for sh!t, I'm just illustrating that every time you respond to this thread that you are chickening out. I don't think a lot of your intelligence, as you don't bring it in, you just avoid. Intelligent discourse includes comprehensive discussion, you lack that.

________________________________________ ________________



1) You asserted that public means government-owned; do you still assert that in light of dictionary/encyclopedic differences? Isn't government-controlled more honest?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public
Public, n, is also defined as the people of a nation not affiliated with the government of that nation.


4) Slacker claims that if he doesn’t pay taxes that, “your property be confiscated (without Constitutional due process, I might add) by the IRS” Do you stand on this, w/o due process in light of contradictory information?
http://taxattorneyarticles.com/irs-tax-lien.php
No properties can't. IRS earning agents are required to attempt every other team process to get payment for your arrears before they can put a levy on your property, bank account, or wages. There are a monkey of ways that you can pay off an IRS tax money owing and also installment agreement, offer in compromise, innocent spouse, and others.
Is there any way too the IRS can't put a levy on my property or wages? There are certain situations at which the IRS can't impose a levy, but a levy can only be held off for a short time. The short list for when the IRS can't levy you is: while you are in an installment agreement; additonally your request for a payment agreement is underway; for 30 days in the wake of a request for an agreement has been rejected or an installment has ended; additonally you are in bankruptcy.

Here’s an appellate case that talks of constant constitutional requirements, so do you still stand that there are no due process requirements for the IRS to seize property for taxes?
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/...h/0250377p.pdf


5) Slacker says the state licenses, taxes, surcharges, and regulates all transportation on land, in the air, and on the waterways, whether it be for private or commercial use. If you do not pay the fees, you will be arrested on the highway, on the landing strip, or on the river. So do you stand by this? The state will cite and release, a form of an arrest, but not as you state it, they will not haul you off in cuffs, it’s a ticket.

Also, should taxes not be assessed so airports can be maintained? Should we be tax abolitionists and avoid taxing airports so the private community can figure it out?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landing_fee


6) Slacker says the Federal Communication Commission that regulates what you can hear over the radio and taxes the radio stations. Slacker, should the FCC allow any and all profanity, nudity, etc? Radio stations get taxed as any business, they may have additional FCC usage fees/taxes, but many businesses do.


7) Slacker claims the control of industry by government has expanded into every factory and instrument of production (essentially that’s a human being, according to Marx). Is this true, even in light of mass deregulation of the airlines, communication, banking and other industries?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deregulation
Deregulation, a term which gained widespread currency in the period 1970-2000, can be seen as a process by which governments remove, reduce, or simplify restrictions on business and individuals, often ostensibly with the intent of encouraging the efficient operation of private markets, but also with the intent of opening up new areas of trade for speculators.


8) Slacker says child labor in factories was really nasty, so we’ll just use NAFTA and GATT to exploit the kids of the Third World. Even though 3rd world labor was around long before NAFTA and GATT, is it the fault of these tax laws that we exploit 3rd world kids? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maquilladora

[slacker00]

That's why I don't like ideologues

We actually agree on this point. But it's probably only because you've rambled so much random gibberish you finally said something that makes sense. I'm sorry about your dying horse.

I browsed through your supposed claims I made. They are complete misrepresentations.

I'm not a libertarian. But you're getting closer, maybe. I do think some libertarian ideals can solve some problems.

[EBSB52]

We actually agree on this point. But it's probably only because you've rambled so much random gibberish you finally said something that makes sense. I'm sorry about your dying horse.

I browsed through your supposed claims I made. They are complete misrepresentations.

I'm not a libertarian. But you're getting closer, maybe. I do think some libertarian ideals can solve some problems.

You breezed thru them but you still don't have the character, ability, etc to answer them. Explain what your original assertions were, reference my counter and then explain where you are with them. You're cornered and what do cornered cowards do? They shim-sham, bs their way out of it. How do you come back from saying that a private business is government property because, A) they are under government regulation and B) because they are required to pay taxes? You can't make logic of that idiocy, so you play a game, hence it is my job to illustrate that every time you do.


