Blogging towards the election
Though not particularly blessed with good looks or athletic ability, God did make sure I had the best family and friends that a person could ever hope for. So why is it so many of them seem to lose all sense of logic and understanding when an election approaches?
24 June 2008 - - - We’re getting closer and closer to the big election this November. Looking at the calendar, we are 19 weeks out today, T-minus 133 days left until Americans go to the polls and elect a new president and a bunch of other people who are bound to screw with my life, my livelihood, my liquor or all of the above.
Even if I didn’t have a calendar handy to count the days and weeks up, I could still tell we’re drawing nearer to November 4 if only because the number of stupid e-mails I’m getting from family and friends letting me know who are the good guys and bad guys are picking up. Stop me if you’ve seen this one already:
Quote:
A little over one year ago:
1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2½ year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) The unemployment rate was 4.5%.
Since voting in a Democratic Congress in 2006 we have seen:
1) Consumer confidence plummet;
2) The cost of regular gasoline soar to over $3.50 a gallon;
3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value evaporate (stock and mutual fund losses);
5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $1.2 trillion dollars;
6) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.
America voted for change in 2006, and we got it!
Remember it's Congress that makes law not the President. He has to work with what's handed to him.
|
Yeah, that poor, misunderstood George W. Bush. The e-mail makes him out to be akin to Kid Gleason, the manager of the 1919 Chicago White Sox who missed out on his shot to be a champion because of a bunch of crooks on his team. The war in Iraq? Congress’ fault. The utter contempt so much of the rest of the world holds for the US? Congress caused that as well. The cost of gas? Yep, you guessed it, Congress is responsible. Never mind that Bush’s own Secretary of Energy Samuel Bodman recently blamed it on the Saudi’s for restricting their spigot. Of course, all Bush did was nominate Bodman. It was obviously Congress' mistake for confirming his appointment.
The past two elections I’ve hated the e-mail crap I’ve received from my family and friends, the biggest abuser being my father who is so far right he makes Ronald Reagan look like a New Dealer. A lot of people will tell you I’m conservative like my father, and for the most part I will agree with that observation. But understand that while I may be conservative like dear ol’ dad, I’m far from being as
Republican as my father.
Back to the e-mails. I delete about 80% of messages that include
FW: in the subject line. There are two reasons I do this starting with the fact I picked up a computer virus about six years ago from a forwarded e-mail. The second reason I have for doing so is two fold: A) Chances are very good I’ve seen whatever joke or photo you’re sending me, or; B) if I haven’t, it can’t be that good if you’re simply forwarding it instead of saving to your hard drive and sending from a fresh e-mail.
Think about it…how many times before e-mail did you receive a letter from your mother that also had a photo of your new little nephew, and your initial thought was you needed to run down and make 20 copies of not only the photo but the letter as well to mail out to your closest friends? Nowadays I hit
Reply All on a lot of the crap I'm sent, much to the chagrin of my father whose distribution list includes a lot of judges and CEO types. Leading up to the '04 election, a few of them ended up asking my dad to not include them on any e-mails that also had me in the distribution. So he masked his addresses, something that just makes it a bit more difficult, but not impossible, to reply to the group.
Whether a friend of mine that sends me political stuff is a hard-donkey or a hard-elephant, one of the first things that I wonder is whether they truly believe all of one party would really be a good thing. Would having all donkeys in power or all elephants in power solve anything? Is the only reason for political graft, corruption and the simple ineptitude of DC because one party or the other doesn’t have complete control?
The e-mail contents above came from an elephant backer, of course. And it starts off on the wrong foot as far as I’m concerned with the note about consumer confidence. To begin with the main reason consumer confidence stood at a recent high was because most of the consumers were finally coming out of post-September 11th fears and had given up on any justice being served to the multitude of offenders in all of the accounting/insider trading scams from shortly after that dreadful day. Not only that, aren’t these the same consumers who voiced their displeasure at the polls and gave a bunch of elephants their walking papers in '06? If we can’t trust them enough to vote GOP, can we really trust their confidence before the 2006 elections when Bill Frist was on duty and the shadow of Tom DeLay was still a haunting figure at the Capitol?
Gas was too cheap at $2.19 a year ago. We’ve probably had it too cheap here for a long time, and the real shock to most Americans is how it’s gone up so sharply, not that it’s nearly $4 a gallon (for me at least). That’s just my opinion.
But what is fact is that 18 months of the donkeys having the majority in Congress has very little, if anything, to do with why you and I are paying more at the pump today. And if it really is the fault of a donkey-controlled Congress, then it was an elephant majority from 1994-2006 that simply didn’t do the right things when they were in charge.
Now a little lesson for the Einstein the elephants hired to do their math. If unemployment was 4.5% in 2006 and is 5.0% now, that is an increase of 11.1%. If it had been the other way, 5.0% to 4.5%, that’s where your 10% cipherin’ would’ve come in as a decrease. Pretty simple math, actually. Sort of makes me wonder if I can really trust any numbers in the report.
But let’s say the rest of the numbers are correct. The $2.3 trillion in stocks and bonds and $1.2 trillion in home equity are drops in the proverbial bucket compared to how much has gone up in smoke since January 2001 when Dubya was sworn in. And if the economy wasn’t in the tank due to the drain this administration has proven to be, or this administration had overseen the recent mortgage crapola that took place with something more than a "how can we line our pockets?" attitude, the foreclosures wouldn’t have happened.
Will it get better under either Obama or McCain? Maybe, but I seriously doubt either will be the reason. After all, like the e-mail said, the president is really only as good as Congress.