As for your whacky political affiliation, couldn't give a sh!t less. Man up for once imn your life and answer my responses to your inanity.


1) You asserted that public means government-owned; do you still assert that in light of dictionary/encyclopedic differences? Isn't government-controlled more honest?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public
Public, n, is also defined as the people of a nation not affiliated with the government of that nation.


4) Slacker claims that if he doesn’t pay taxes that, “your property be confiscated (without Constitutional due process, I might add) by the IRS” Do you stand on this, w/o due process in light of contradictory information?
http://taxattorneyarticles.com/irs-tax-lien.php
No properties can't. IRS earning agents are required to attempt every other team process to get payment for your arrears before they can put a levy on your property, bank account, or wages. There are a monkey of ways that you can pay off an IRS tax money owing and also installment agreement, offer in compromise, innocent spouse, and others.
Is there any way too the IRS can't put a levy on my property or wages? There are certain situations at which the IRS can't impose a levy, but a levy can only be held off for a short time. The short list for when the IRS can't levy you is: while you are in an installment agreement; additonally your request for a payment agreement is underway; for 30 days in the wake of a request for an agreement has been rejected or an installment has ended; additonally you are in bankruptcy.

Here’s an appellate case that talks of constant constitutional requirements, so do you still stand that there are no due process requirements for the IRS to seize property for taxes?
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/...h/0250377p.pdf


5) Slacker says the state licenses, taxes, surcharges, and regulates all transportation on land, in the air, and on the waterways, whether it be for private or commercial use. If you do not pay the fees, you will be arrested on the highway, on the landing strip, or on the river. So do you stand by this? The state will cite and release, a form of an arrest, but not as you state it, they will not haul you off in cuffs, it’s a ticket.

Also, should taxes not be assessed so airports can be maintained? Should we be tax abolitionists and avoid taxing airports so the private community can figure it out?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landing_fee


6) Slacker says the Federal Communication Commission that regulates what you can hear over the radio and taxes the radio stations. Slacker, should the FCC allow any and all profanity, nudity, etc? Radio stations get taxed as any business, they may have additional FCC usage fees/taxes, but many businesses do.


7) Slacker claims the control of industry by government has expanded into every factory and instrument of production (essentially that’s a human being, according to Marx). Is this true, even in light of mass deregulation of the airlines, communication, banking and other industries?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deregulation
Deregulation, a term which gained widespread currency in the period 1970-2000, can be seen as a process by which governments remove, reduce, or simplify restrictions on business and individuals, often ostensibly with the intent of encouraging the efficient operation of private markets, but also with the intent of opening up new areas of trade for speculators.


8) Slacker says child labor in factories was really nasty, so we’ll just use NAFTA and GATT to exploit the kids of the Third World. Even though 3rd world labor was around long before NAFTA and GATT, is it the fault of these tax laws that we exploit 3rd world kids? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maquilladora

[slacker00]

Explain what your original assertions were

Go back and read them. I don't have time to explain every little thing that you don't understand.

[EBSB52]

Go back and read them. I don't have time to explain every little thing that you don't understand.

I fully understand them, I have my opinion and you have briefly stated yours, I retrort and now you're too embarrassed to respond. I'm waiting for you to make a spelling contest out it now, or some other inane misdirection. It's perplexing as to why you either dont' move forward and answer my questions/issues or just go away. But, as I said before, how can defense things like calling a private business government property simply because they follow laws and pay taxes?


1) You asserted that public means government-owned; do you still assert that in light of dictionary/encyclopedic differences? Isn't government-controlled more honest?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public
Public, n, is also defined as the people of a nation not affiliated with the government of that nation.


4) Slacker claims that if he doesn’t pay taxes that, “your property be confiscated (without Constitutional due process, I might add) by the IRS” Do you stand on this, w/o due process in light of contradictory information?
http://taxattorneyarticles.com/irs-tax-lien.php
No properties can't. IRS earning agents are required to attempt every other team process to get payment for your arrears before they can put a levy on your property, bank account, or wages. There are a monkey of ways that you can pay off an IRS tax money owing and also installment agreement, offer in compromise, innocent spouse, and others.
Is there any way too the IRS can't put a levy on my property or wages? There are certain situations at which the IRS can't impose a levy, but a levy can only be held off for a short time. The short list for when the IRS can't levy you is: while you are in an installment agreement; additonally your request for a payment agreement is underway; for 30 days in the wake of a request for an agreement has been rejected or an installment has ended; additonally you are in bankruptcy.

Here’s an appellate case that talks of constant constitutional requirements, so do you still stand that there are no due process requirements for the IRS to seize property for taxes?
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/...h/0250377p.pdf


5) Slacker says the state licenses, taxes, surcharges, and regulates all transportation on land, in the air, and on the waterways, whether it be for private or commercial use. If you do not pay the fees, you will be arrested on the highway, on the landing strip, or on the river. So do you stand by this? The state will cite and release, a form of an arrest, but not as you state it, they will not haul you off in cuffs, it’s a ticket.

Also, should taxes not be assessed so airports can be maintained? Should we be tax abolitionists and avoid taxing airports so the private community can figure it out?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landing_fee


6) Slacker says the Federal Communication Commission that regulates what you can hear over the radio and taxes the radio stations. Slacker, should the FCC allow any and all profanity, nudity, etc? Radio stations get taxed as any business, they may have additional FCC usage fees/taxes, but many businesses do.


7) Slacker claims the control of industry by government has expanded into every factory and instrument of production (essentially that’s a human being, according to Marx). Is this true, even in light of mass deregulation of the airlines, communication, banking and other industries?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deregulation
Deregulation, a term which gained widespread currency in the period 1970-2000, can be seen as a process by which governments remove, reduce, or simplify restrictions on business and individuals, often ostensibly with the intent of encouraging the efficient operation of private markets, but also with the intent of opening up new areas of trade for speculators.


8) Slacker says child labor in factories was really nasty, so we’ll just use NAFTA and GATT to exploit the kids of the Third World. Even though 3rd world labor was around long before NAFTA and GATT, is it the fault of these tax laws that we exploit 3rd world kids? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maquilladora

[slacker00]

you're too embarrassed to respond.

Where do you get this stuff?

What are you doing here on SBR anyway? You don't seem to handicap sports or anything.

[EBSB52]

Where do you get this stuff?

What are you doing here on SBR anyway? You don't seem to handicap sports or anything.

Bahahahah, first it's about how many posts I've made in X amount of time, now it's, "what are you doing here, do u even gamble?" Kid, I've been sports betting long before you. As you can see in the posts I've written, at around week 7 I was looking for a place to lay odds on Miami winning the east, they were in last place at that time. The odds seemed hosed then at 4:1 and my GF's bro didn't wanna get into it, so I let it go. As we know, it came in. Check my SBR, I have 4 picks each week, started out on fire, been sucking since. I'm still above 50%, barely.


Anyway, you don't have the guts to tell us how a private business in government property, so just let the thread go. Drop your ego, or better yet, actually honestly and comprehensively answer my repsonses to your points.



1) You asserted that public means government-owned; do you still assert that in light of dictionary/encyclopedic differences? Isn't government-controlled more honest?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public
Public, n, is also defined as the people of a nation not affiliated with the government of that nation.


4) Slacker claims that if he doesn’t pay taxes that, “your property be confiscated (without Constitutional due process, I might add) by the IRS” Do you stand on this, w/o due process in light of contradictory information?
http://taxattorneyarticles.com/irs-tax-lien.php
No properties can't. IRS earning agents are required to attempt every other team process to get payment for your arrears before they can put a levy on your property, bank account, or wages. There are a monkey of ways that you can pay off an IRS tax money owing and also installment agreement, offer in compromise, innocent spouse, and others.
Is there any way too the IRS can't put a levy on my property or wages? There are certain situations at which the IRS can't impose a levy, but a levy can only be held off for a short time. The short list for when the IRS can't levy you is: while you are in an installment agreement; additonally your request for a payment agreement is underway; for 30 days in the wake of a request for an agreement has been rejected or an installment has ended; additonally you are in bankruptcy.

Here’s an appellate case that talks of constant constitutional requirements, so do you still stand that there are no due process requirements for the IRS to seize property for taxes?
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/...h/0250377p.pdf


5) Slacker says the state licenses, taxes, surcharges, and regulates all transportation on land, in the air, and on the waterways, whether it be for private or commercial use. If you do not pay the fees, you will be arrested on the highway, on the landing strip, or on the river. So do you stand by this? The state will cite and release, a form of an arrest, but not as you state it, they will not haul you off in cuffs, it’s a ticket.

Also, should taxes not be assessed so airports can be maintained? Should we be tax abolitionists and avoid taxing airports so the private community can figure it out?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landing_fee


6) Slacker says the Federal Communication Commission that regulates what you can hear over the radio and taxes the radio stations. Slacker, should the FCC allow any and all profanity, nudity, etc? Radio stations get taxed as any business, they may have additional FCC usage fees/taxes, but many businesses do.


7) Slacker claims the control of industry by government has expanded into every factory and instrument of production (essentially that’s a human being, according to Marx). Is this true, even in light of mass deregulation of the airlines, communication, banking and other industries?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deregulation
Deregulation, a term which gained widespread currency in the period 1970-2000, can be seen as a process by which governments remove, reduce, or simplify restrictions on business and individuals, often ostensibly with the intent of encouraging the efficient operation of private markets, but also with the intent of opening up new areas of trade for speculators.


8) Slacker says child labor in factories was really nasty, so we’ll just use NAFTA and GATT to exploit the kids of the Third World. Even though 3rd world labor was around long before NAFTA and GATT, is it the fault of these tax laws that we exploit 3rd world kids? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maquilladora

[slacker00]

first it's about how many posts I've made in X amount of time

Please find my quote that made this statement. Your lack of comprehension is amazing.

Bahahahah

That's more of what I expect from you.

[EBSB52]

Please find my quote that made this statement. Your lack of comprehension is amazing.



That's more of what I expect from you.

Oh, were the chickem that just asked what I was doing here? OK, they kinda meld together, what are you doing here, you don't bet sports, how long have you been here, how many posts, etc.... It's all the same idiocy from the right oe most commonly the Libertarians. And you guys still sit there and scratch as to why you get no more thna 3% of the populous vote every year. FIGURE IT OUT, YOUR POLITICAL IDEOLOGY IS AS SOUND AS YOUR ARGUMENTATION SKILLS ELSEWHERE. Simply refusing to discuss is fine, then we will fial to vote for your silliness.

[slacker00]

Oh, were the chickem that just asked what I was doing here? OK, they kinda meld together, what are you doing here, you don't bet sports, how long have you been here, how many posts, etc.... It's all the same idiocy from the right oe most commonly the Libertarians. And you guys still sit there and scratch as to why you get no more thna 3% of the populous vote every year. FIGURE IT OUT, YOUR POLITICAL IDEOLOGY IS AS SOUND AS YOUR ARGUMENTATION SKILLS ELSEWHERE. Simply refusing to discuss is fine, then we will fial to vote for your silliness.

You are a chicken.

You are a neocon.

You are a libertarian.

You don't answer my questions.

I guess I'll just play your game from now on.

[EBSB52]

You are a chicken.

You are a neocon.

You are a libertarian.

You don't answer my questions.

I guess I'll just play your game from now on.

No, coward, playing my game entails answering counters to remarks, an exchange, not dropping an idiotic line after the other guy leaves a comprehensive response. So much for you lame excuse of not having time, you spend plenty of time saying nothing and avoiding the issues here, Mr. a private business in government property


1) You asserted that public means government-owned; do you still assert that in light of dictionary/encyclopedic differences? Isn't government-controlled more honest?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public
Public, n, is also defined as the people of a nation not affiliated with the government of that nation.


4) Slacker claims that if he doesn’t pay taxes that, “your property be confiscated (without Constitutional due process, I might add) by the IRS” Do you stand on this, w/o due process in light of contradictory information?
http://taxattorneyarticles.com/irs-tax-lien.php
No properties can't. IRS earning agents are required to attempt every other team process to get payment for your arrears before they can put a levy on your property, bank account, or wages. There are a monkey of ways that you can pay off an IRS tax money owing and also installment agreement, offer in compromise, innocent spouse, and others.
Is there any way too the IRS can't put a levy on my property or wages? There are certain situations at which the IRS can't impose a levy, but a levy can only be held off for a short time. The short list for when the IRS can't levy you is: while you are in an installment agreement; additonally your request for a payment agreement is underway; for 30 days in the wake of a request for an agreement has been rejected or an installment has ended; additonally you are in bankruptcy.

Here’s an appellate case that talks of constant constitutional requirements, so do you still stand that there are no due process requirements for the IRS to seize property for taxes?
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/...h/0250377p.pdf


5) Slacker says the state licenses, taxes, surcharges, and regulates all transportation on land, in the air, and on the waterways, whether it be for private or commercial use. If you do not pay the fees, you will be arrested on the highway, on the landing strip, or on the river. So do you stand by this? The state will cite and release, a form of an arrest, but not as you state it, they will not haul you off in cuffs, it’s a ticket.

Also, should taxes not be assessed so airports can be maintained? Should we be tax abolitionists and avoid taxing airports so the private community can figure it out?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landing_fee


6) Slacker says the Federal Communication Commission that regulates what you can hear over the radio and taxes the radio stations. Slacker, should the FCC allow any and all profanity, nudity, etc? Radio stations get taxed as any business, they may have additional FCC usage fees/taxes, but many businesses do.


7) Slacker claims the control of industry by government has expanded into every factory and instrument of production (essentially that’s a human being, according to Marx). Is this true, even in light of mass deregulation of the airlines, communication, banking and other industries?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deregulation
Deregulation, a term which gained widespread currency in the period 1970-2000, can be seen as a process by which governments remove, reduce, or simplify restrictions on business and individuals, often ostensibly with the intent of encouraging the efficient operation of private markets, but also with the intent of opening up new areas of trade for speculators.


8) Slacker says child labor in factories was really nasty, so we’ll just use NAFTA and GATT to exploit the kids of the Third World. Even though 3rd world labor was around long before NAFTA and GATT, is it the fault of these tax laws that we exploit 3rd world kids? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maquilladora

[slacker00]

You are a coward.

Answer my questions.

[curious]

Where do you get this stuff?

What are you doing here on SBR anyway? You don't seem to handicap sports or anything.

Slacker, just put this crackhead on ignore. I stopped talking to him. All he does is talk nonsense.

I looked back over his last 50 posts. Not ONE of them had anything to do with sports handicapping.

Now, I am not a saint, I have been known to talk trash too from time to time . But, I do make solid picks day in and day out.

[EBSB52]

You are a coward.

Answer my questions.

What questions?

I realize you're patronizing, but as you do, you're breaking your own cardinal rule by casting insults. I have no issue with that, just pointing it out that you whine about it, then do it; hypocrite.

I will glady answer all of your questions, you, OTOH, will contimue to be a coward and avoid.

[EBSB52]

Slacker, just put this crackhead on ignore. I stopped talking to him. All he does is talk nonsense.

I looked back over his last 50 posts. Not ONE of them had anything to do with sports handicapping.

Now, I am not a saint, I have been known to talk trash too from time to time . But, I do make solid picks day in and day out.

Look at my sheet, I pick every week. As well I picked Miami to win their division around week 7ish.

As for not about sports betting, this is the political forum. I know you are reading this, yet you act the coward and avoid as well. Why do you think your party, Republican and / or Libertarian is done? You're part of the 20% of idiots who thinks Bush is a good president, deal with it.